This study investigated child protection decision-making practices of healthcare-professionals in community-health-services. We examined the effect of heuristics in professional judgments regarding suspected maltreatment, as affected by the child’s ethnicity, gender, and family socioeconomic-status, as well as the healthcare-worker’s workload-stress, and personal and professional background. Furthermore, we examined how these variables influence judgments regarding suspected maltreatment and intentions to consult and report child-maltreatment. We used an experimental survey design including vignettes manipulating the child’s characteristics. Data was collected from 412 professionals employed at various community-health-service-clinics of the largest health-management organization in northern Israel. Findings show that all subjective factors have a significant effect on suspected child-maltreatment assessment, which appears as a significant predictor of later decisions regarding consultation and reporting. This study lends support to prior research indicating that healthcare-professionals’ decisions may incorporate biases, and suggests how the effects of these biases’ are mediated through a sequence of decisions. Recommendations focus on providing regular consultation opportunities for practitioners.
AlfandariR. (2017). Systemic barriers to effective utilisation of decision-making tools in child protection practice. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 207–215. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.030
2.
AnderstJ.Nielsen-ParkerM.MoffattM.FrazierT.KennedyC. (2016). Using simulation to identify sources of medical diagnostic error in child physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 52, 62–69.
3.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019). Child protection Australia 2017-2018. Child Welfare Series no. 70. Cat. no. CWS 65. Canberra: AIHW.
4.
BartelinkC.van YperenT. A.IngridJ. (2015). Deciding on child maltreatment: A literature review on methods that improve decision-making. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 142–153.
5.
BaumannD.DalgeishL.FlukeJ.KernH. (2011). The decision-making ecology. American Humane Association.
6.
Ben-AriehA. (2010). Localities, social services and child abuse: The role of community characteristics in social services allocation and child abuse reporting. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 536–543.
7.
BenbenishtyR.Davidson-AradB.ChenW.GlasserS.TzurS.Lerner-GevaL. (2011). The decision of hospital-based child protection teams to report to community child protective services. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1232–1250.
8.
BroadhurstK.HallC.WastellD.WhiteS.PithouseA. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1046–1064.
9.
BywatersP.BradyG.SparksT.BosE.BuntingL.DanielB.FeatherstoneB.MorriseK.ScourfieldJ. (2015). Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: Explaining the ‘inverse intervention law. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 98–105.
10.
ChenW.BalabanR.StangerV.HaruviR.ZurS.AugartenA. (2002). Suspected child abuse and neglect: Assessment in a hospital setting. Israel Medical Association Journal, 4, 617–623.
11.
Cukovic-BagicI.WelburyR. R.FlanderG. B.Hatibovic-KofmanS.NuzzoleseE. (2013). Child protection: Legal and ethical obligation regarding the report of child abuse in four different countries. The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 31, 15–21.
12.
D’cruzH.GillinghamP.MelendezS. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. The British Journal of Social Work, 37, 73–90.
13.
DettlaffA. J.RivauxS. L.BaumannD. J.FlukeJ. D.RycraftJ. R.JamesJ. (2011). Disentangling substantiation: The influence of race, income, and risk on the substantiation decision in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1630–1637.
14.
EbelR. L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika, 16, 407–424.
15.
EnoshG.Bayer-TopilskyT. (2014). Reasoning and bias: Heuristics in safety assessment and placement decisions for children at risk. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 1771–1787.
16.
EnoshG.NoumanH.SchneckC. (2019). Child’s religiosity, ethnic origin and gender: Risk assessment and placement decisions in cases of ambiguous risk to children from low-SES families. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(7) 766–774.
17.
EnoshG.NoumanH.SharonO. (2017). Between professionalism and traditional social norms: Social workers’ parental custody recommendations. British Journal of Social Work, 47(7), 2032–2048. http://doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw062
18.
EnoshG.TzafrirS. S. (2015). The scope of client aggression toward social workers in Israel. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(9), 971–985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1070233
19.
FeatherstoneB.MorrisK.DanielB.BywatersP.BradyG.BuntingL.MasonW.MirzaN. (2017). Poverty, inequality, child abuse and neglect: Changing the conversation across the UK in child protection?Children and Youth Services Review, 97, 127–133.
20.
FengJ.LevineM. (2005). Factors associated with nurses’ intention to report child abuse: A national survey of Taiwanese nurses. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 783–795.
21.
FlahertyE. G.JonesR.SegeR., & Child Abuse Recognition Experience Study Research Group. (2004). Telling their stories: Primary care practitioners’ experience evaluating and reporting injuries caused by child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 939–945.
22.
FlahertyE. G.SegeR. D.GriffithJ.PriceL. L.WassermanR.SloraE.DhepyasuwanN.HarrisD.NortonD.AngelilliM. L.AbneyD.BinnsH. J. (2008). From suspicion of physical child abuse to reporting: Primary care clinician decision-making. Pediatrics, 122, 611–619.
23.
FlukeJ. D.ChabotM.FallonB.MacLaurinB.BlackstockC. (2010). Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups: An application of the decision-making ecology through multi-level analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 57–69.
24.
FosterR. H.Olson-DorffD.ReilandH. M.Budzak-GarzaA. (2017). Commitment, confidence, and concerns: Assessing health care professionals’ child maltreatment reporting attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 54–63.
25.
GambrillE. (2008). Decision making in child welfare: Constraints and potentials. In LindseyD.ShlonskyA. (Eds.), Child welfare research: Advances for practice and policy (pp-175–193). Oxford University Press.
26.
GambrillE.ShlonskyA. (2000). Risk assessment in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 813–837.
27.
GilbertR.KempA.ThoburnJ.SidebothamP.RadfordL.GlaserD.MacMillanH. L. (2009). Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. The Lancet, 373, 167–180.
28.
GillinghamP. (2016). Predictive risk modelling to prevent child maltreatment and other adverse outcomes for service users: Inside the ‘black box’ of machine learning. The British Journal of Social Work, 46, 1044–1058.
29.
GillinghamP.HumphreysC. (2010). Child protection practitioners and decision-making tools: Observations and reflections from the front line. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2598–2616.
30.
HarrisM. S.HackettW. (2008). Decision pointsin child welfare: An action research model to address disproportionality. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 199–215.
31.
HorwathJ. (2007). The missing assessment domain: Personal, professional and organizational factors influencing professional judgements when identifying and referring child neglect. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 1285–1303.
32.
Høybye-MortensenM. (2015). Decision-making tools and their influence on caseworkers’ room for discretion. The British Journal of Social Work, 45, 600–615.
33.
HughesR. C.RycusaJ. S. (2006). Issues in risk assessment in child protective services. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1, 85–116.
34.
HymelK. P.LaskeyA. L.CrowellK. R.WangM.Armijo-GarciaV.FrazierT. N.TievesK. S.FosterR.WeeksK., & Pediatric Brain Injury Research Network (PediBIRN) Investigators. (2018). Racial and ethnic disparities and bias in the evaluation and reporting of abusive head trauma. The Journal of Pediatrics, 198, 137–143.
35.
Israel National Council for the Child (2018). The state of the child in Israel: 2018 statistical yearbook. Israel National Council for the Child (Hebrew).
36.
JonesR.FlahertyE. G.BinnsH. J.PriceL. L.SloraE.AbneyD.HarrisD. L.ChristoffeK. K.SegeR. D., &Child Abuse Reporting Experience Study Research Group. (2008). Clinicians’ description of factors influencing their reporting of suspected child abuse: Report of the child abuse reporting experience study research group. Pediatrics, 122, 259–266.
37.
KingA. J.FarstK. J.JaegerM. W.OnukwubeJ. I.RobbinsJ. M. (2015). Maltreatment-related emergency department visits among children 0 to 3 years old in the United States. Child Maltreatment, 20, 151–161.
38.
LaneW. G.RubinD. M.MonteithR.ChristianC. W. (2002). Racial differences in the evaluation of pediatric fractures for physical abuse. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 1603–1609.
39.
MathewsB.KennyM. C. (2008). Mandatory reporting legislation in the United States, Canada, and Australia: A cross-jurisdictional review of key features, differences, and issues. Child Maltreatment, 13, 50–63.
40.
MathewsB.LeeX. J.NormanR. E. (2016). Impact of a new mandatory reporting law on reporting and identification of child sexual abuse: A seven year time trend analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 56, 62–79.
41.
McLennanR. N. (1993). Interrater reliability with SPSS for Windows 5.0. The American Statistician, 47, 292–297.
42.
McTavishJ. R.KimberM.DevriesK.ColombiniM.MacGregorJ. C. D.WathenC. N.AgarwalA.MacMillanH. L. (2017). Mandated reporters’ experiences with reporting child maltreatment: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open, 7, e013942.
43.
MorrisonT. (2007). Emotional intelligence, emotion and social work: Context, characteristics, complications and contribution. The British Journal of Social Work, 37, 245–263.
44.
MunroE. (1999). Common errors of reasoning in child protection work. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 745–758.
45.
MunroE. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report, a child-centred system. The Stationery Office.
46.
MunroE. (2019a). Decision-making under uncertainty in child protection: Creating a just and learning culture. Child & Family Social Work, 24, 123–130.
47.
MunroE. (2019b). Predictive analytics in child protection (CHESS working paper No. 2019-03). Durham: Durham University.
48.
NajdowskiC. J.BernsteinK. M. (2018). Race, social class, and child abuse: Content and strength of medical professionals’ stereotypes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 86, 217–222.
49.
NoumanH.AlfandariR.EnoshG.DolevL.Daskal-WeichhendlerH. (2020). Mandatory reporting between legal requirements and personal interpretations: Community healthcare professionals’ reporting of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 101, 104–261.
50.
NoumanH.EnoshG.JarjouraA. (2019). Between professional norms and professionalism: Risk assessment and decision-making of Arab social workers regarding children at risk. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(5), 572–583.
51.
O’ConnorL.LeonardK. (2014). Decision making in children and families social work: The practitioner’s voice. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1805–1822.
52.
O’NeillC. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
53.
PawlikM.KempA.MaguireS.NuttallD.FeldmanK. W.LindbergD. M. (2016). Children with burns referred for child abuse evaluation: Burn characteristics and co-existent injuries. Child Abuse & Neglect, 55, 52–61.
54.
PietrantonioA. M.WrightE.GibsonK. N.AlldredT.JacobsonD.NiecA. (2013). Mandatory reporting of child abuse and neglect: Crafting a positive process for health professionals and caregivers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 102–109.
55.
RogersW. H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. STATA Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23.
56.
RossiP. H. (1979). Vignettes analysis: Uncovering the narrative structure of complex judgments. In MertonR. K.ColmanJ. C.RossiP. H. (Eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld (pp. 176–186). Free Press.
57.
RossiP. H.AndersonA. B. (1982). The factorial survey approach: Introduction. In RossiP. H.NockS. L. (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (pp. 15–67). Sage.
58.
SaltielD. (2015). Observing front line decision making in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 2104–2119.
59.
SegeR. D.FlahertyE. G. (2008). Forty years later: Inconsistencies in reporting of child abuse. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 93, 822–824.
60.
SegeR.FlahertyE.JonesR.PriceL. L.HarrisD.SloraE.WassermanR. (2011). To report or not to report: Examination of the initial primary care management of suspicious childhood injuries. Academic Pediatrics, 11, 460–466.
61.
ShimoniE.BenbenishtyR. (2011). Maltreated and neglected children who live in residential care facilities and in the community: Background and results. Central Bureau of Statistics.
62.
ShlonskyA.WagnerD. (2005). The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 409–427.
63.
SpectorP. E.JexS. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367.
64.
StataCorp. (2015). Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. StataCorp LP.
65.
WilkinsD. (2013). Balancing risk and protective factors: How do social workers and social work managers analyse referrals that may indicate children are at risk of significant harm. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 395–411.
66.
WilliamsR. L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645–646.
67.
WoodJ. N.HallM.SchillingS.KerenR.MitraN.RubinD. M. (2010). Disparities in the evaluation and diagnosis of abuse among infants with traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics, 126, 408–414.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
