AhernE. C.AndrewsS. J.StolzenbergS. N.LyonT. D. (2018). The productivity of wh-prompts in child forensic interviews. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(13), 2007–2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515621084
2.
AhernE. C.StolzenbergS. N.McWilliamsK.LyonT. D. (2016). The effects of secret instructions and yes/no questions on maltreated and non‐maltreated children's reports of a minor transgression. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 34(6), 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2277
3.
CeciS. J.BruckM. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 403–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.403
4.
Daubertv. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
5.
FritzleyV. H.LeeK. (2003). Do young children always say yes to yes–no questions? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias. Child Development, 74(5), 1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00608
6.
HendersonH. M.LundonG. M.LyonT. D. (2023). Suppositional wh-questions about perceptions, conversations, and actions are more productive than paired yes-no questions when questioning maltreated children. Child Maltreatment, 28(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595211067208
7.
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).
8.
KoehlerJ. J. (2011). Misperceptions about statistics and statistical evidence. In WienerR. L.BornsteinB. H. (Eds.), Handbook of trial consulting (pp. 121–133). Springer.
9.
LambM. E.BrownD. A.HershkowitzI.OrbachY.EsplinP. W. (2018). Tell me what happened (2nd ed.). Wiley.
10.
LyonT. D. (1995). False allegations and false denials in child sexual abuse. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(2), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.1.2.429
11.
LyonT. D.KoehlerJ. J. (1996). The relevance ratio: Evaluating the probative value of expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases. Cornell Law Review, 82(1), 43–78.
12.
LyonT. D.McWilliamsK.WilliamsS. (2019). Child witnesses. In BrewerN.DouglassA. B. (Eds.), Psychological science and the law (pp. 157–181). Guilford.
13.
MalloyL. C.LyonT. D.QuasJ. A. (2007). Filial dependency and recantation of child sexual abuse allegations. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000246067.77953.f7
PearT. H.WyattS. (1914). The testimony of normal and mentally defective children. British Journal of Psychology, 6(3-4), 387–419.
17.
PiersiakH. A.LeviB. H.HumphreysK. L. (2022). Statutory threshold wording is associated with child maltreatment reporting. Child Maltreatment. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595221092961
18.
Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982).
19.
SaywitzK. J.GoodmanG. S.NicholasE.MoanS. F. (1991). Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.59.5.682
20.
SternbergK. J.LambM. E.HershkowitzI.YudilevitchL.OrbachY.EsplinP. W.HovavM. (1997). Effects of introductory style on children’s abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21(11), 1133–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(97)00071-9
21.
WoodJ. M. (1996). Weighing evidence in sexual abuse evaluations: An introduction to Bayes's Theorem. Child Maltreatment, 1(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559596001001004