This study analyzed the frequency and correlates of criminal investigation of child maltreatment in cases investigated by child protective service (CPS), using national probability data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being. Criminal investigations were conducted in slightly more than 25% of cases. Communities varied substantially in percentage criminally investigated. Sexual abuse was the most frequent type of maltreatment criminally investigated followed by physical abuse. Logistic regression results indicated that criminal investigations were more likely when caseworkers perceived greater harm and more evidence; when CPS conducted an investigation rather than an assessment; when a parent or a legal guardian reported the maltreatment; and when cases were located in communities in which CPS and police had a memorandum of understanding (MOU) governing coordination. Most variation between communities in criminal investigation remained unexplained. The findings suggest the potential of MOUs for communities wanting to increase criminal investigation.
American Prosecutors Research Institute. (2004). Investigation and prosecution of child abuse (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BaumC. (2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
3.
BollenbacherV.SakagawaT. (2006). Justice, therapeutic and hybrids and implications for children’s rights: A review of state policy. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 682–703. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.06.011
4.
BrewerK. D.RoweD. M.BrewerD. D. (1997). Factors related to prosecution of child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 91–111. doi:10.1300/J070v06n01_07
5.
BrownM. K. (1981). Working the street: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
CageR. L.PenceD. M. (2006). Criminal investigation of child sexual abuse. Portable Guides to Investigating Child Abuse Series. Washington, DC; U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
CameronA.TrivediP. (2010). Microeconometrics using Stata. Revised edition. College Station, TX, Stata Press.
ChuangE.WellsR.AaronsG. (2014). Identifying depression in a national sample of caregivers investigated in regard to their child’s welfare. Psychiatric Services, 65, 911–917. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201300010
10.
ChuangE.WellsR.BellettiereJ.CrossT. P. (2013). Identifying the substance abuse treatment needs of caregivers involved in child welfare. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 45, 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.01.007
CrossT. P.DeVosE.WhitcombD. (1994). Prosecution of child sexual abuse: Which cases are accepted?Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 661–677. doi:01452134(94)E0029-S9-S
CrossT. P.GouletB.HeltonJ. J.LuxE.FullerT. (2015). What will happen to this child if I report? Outcomes of reporting child maltreatment. In BrossD.MathewsB. (Eds.), Mandatory reporting laws and the identification of severe child abuse and neglect. New York, NY: Springer.
15.
CrossT. P.JonesL.WalshW.SimoneM.KolkoD. (2007). Child forensic interviewing in children’s advocacy centers: Empirical data on a practice model. Child Abuse & Neglect, 311031–1052. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.007
16.
CrossT. P.JonesL. J.WalshW.SimoneM.KolkoD. J.SzczepanskiJ.…ShadoinA. (2008). The multi-site evaluation of children’s advocacy centers: Overview of the results and implications for practice. OJJDP Crimes Against Children Series Bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
17.
DavisK. C. (1975). Police discretion. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
18.
DeLeeuwJ.MeijerE. (2008). Handbook of multilevel analysis. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
DolanM.SmithK.CasanuevaC.RingeisenH. (2011). NSCAW II baseline report: Introduction to NSCAW II. OPRE Report #2011-27a, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/abuse_neglect/nscaw/reports/nscaw2_intro/nscaw2_intro.pdf
21.
DowdK.DolanM.WallinJ.MillerK. A.BiemerP.Aragon-LoganE.SmithK. (2010). National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being II: Data File User's Manual Restricted Release Version. Ithaca, New York: National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect.
22.
EnglishD. J.MarshallD. B.CoghlanL.BrummelS.OrmeM. (2002). Causes and consequences of the substantiation decision in Washington State Child Protective Services. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 817–851. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(02)00241-4
FullerT. (2014). Beyond investigations: Differential response in child protective services. In KorbinJ. E.KrugmanR. D. (Eds.), Handbook of child maltreatment (pp. 443–462). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media.
25.
GarlandA.LandsverkJ.HoughR.Ellis-MacLeodE. (1996). Type of maltreatment as a predictor of mental health service use for children in foster care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20, 675–688. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(96)00056-7
26.
GroenevaldR. F. (2005). Arrest discretion of police officers: The impact of varying organizational structures. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly.
27.
HarrisM.HackettW. (2008). Decision points in child welfare: An action research model to address disproportionality. Children & Youth Services Review, 30, 199–215. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.09.006
28.
HarshbargerS. (1987). Prosecution is an appropriate response in child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 108–112. doi:10.1177/088626087002001008
29.
HawkinsK. (Ed). (1992). The uses of discretion. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
30.
HillR. B. (2006). Synthesis of research on disproportionality in child welfare: An update. Casey-CSSP Alliance for Racial Equity in the Child Welfare System. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Social Policy.
31.
KeiserL. R.SossJ. (1998). With good cause: Bureaucratic discretion and the politics of child support enforcement. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1133–1156.
32.
LasswellH. (1936). Politics; who gets what, when, how. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
LipskyM. (2010). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. 30th anniversary expanded edition. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
MillerA. B.CrossT. P. (2006). Ethnicity in child maltreatment research: A replication of Behl et al.’s content analysis. Child Maltreatment, 11, 16–26. doi:10.1177/1077559505278272
36.
MoineddinR.MathesonF.GlazierR. (2007). A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 34–46. Retrieved fromhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/7/34
37.
MyersJ. E. (2011). Criminal prosecution of child maltreatment. In MyersJ. E. (Ed.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment. (3rd ed., pp. 87–99). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
NewbergerE. (1987). Prosecution: A problematic approach to child abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 112–117. doi:10.1177/088626087002001009
40.
NewmanB. S.DannenfelserP. L. (2005). Children’s protective services and law enforcement: Fostering partnerships in investigations of child abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 14, 97–111. doi:10.1300/J070v14n02 06
41.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2000). Forming a multidisciplinary team to investigate child abuse. Portable Guides to Investigating Child Abuse. NCJ 170020. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
PenceD. M. (2011). Child abuse and neglect investigation. In MyersJ. (Ed.), The APSAC handbook of child maltreatment. (3rd ed., pp. 325–335). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
43.
PenceD.WilsonC. (1994). Team investigation of child sexual abuse: The uneasy alliance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
SedlakA. J.SchultzD.WellsS. J.LyonsP.DoueckH. J.GraggF. (2006). Child protection and justice systems processing of serious child abuse and neglect cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 657–677. doi:10.1177/1049731505277947
47.
SheppardD.ZangrilloP. (1996). Coordinating investigations of child abuse: A summary report. Public Welfare, 54, 21–32.
48.
SkoganW.FrydlK. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
49.
SmithB.TestaM. (2002). The risk of subsequent maltreatment allegations in families with substance-exposed infants. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 97–114.
50.
SosinM. R. (2010). Discretion in human service organizations: Traditional and institutional perspectives. In HasenfeldY. (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 381–403). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
51.
StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12. College Station, TX: Author.
52.
StataCorp. (2005). Users guide: Version 9.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
TjadenP. G.AnhaltJ. (1994). The impact of joint law enforcement-child protective services investigations in child maltreatment cases. Denver, CO: Center for Policy Research.
55.
TjadenP. G.ThoennesN. (1992). Predictors of legal intervention in child maltreatment cases. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 807–821. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(92)90083-4
56.
WeisheitR.FalconeD.WellsL.E. (1996). Crime and policing in rural and small town America. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
57.
YampolskayaS.BanksS. (2006). An assessment of child maltreatment using administrative databases. Assessment, 13, 342–355. doi:10.1177/1073191106290607
