Research on attitudes toward Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) consistently shows that men are more likely to endorse myths about CSA events, victims and perpetrators, compared to women. Here we present two studies that examine why these gender differences occur. Study one (N = 439) followed a dispositional approach to test the mediating role of empathy, social dominance orientation (SDO) and propensity for moral disengagement in the association between gender and the endorsement of CSA myths. Male participants showed higher levels of SDO and propensity for moral disengagement, and lower empathy, which in turn were associated with greater CSA myths acceptance. Study two (N = 360) followed a situational approach to test these processes using a specific case of CSA. Male participants showed higher levels of SDO and lower empathy, which in turn were associated with lower scores of perceived assault seriousness, victim credibility, perpetrator culpability, and greater victim culpability. Overall, the results suggest that men and women may appraise CSA differently, which can be partly explained by differences in SDO, propensity to morally disengage, and empathy. Furthermore, different cognitive mechanisms may be activated with regard to general appraisals of CSA compared to specific cases of CSA.
AbeidM.MuganyiziP.MassaweS.MpembeniR.DarjE.AxemoP. (2015). Knowledge and attitude towards rape and child sexual abuse—A community-based cross-sectional study in Rural Tanzania. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1757-7
2.
AlaggiaR.Collin-VezinaD.LateefR. (2017). Facilitators and barriers to child sexual abuse (CSA) disclosures: A research update (2000-2016). Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 20(2), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017697312
3.
AlcantaraR.ShortwayK.PrempehB. (2019). The relationship between social dominance orientation and child sexual abuse credibility assessment. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 28(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1592271
4.
AlmeidaA. (2003). Abuso sexual de crianças: Crenças sociais e discursos da Psicologia [Child sexual abuse: Social beliefs and psychology discourses] (Unpublished master dissertation). Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
5.
AntunesC.MagalhãesE. (2019). Uma leitura narrativa do abuso sexual na adolescência: Dos efeitos do problema aos discursos sociais e ao papel do sistema de justiça. [A narrative approach of sexual abuse in adolescence: From the problem effects to social discourses and the role of the justice system]. In CalheirosM. M.MagalhãesE.MonteiroL. (Eds.), Crianças em risco e perigo: Contextos, investigação e intervenção (pp. 67–90). Edições Sílabo.
6.
BäckströmM.BjörklundF. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10
7.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
8.
BanduraA.CapraraG.ZsolnaiL. (2000). Corporate transgressions through moral disengagement. Journal of Human Values, 6(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/097168580000600106
9.
BanwariG. (2013). Adolescent male peer sexual abuse: An issue often neglected. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 35(4), 394. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.122236
10.
BarthJ.BermetzL.HeimE.TrelleS.ToniaT. (2013). The current prevalence of child sexual abuse worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 58(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0426-1
11.
BjärehedM.ThornbergR.WänströmL.GiniG. (2019). Individual moral disengagement and bullying among Swedish fifth graders: The role of collective moral disengagement and pro-bullying behavior within classrooms. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519860889
12.
BroussardS.WagnerW. G.KazelskisR. (1991). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of child sexual abuse: The impact of victim sex, perpetrator sex, respondent sex, and victim response. Journal of Family Violence, 6(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980533
13.
BustamanteA.ChauxE. (2014). Reducing moral disengagement mechanisms: A comparison of two interventions. Journal of Latino/Latin American Studies6(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.18085/llas.6.1.123583644qq115t3
14.
CananS. N.JozkowskiK. N.CrawfordB. L. (2016). Sexual assault supportive attitudes: Rape myth acceptance and token resistance in Greek and Non-Greek college students from two university samples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3502–3530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516636064
15.
ChimI.MagalhãesE.GraçaJ.AntunesC.FerreiraC. (2020). Child Sexual Myth Scale: Validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2020.1801934
16.
Christov-MooreL.SimpsonE. A.CoudéG.GrigaityteK.IacoboniM.FerrariP. F. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 604–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001
17.
ClementeM.EspinosaP.PadillaD. (2019). Moral disengagement and willingness to behave unethically against ex-partner in a child custody dispute. Plos One, 14(3), e0213662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213662
18.
CollingsS. J.PayneM. F. (1991). Attribution of causal and moral responsibility to victims of father-daughter incest: An exploratory examination of five factors. Child Abuse and Neglect, 15, 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2009.10820253
19.
CollingsS. J. (1997). Development, reliability, and validity of the child sexual abuse myth scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(5), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626097012005004
20.
CollingsS. J. (2003). Child sexual abuse myth acceptance among aspirant, trainee, and registered psychologists in Durban, South Africa. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(8), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.8.835
21.
CollingsS. J.LindblomL.MaduS. N.ParkM. S. (2009). The cross-cultural validity of the child sexual abuse myth scale: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 19(1), 9–17.
CromerL. D.FreydJ. J. (2007). What influences believing child sexual abuse disclosures? The roles of depicted memory persistence, participant gender, trauma history, and sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00327.x
24.
CromerL. D.GoldsmithR. E. (2010). Child sexual abuse myths: Attitudes, beliefs and individual differences. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19, 618–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2010.522493
25.
DaviesM.RogersP. (2009). Perceptions of blame and credibility toward victims of childhood sexual abuse: Differences across victim age, victim-perpetrator relationship, and respondent gender in a depicted case. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538710802584668
26.
FromuthM. E.HoltA. R. (2008). Perception of teacher sexual misconduct by age of student. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 17(2), 163–179.
27.
GakhalB.BrownS. (2011). A comparison of the general public’s, forensic professionals’ and students’ attitudes towards female sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.540678
28.
GeerJ. H.EstupinanL. A.Manguno-MireG. M. (2000). Empathy, social skills, and other relevant cognitive processes in rapists and child molesters. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00011-1
29.
GerberG. L.CroninJ. M.SteigmanH. J. (2004). Attributions of blame in sexual assault to perpetrators and victims of both genders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2149–2165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02694.x
30.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
31.
Goodyear-BrownP.FathA.MyersL. (2012). Child sexual abuse: The scope of the problem. In Goodyear-BrownP. (Ed.), Handbook of child sexual abuse: Identification, assessment, and treatment (pp. 3–28). John Wiley & Sons.
32.
GraçaJ.CalheirosM. M.OliveiraA. (2016). Situating moral disengagement: Motivated reasoning in meat consumption and substitution. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.042
33.
GraçaJ.CalheirosM. M.OliveiraA.MilfontT. L., (2018). Why are women less likely to support animal exploitation than men? The mediating roles of social dominance orientation and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.007
34.
GreesonM. R.CampbellR.Fehler-CabralG. (2016). “Nobody deserves this”: Adolescent sexual assault victims’ perceptions of disbelief and victim blame from police. Journal of Community Psychology, 44(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21744
35.
GrubbA.TurnerE. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
36.
HolmesG. R.OffenL.WallerG. (1997). See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Why do relatively few male victims of childhood sexual abuse receive help for abuse-related issues in adulthood?Clinical Psychology Review, 17(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(96)00047-5
37.
KachelS.SteffensM. C.NiedlichC. (2016). Traditional masculinity and femininity: Validation of a new scale assessing gender roles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956
38.
KennedyA. C.ProckK. A. (2016). ‘‘I still feel like I am not normal’’: A review of the role of stigma and stigmatization among female survivors of child sexual abuse, sexual assault, and intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(5), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016673601
39.
LoinazI.BigasN.de SousaA. M. (2019). Comparing intra and extra-familial child sexual abuse in a forensic context. Psicothema, 31(3), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.351
40.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704
41.
MachiaM.LambS. (2009). Sexualized innocence: Effects of magazine ads portraying adult women as sexy little girls. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.1.15
42.
MagalhãesE.SalgueiraA.CostaPCostaM. J. (2011). Empathy in senior year and first year medical students: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 11(52), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-52
43.
MilfontT. L.SibleyC. G. (2016). Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: A one-year Bayesian mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.044
MooreC.DetertJ. R.TrevinoL. K.BakerV. L.MayerD. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x
46.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.HansenJ. J.DevosT.LindnerN. M.RanganathK. A.SmithC. T.OlsonK. R.ChughD.GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053
47.
PalusciV. J.IlardiM. (2020). Risk factors and services to reduce child sexual abuse recurrence. Child Maltreatment, 25(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559519848489
48.
PapaliaN.MannE.OgloffJ. R. (2020). Child sexual abuse and risk of revictimization: Impact of child demographics, sexual abuse characteristics, and psychiatric disorders. Child Maltreatment, 20(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559520932665
49.
PeredaN.GuileraG.SantacanaM. F.Gómez-BenitoJ. (2009). The prevalence of child sexual abuse in community and student samples: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.02.007
50.
PflugradtD. M.AllenB. P.MarshallW. L. (2018). A gendered strength-based treatment model for female sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.012
51.
PrattoF.CidamA.StewartA. L.ZeineddineF. B.ArandaM.AielloA.EicherV. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663
52.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
53.
ReynoldsS. J.DangC. T.YamK. C.LeavittK. (2014). The role of moral knowledge in everyday immorality: What does it matter if I know what is right?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.008
54.
RogersP.DaviesM. (2007). Perceptions of victims and perpetrators in a depicted child sexual abuse case. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 566–584.
55.
RueckertL.NaybarN. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67(2), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.002
56.
RueckertL.BranchB.DoanT. (2011). Are gender differences in empathy due to differences in emotional reactivity?Psychology, 2(6), 574–578. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.26088
57.
RussellK. J.HandC. J. (2017). Rape myth acceptance, victim blame attribution and just world beliefs: A rapid evidence assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.008
ShihM. J.StotzerR.GutiérrezA. S. (2013). Perspective-taking and empathy: Generalizing the reduction of group bias towards Asian Americans to general outgroups. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029790
60.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
61.
SleathE.BullR. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample: Differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(5), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811434696
62.
StoltenborghM.Bakermans- KranenburgM. J.AlinkL. R. A.van IJzendoornM. H. (2015). The prevalence of child maltreatment across the globe: Review of a series of meta-analyses. Child Abuse Review, 24, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2353
63.
StrapkoN.HempelL.MacIlroyK.SmithK. (2016). Gender differences in environmental concern: Reevaluating gender socialization. Society and Natural Resources, 29(9), 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1138563
64.
TabakS. J.KlettkeB. (2014). Mock jury attitudes towards credibility, age, and guilt in a fictional child sexual assault scenario. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 47–55.
65.
TsopelasC.TsetsouS.NtounasP.DouzenisA. (2012). Female perpetrators of sexual abuse of minors: What are the consequences for the victims?International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(4), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.04.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
