Although parental substance abuse has been identified as a risk factor for poor foster care outcomes, current research on effective interventions is limited. A few studies have shown that parenting interventions improved parenting skills and family functioning and decreased time to reunification among children in foster care due to parental substance abuse. However, more research is needed to evaluate whether these interventions positively impact reentry rates. Using propensity score analyses to establish a matched comparison group, survival analyses evaluated the relationship between participation in a parenting intervention, the Strengthening Families Program (SFP), and reentry among a sample of 493 children previously reunified with their parents. The overall reentry rate was 20.9%. Analyses indicated that there was no difference in reentry rates between the SFP (23.7%) and comparison groups (18.6%). Significant predictors of reentry were child behavior problems, family poverty, and reunification between 15 and 18 months from removal.
Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, 105th Congress, Pub. L. No. 105–89.
2.
AkinB. A.BrookJ.LloydM. H. (2015). Examining the role of methamphetamine in permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85(2), 119.
3.
AllisonP. D. (2004). Event history analysis. In HardyM. B. (Ed.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 369–386). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BarthR. P.GibbonsC.GuoS. (2006). Substance abuse treatment and the recurrence of maltreatment among caregivers with children living at home: A propensity score analysis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 93–104.
5.
BarthR. P.GuoS.McCraeJ. S. (2008). Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating the success of child and family service programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 212–222. doi:10.1177/1049731507307791
6.
BarthR. P.WeigensbergE. C.FisherP. A.FetrowB.GreenR. L. (2008). Reentry of elementary aged children following reunification from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 353–364. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.002
7.
BaumannD.DalgleishL.FlukeJ. D.KernH. (2014). The decision-making ecology. Washington, DC: American Humane Association.
8.
BerrickJ. D. (1998). When children cannot remain home: Foster family care and kinship care. Future of Children, 8, 72–87.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.JonesB. S. (2007). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BrookJ.AkinB. A.LloydM.BhattaraiJ.McDonaldT. P. (2016). The use of prospective versus retrospective pretests with child-welfare involved families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(9), 2740–2752.
12.
BrookJ.AkinB. A.LloydM. H.Johnson-MotoyamaM.YanY. (2016). Family drug treatment courts as comprehensive service models: Cost considerations. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 67(3), 23–43.
13.
BrookJ.AkinB. A.LloydM. H.YanY. (2015). Family drug court, targeted parent training and family reunification: Did this enhanced service strategy make a difference?Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 66(2), 35–52.
14.
BrookJ.McDonaldT. P. (2007). Evaluating the effects of comprehensive substance abuse intervention on successful reunification. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(6), 664–673.
15.
BrookJ.McDonaldT. (2009). The impact of parental substance abuse on the stability of family reunifications from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(2), 193–198.
16.
BrookJ.McDonaldT.GregoireT.PressA.HindmanB. (2010). Parental substance abuse and family reunification. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 10(4), 393–412.
17.
BrookJ.McDonaldT. P.YanY. (2012). An analysis of the impact of the Strengthening Families Program on family reunification in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 691–695.
18.
ChoiS.HuangH.RyanJ. P. (2012). Substance abuse treatment completion in child welfare: Does substance abuse treatment completion matter in the decision to reunify families?Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1639–1645.
19.
ChoiS.RyanJ. P. (2006). Completing substance abuse treatment in child welfare: The role of co-occurring problems and primary drug of choice. Child Maltreatment, 11, 313–325.
20.
ChuangE.MooreK.BarrettB.YoungM. S. (2012). Effect of an integrated family dependency treatment court on child welfare reunification, time to permanency and re-entry rates. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1896–1902.
21.
CourtneyM. E. (1995). Reentry to foster care of children returned to their families. The Social Service Review, 69, 226–241.
22.
CourtneyM. E.PiliavinI.WrightB. R. E. (1997). Transitions from and returns to out of home care. Social Service Review, 71, 652–667.
23.
DeGarmoD. S.ReidJ. B.FetrowB. A.FisherP. A.AntoineK. D. (2013). Preventing child behavior problems and substance use: The pathways home foster care reunification intervention. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 22, 388–406.
24.
DeMarshJ.KumpferK. L. (1986). Family-oriented interventions for the prevention of chemical dependency in children and adolescents. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 18, 117–151.
25.
FestingerT. (1996). Going home and returning to foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, 383–402. doi:10.1016/0190-7409(96)00011-4
26.
FisherP. A.BurrastonB.PearsK. (2005). The early intervention foster care program: Permanent placement outcomes from a randomized trial. Child Maltreatment, 10, 61–71. doi:10.1177/1077559504271561
27.
ForehandR.McMahonR. J. (1981). Helping the noncompliant child: A clinician’s guide to effective parent training. New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
FrameL.BerrickJ. D.BrodowskiM. L. (2000). Understanding reentry to out-of-home care for reunified infants. Child Welfare, 79, 339–369.
29.
FullerT.NietoM. (2014). Child welfare services and risk of child maltreatment rereports: Do services ameliorate initial risk?Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 46–54. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.015
30.
GreenB. L.RockhillA.BurrusS. W. (2008). The role of interagency collaboration for substance-abusing families involved with child welfare. Child Welfare, 87, 29.
31.
GuoS.FraserM. W. (2014). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: Sage Publications.
32.
JonesL. (1998). The social and family correlates of successful reunification of children in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 20, 305–323. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(98)00009-7
33.
Jonson-ReidM. (2003). Foster care and future risk of maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 25, 271–294. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(03)00012-4
34.
KumpferK. L.DeMarshJ. (1986). Family environmental and genetic influences on children’s future chemical dependency. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 18, 49–91.
35.
KumpferK. L.WhitesideH.GreeneJ. A.AllenK. C. (2010). Effectiveness outcomes of four age versions of the strengthening families program in statewide field sites. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 211.
36.
LeeS.Jonson-ReidM.DrakeB. (2012). Foster care re-entry: Exploring the role of foster care characteristics, in-home child welfare services and cross-sector services. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1825–1833. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.007
37.
Lenz-RashidS. (2013). Supportive housing for homeless families: Foster care outcomes and best practices. Sacramento, CA: Sierra Health Foundation.
38.
LloydM. (2015). Family drug courts: Conceptual frameworks, empirical evidence, and implications for social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 96(1), 49–57.
39.
LloydM. H.AkinB. A. (2014). The disparate impact of alcohol, methamphetamine, and other drugs on family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 72–81.
40.
Lutra Group. (2012). Strengthening families program year 5 final evaluation report. Unpublished program report. Salt Lake City, UT: Lutra Group.
41.
MariscalE. S.LimingK. W.McDonaldT. P. (2016). Ready, set, go! Planning strategies to adopt and install a parenting program for substance-affected families. Workshop at the Child Welfare League of American 2016 National Conference, Anaheim, CA.
42.
McDonaldT.BrysonS.PoertnerJ. (2006). Balancing reunification and reentry goals. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.02.007
43.
O’FlynnM. (1999). Adoption and safe families Act of 1997: Changing child welfare policy without addressing parental substance abuse. The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 16, 243.
44.
PattersonG. R. (1976). Living with children: New methods for parents and teachers. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
45.
PriceA.WichtermanL. (2003). Shared family care: Fostering the whole family to promote safety and stability. Journal of Family Social Work, 7, 35–54. doi:10.1300/J039v07n02_04
46.
RiveraM.SullivanR. (2015). Rethinking child welfare to keep families safe and together: Effective housing-based supports to reduce child trauma, maltreatment recidivism, and re-entry to foster care. Child Welfare, 94, 185–204.
47.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
48.
RyanJ. P.ChoiS.HongJ. S.HernandezP.LarrisonC. R. (2008). Recovery coaches and substance exposed births: An experiment in child welfare. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1072–1079. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.12.011
49.
ShawT. V. (2006). Reentry into the foster care system after reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 1375–1390. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.02.006
50.
ShureM. B.SpivackG. (1982). Interpersonal problem-solving in young children: A cognitive approach to prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 341–356. doi:10.1007/BF00896500
51.
SloanF. A.GiffordE. J.EldredL. M.AcquahK. F.BlevinsC. E. (2013). Do specialty courts achieve better outcomes for children in foster care than general courts?Evaluation Review, 37, 3–34. doi:10.1177/0193841X13487536
52.
SmithD. K.JohnsonA. B.PearsK. C.FisherP. A.DeGarmoD. S. (2007). Child maltreatment and foster care: Unpacking the effects of prenatal and postnatal parental substance use. Child Maltreatment, 12, 150–160. doi:10.1177/1077559507300129
53.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13. College Station, TX: Author.
54.
TestaM. F.SmithB. (2009). Prevention and drug treatment. Future of Children, 19, 147–168.
55.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children Youth and Families, & Children’s Bureau. (n.d.). Child welfare outcomes 2010–2013: Report to congress. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/cwo-10-13
56.
VanderploegJ. J.ConnellC. M.CaronC.SaundersL.KatzK. H.TebesJ. K. (2007). The impact of parental alcohol or drug removals on foster care placement experiences: A matched comparison group study. Child Maltreatment, 12, 125–136.
57.
VesneskiW. (2011). State law and the termination of parental rights. Family Court Review, 49, 364–378. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01377.x
58.
Westat & Chapin Hall Center for Children. (2001). Permanency: A balancing act. In Westat & Chapin Hall Center for Children (Eds.), Assessing the context of permanency and reunification in the foster care system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Retrieved from: https://aspe.hhs.gov/report/assessing-context-permanency-and-reunification-foster-care-system
59.
WhitakerD. J.Rogers-BrownJ. S.Cowart-OsborneM.Self-BrownS.LutzkerJ. R. (2015). Public child welfare staff knowledge, attitudes, and referral behaviors for an evidence based parenting program. Psychosocial Intervention, 24, 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.psi.2015.06.001
60.
WulczynF. (2004). Family reunification. The Future of Children, 14, 95–113.
61.
ZuravinS. J.DePanfilisD. (1997). Factors affecting foster care placement of children receiving child protective services. Social Work Research, 21, 34–42. doi:10.1093/swr/21.1.34
