This study of attrition compares the prosecution of child sexual offenses reported while the complainant was still a child with those in which the report was delayed into adulthood; it also compares matters involving adult and young (under 18 years) suspects/defendants. It is based on an analysis of police and court administrative data in New South Wales, Australia over a 14-year period (2003–2016). Only one in five (21.6%) proceeded beyond the investigation stage. Criminal proceedings were more likely to commence when the alleged victim was 7–12 years old at the time of the incident, when the suspect was an adult and at least 10 years older than the victim, and also when the report to police was made when the victim was an adult. Just over half (55.5%) of the matters finalized in court resulted in a conviction. Cases in the higher courts were less likely to be dismissed and more likely to feature guilty pleas and convictions at trial than cases in the lower courts. The overall estimate is that only 12% of offenses reported to police resulted in a conviction, at a relatively stable rate over 14 years. These findings are consistent with those of comparable studies.
BaileyC.PowellM.BrubacherS. J. (2017). The attrition of indigenous and non-indigenous child sexual abuse cases in two Australian jurisdictions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23, 178–190.
3.
BrewerK.RoweD.BrewerD. (1997). Factors related to prosecution of child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 91–111.
4.
BuntingL. (2008). Sexual offences against children: An exploration of attrition in the Northern Ireland criminal justice system. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1109–1118.
5.
BuntingL. (2014). Exploring the influence of reporting delay on criminal justice outcomes: Comparing child and adult reporters of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23, 577–594.
6.
BurrowsK. S.PowellM. (2014). Prosecutors’ recommendations for improving child witness statements about sexual abuse. Policing and Society, 24, 189–207.
7.
CashmoreJ. (1995). The prosecution of child sexual assault: A survey of NSW DPP solicitors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 28, 32–54.
8.
CashmoreJ. (2017). Child witnesses. In YoungL.KennyM. A.MonahanG. (Eds.), Children and the law in Australia (2nd ed., pp. 563–586). Sydney, Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths.
9.
ChristensenL.SharmanS.PowellM. (2016). Identifying the characteristics of child sexual abuse cases associated with the child or child’s parent withdrawing the complaint. Child Abuse & Neglect, 57, 53–60.
10.
ConnollyD. A.CoburnP. I.ChongK. (2017). Twenty-six years prosecuting historic child sexual abuse cases: Has anything changed?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23, 166–177.
11.
CrossT. P.DeVosE.WhitcombD. (1994). Prosecution of child sexual abuse: Which cases are accepted?Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 663–677.
12.
CrossT. P.WalshW. A.SimonM.JonesL. M. (2003). Prosecution of child abuse: A meta-analysis of rates of criminal justice decisions. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 323–340.
13.
DalyK.BouhoursB. (2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice, 39, 565–650.
14.
DuronJ. F. (2018). Legal decision-making in child sexual abuse investigations: A mixed-methods study of factors that influence prosecution. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 302–314.
15.
EastwoodC.KiftS.GraceR. (2006). Attrition in child sexual assault cases: Why Lord Chief Justice Hale got it wrong. Journal of Judicial Administration, 16, 81–91.
16.
EdelsonM. G.JoaD. (2010). Differences in legal outcomes for male and female children who have been sexually abused. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 427–442.
17.
ErnbergE.TideforsI.LandströmS. (2016). Prosecutors’ reflections on sexually abused preschoolers and their ability to stand trial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 57, 21–29.
FitzgeraldJ. (2006). The attrition of sexual offences from the New South Wales criminal justice system. Crime and Justice Bulletin(No. 92, 1). Sydney, Australia: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
20.
FlynnA.FreibergA. (2018April). Plea negotiations: An empirical analysis. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No. 544. Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved fromhttps://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi544
21.
GoldingJ. M.LynchK. R.MalikS. E.Foster-GimbelO. (2018). Justice served? Perceptions of plea bargaining involving a sexual assault in child and adult females. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 503–518.
22.
HamerD. (2010). Trying delays: Forensic disadvantage in child sexual assault trials. Criminal Law Review, 9, 671–693.
23.
HershkowitzI.LambM. E.KatzC. (2014). Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 336–344.
KellyL.LovettJ.ReganL. (2005). A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. London, England: Home Office Research Study.
26.
KlemfussJ. Z.QuasJ. A.LyonT. D. (2014). Attorneys’ questions and children’s productivity in child sexual abuse criminal trials. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 780–788.
27.
LeachC. L.PowellM. B.SharmanS. J.AnglimJ. (2017). The relationship between children’s age and disclosures of sexual abuse during forensic interviews. Child Maltreatment, 22, 79–88.
28.
LippertT.CrossT.JonesL.WalshW. (2009). Telling interviewers about sexual abuse: Predictors of child disclosure at forensic interview. Child Maltreatment, 14, 100–113.
29.
LondonK.BruckM.CeciS.ShumanD. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell?Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11, 194–226.
30.
ParkinsonP.OatesK.JayakodyA. (2010). Breaking the long silence: Reports of child sexual abuse in the Anglican Church of Australia. Ecclesiology, 6, 183–200.
31.
ParkinsonP.ShrimptonS.SwanstonH.O’TooleB.OatesK. (2002). The process of attrition in child sexual assault cases: A case flow analysis of criminal investigations and prosecution. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 35, 347–362.
32.
PipeM. E.LambM. E.OrbachY.CederborgA. C. (Eds.). (2007). Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
PriebeG.SvedinC. G. (2008). Child sexual abuse is largely hidden from the adult society: An epidemiological study of adolescents’ disclosures. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1095–1098.
34.
RinglandC.SnowL. (2014). Predictors of guilty pleas in the NSW District Court. Crime and Justice Statistics Bureau Brief (Issue paper No. 96). Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
35.
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2017). Final Report vol. 10: Children with harmful sexual behaviours. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.
36.
SheadK. (2014). Responding to historic child sexual abuse: A prosecution perspective on current challenges and future directions. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 26, 55–73.
StroudD. D.MartensS. L.BarkerJ. (2000). Criminal investigation of child sexual abuse: A comparison of cases referred to the prosecutor to those not referred. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 689–700.
39.
WalshW.JonesL.CrossT.LippertT. (2010). Prosecuting child sexual abuse: The importance of evidence type. Crime and Delinquency, 56, 436–454.
40.
WilliamsR. L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645–646.
41.
WundersitzJ. (2003). Child victimisations: Tracking from incident report to finalization in court. Adelaide, Australia: Office of Crime Statistics.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
