Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Regardless of compliance to coercion by an alleged perpetrator, child maltreatment is abuse in any form. However, the extent to which coercion is described as an obligation (mandatory compliance) or permission (optional compliance) is legally relevant. The present investigation examined how attorneys question children about coercion and how children describe coercion in courtroom investigations of alleged child sexual abuse, and whether such language influences jurors’ perceptions of children’s testimony. Study 1 assessed 64 transcripts of children’s testimonies and revealed that both attorneys and children use coercive language. Problematically, terms of permission were used when describing sexual abuse, potentially implying compliance was optional. Study 2 presented 160 adults with transcript excerpts, varied by coercive language (obligation or permission) and maltreatment type (sexual abuse or punishment). Coercive language influenced perceptions of coercion and whether the adult was to blame. Maltreatment type influenced perceptions of severity, credibility, and verdict. Overall, coercive language and maltreatment type influence perceptions of how the event unfolded.

Keywords

coercive language child sexual abuse child testimony adult perception obligation permission

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Back

Lips

H. M.

(1998). Child sexual abuse: Victim age, victim gender, and observer gender as factors contributing to attributions of responsibility. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(12), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(98)00098-2

Bliss

L. S.

(1988). Modal usage by preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 9(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(88)90028-7

Bornstein

B. H.

Kaplan

D. L.

Perry

A. R.

(2007). Child abuse in the eyes of the beholder: Lay perceptions of child sexual and physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(4), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.007

Bowerman

(1978). Systematizing semantic knowledge: Changes over time in the child’s organization of word meaning. Child Development, 49(4), 977–987. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128737

Byrnes

J. P.

Duff

M. A.

(1989). Young children’s comprehension of modal expressions. Cognitive Development, 4(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(89)90049-X

California Penal Code . (2017). California v. Ortega, No. PA064937–01 (Cal. Super. Ct. Nov. 16–17, 2010). California Penal Code.

Callaghan

J. E. M.

Alexander

J. H.

Sixsmith

Fellin

L. C.

(2018). Beyond “Witnessing”: Children’s experiences of coercive control in domestic violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(10), 1551–1581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515618946

Davies

Rogers

(2009). Perceptions of blame and credibility toward victims of childhood sexual abuse: Differences across victim age, victim-perpetrator relationship, and respondent gender in a depicted case. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538710802584668

Duggan

L. M.

(1987). Jurors’ perceptions of children in a child sexual abuse trial. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. SUNY Buffalo.

10.

Hirst

Weil

(1982). Acquisition of epistemic and deontic meaning of modals. Journal of Child Language, 9(3), 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004967

11.

Katz

(2016). Beyond the physical incident model: How children living with domestic violence are harmed by and resist regimes of coercive control. Child Abuse Review, 25(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2422

12.

Key

H. G.

Warren

A. R.

Ross

D. F.

(1996). Perceptions of repressed memories: A reappraisal. Law and Human Behavior, 20(5), 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01499041

13.

Kratzer

(1977). What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00353453

14.

Kuczaj

S. A.

Maratsos

M. P.

(1975). What children can say before they will. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behaviour and Development, 21(2), 89–111.

15.

Lamb

M. E.

Brown

D. A.

Hershkowitz

Orbach

Esplin

P. W.

(2018). Tell me what happened: Questioning children about abuse (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

16.

Lev-Wiesel

Massrawa

Binson

(2020). Parents’ and children’s perceptions of child maltreatment. Journal of Social Work, 20(4), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319831364

17.

Perkins

M. R.

(1983). Modal expressions in English. Frances Pinter.

18.

Ross

D. F.

Jurden

F. H.

Lindsay

R. C. L.

Keeney

J. M.

(2003). Replications and limitations of a two-factor model of child witness credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01903.x

19.

Rowsell

Colloff

M. F.

(2022). Are sad children more believable? A systematic review of the relationship between emotional demeanour of child victims and juror credibility judgements. Psychology, Crime and Law, 28(10), 943–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2021.1972109

20.

Saywitz

K. J.

Lyon

T. D.

Goodman

G. S.

(2018). Interviewing children . In Conte

Klika

(Eds.), APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (4th ed., pp. 310–329). Sage.

21.

Sgroi

(1982). Handbook of clinical intervention in child sexual abuse. Simon and Schuster.

22.

Shaver

K. G.

(1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer Science & Business Media.

23.

Shepherd

S. C.

(1982). From deontic to epistemic: An analysis of modals in the history of English, creoles, and language acquisition. In Ahlquist

(Ed.), Papers from the fifth international conference on historical linguistics. Benjamins.

24.

Stark

Hester

(2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218816191

25.

Stephany

(1995). Function and form of modality in first and second language acquisition. In Ramat

A. G.

Galeas

G. C.

(Eds.), From pragmatics to syntax: Modality in second language acquisition (pp. 105–120). Gunter Narr Verlag.

26.

St George

Garcia-Johnson

Denne

Stolzenberg

S. N.

(2020). Jurors’ questions to children testifying in criminal trials about alleged Sexual abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(8), 1032–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820935960

27.

Stolzenberg

S. N.

Lyon

T. D.

(2014). Evidence summarized in attorneys’ closing arguments predicts acquittals in criminal trials of child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 19(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559514539388

28.

Stolzenberg

S. N.

McWilliams

Lyon

T. D.

(2017). Ask versus tell: Potential confusion when child witnesses are questioned about conversations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000136

29.

Sullivan

St George

Stolzenberg

S. N.

Williams

Lyon

T. D.

(2021). Imprecision about body mechanics when child witnesses are questioned about sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP12375–NP12397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521997941

30.

Talmy

(1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2

31.

Waterman

C. K.

Foss‐Goodman

(1984). Child molesting: Variables relating to attribution of fault to victims, offenders, and nonparticipating parents. The Journal of Sex Research, 20(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498409551231

32.

Wellman

H. M.

Miller

J. G.

(2008). Including deontic reasoning as fundamental to Theory of Mind. Human Development, 51(2), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1159/000115958

33.

Wells

C. G.

(1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge University Press.

34.

Wylie

B. E.

Lyon

T. D.

O’Connor

A. M.

Aidy

Evans

A. D.

(2019). Adults’ perceptions of children’s referentially ambiguous responses. Psychology, Crime and Law, 25(7), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1552757

35.

Wylie

B. E.

McWilliams

Stolzenberg

S. N.

Evans

A. D.

Lyon

T. D.

(2022). Young children’s understanding of the epistemic and deontic meanings of ask and tell. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 224, 105516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105516

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB

Describing Coercion in the Courtroom: The Influence of Language and Maltreatment Severity on Jurors’ Perceptions of Child Witnesses

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material