In cases of alleged child sexual abuse, information about the timing of events is often needed. However, published developmental laboratory research has demonstrated that children struggle to provide accurate and reliable testimony about time and there is currently a lack of field research examining how attorneys actually question child witnesses about time in court. The current study analyzed 130 trial transcripts from cases of alleged child sexual abuse containing a child witness between the ages of 5–17 years old to determine the frequency, style, and content of attorneys’ questions and child responses about time. We found that attorneys primarily ask closed-ended temporal location questions (i.e., asking when an event took place using a temporal construct such as day, month, and year) to child witnesses. Additionally, children, of all ages, rarely said “I don’t know” or expressed uncertainty in response to temporal questions. These findings are concerning as researchers find that children tend to struggle with temporally locating past events.
CeciS. J.BruckM. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 403–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.403
3.
DenneE.GeorgeS. S.StolzenbergS. N. (2023). Developmental considerations in how defense attorneys employ child sexual abuse and rape myths when questioning alleged victims of child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(23-24), 111914. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231189512
FriedmanW. J. (1991). The development of children's memory for the time of past events. Child Development, 62(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130710
FriedmanW. J. (2008). Developmental perspectives on the psychology of time. In GrondinS. (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 345–366). Emerlad Group Publishing Limited.
8.
FriedmanW. J.GardnerA. G.ZubinN. R. E. (1995). Children's comparisons of the recency of two events from the past year. Child Development, 66(4), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131792
9.
FriedmanW. J.KempS. (1998). The effects of elapsed time and retrieval on young children's judgments of the temporal distances of past events. Cognitive Development, 13(3), 335–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(98)90015-6
FriendO. W.HendersonH. M.LyonT. D. (2022). 4-to 15-year-old children’s misinterpretation of invitations asking “about the time” as requests for temporal information in forensic interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 129, 105675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105675
12.
GoodmanG. S.TaubE. P.JonesD. P. H.EnglandP.PortL. K.RudyL.PradoL.MyersJ. E. B.MeltonG. B. (1992). Testifying in criminal court: Emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(5), 1–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166127
13.
HendersonH.SullivanC. E.WylieB. E.StolzenbergS. N.EvansA. D.LyonT. D. (2023). Child witnesses productively respond to “how” questions about evaluations but struggle with other “how” questions. Child Maltreatment, 28(3), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595231175913
14.
KlemfussJ. Z.ClevelandK. C.QuasJ. A.LyonT. D. (2017). Relations between attorney temporal structure and children's response productivity in cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(2), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12096
15.
KlemfussJ. Z.McWilliamsK.HendersonH. M.OlaguezA. P.LyonT. D. (2020). Order of encoding predicts young children’s responses to sequencing questions. Cognitive Development, 55, 100927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100927
16.
KlemfussJ. Z.QuasJ. A.LyonT. D. (2014). Attorneys' questions and children's productivity in child sexual abuse criminal trials. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 780–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3048
17.
LambM. E.BrownD. A. (2006). Conversational apprentices: Helping children become competent informants about their own experiences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X57657
18.
LambM. E.BrownD. A.HershkowitzI.OrbachY.EsplinP. W. (2018). Tell me what happened: Questioning children about abuse. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118881248
19.
LambM. E.OrbachY.HershkowitzI.EsplinP. W.HorowitzD. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(11-12), 1201–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
LenthR. V.BuerknerP.HerveM.LoveJ.RieblH.SingmannH. (2020). emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means, v1. 5.1. R Core Team.
22.
LyonT. D.McWilliamsK.WilliamsS. (2019). Child witnesses. In BrewerN.DouglassA. B. (Eds.), Psychological science and the law (pp. 157–181). The Guilford Press.
23.
LyonT. D.StolzenbergS. N.McWilliamsK. (2017). Wrongful acquittals of sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(6), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516657355
24.
McWilliamsK.LyonT. D.QuasJ. A. (2019). Maltreated children’s ability to make temporal judgments using a recurring landmark event. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(4), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516645812
25.
McWilliamsK.WilliamsS.StolzenbergS. N.EvansA. D.LyonT. D. (2021). Don’t know responding in young maltreated children: The effects of wh- questions type and enhanced interview instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 45(2), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000404
26.
MyersJ. E. B.RedlichA. D.GoodmanG. S.PrizmichL. P.ImwinkelriedE. (1999). Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(2), 388–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.2.388
27.
OrbachY.LambM. E. (2007). Young children's references to temporal attributes of allegedly experienced events in the course of forensic interviews. Child Development, 78(4), 1100–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01055.x
28.
PathmanT.LarkinaM.BurchM. M.BauerP. J. (2013). Young children's memory for the times of personal past events. Journal of cognition and development: official journal of the Cognitive Development Society, 14(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.641185
29.
PriceH. L.EvansA. D. (2021). With support, children can accurately sequence within‐event components. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(4), 890–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3816
30.
StolzenbergS. N.LyonT. D. (2014). How attorneys question children about the dynamics of sexual abuse and disclosure in criminal trials. Psychology, public policy, and law: an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law, 20(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035000
31.
StolzenbergS. N.LyonT. D. (2017). ‘Where were your clothes?’ Eliciting descriptions of clothing placement from children alleging sexual abuse in criminal trials and forensic interviews. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12094
32.
StolzenbergS. N.McWilliamsK.LyonT. D. (2017a). Spatial language, question type, and young children’s ability to describe clothing: Legal and developmental implications. Law and Human Behavior, 41(4), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000237
33.
StolzenbergS. N.McWilliamsK.LyonT. D. (2017b). The effects of the hypothetical putative confession and negatively valenced yes/no questions on maltreated and nonmaltreated children’s disclosure of a minor transgression. Child Maltreatment, 22(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559516673734
34.
VriezeS. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127
35.
WandreyL.LyonT. D.QuasJ. A.FriedmanW. J. (2012). Maltreated children's ability to estimate temporal location and numerosity of placement changes and court visits. Psychology, public policy, and law: an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law, 18(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024812
36.
WeitzH. (1989) Direct examination of fact witnesses. Trial.
37.
WylieB.StolzenbergS. N.McWilliamsK.EvansA. D.LyonT. D. (2021). Young children’s ability to describe intermediate clothing placement. Child Maltreatment, 26(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559520930825
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
