Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines how drug market activities place children at risk of maltreatment over space and time. Data were collected for 95 Census tracts in Sacramento, California, over 7 years and were analyzed using Bayesian space–time models. Referrals for child maltreatment investigations were less likely to occur in places where current drug market activity was present. However, past-year local and spatially lagged drugs sales were positively related to referrals. After the investigative phase, Census tracts with more drug sales had higher numbers of substantiations, and those with more possessions also had more entries into foster care. The temporal delay between drug sales and child maltreatment referrals may indicate that the surveillance systems designed to protect children may not be responsive to changing neighborhood conditions or be indicative of the time it takes for the detrimental effects of the drug use to appear.

Keywords

child maltreatment drug activity drug markets child abuse and neglect spatial analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alaniz

M. L.

Cartmill

R. S.

Parker

R. N.

(1998). Immigrants & violence: The importance of neighborhood context. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20, 155–174.

Albert

V. N.

Barth

R. P.

(1996). Predicting growth in child abuse and neglect reports in urban, suburban, and rural counties. Social Service Review, 70, 58–82.

Banerjee

LaScala

Gruenewald

P.J.

Freisthler

Treno

Remer

L.G.

(2008). Social disorganization, alcohol and other drug markets and violence: A space-time model of community structure. In Thomas

Y.F.

Richardson

Cheung

(eds.) Geography and Drug Addiction, pp. 117–130. New York, NY: Springer.

Cliff

A. D.

Ord

J. K.

(1973). Spatial autocorrelation, monographs in spatial environmental systems analysis. London, England: Pion Limited.

Ford

Beveridge

A. A

. (2004). ‘Bad’ neighborhoods, fast food, ‘sleazy’ businesses and drug dealers: Relations between the location of licit and illicit businesses in the urban environment. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 51–76.

Ford

Beveridge

A. A.

(2006). Neighborhood crime victimization, drug use and drug sales: Results from the ‘Fighting Back’ evaluation. Journal of Drug Issues, 36, 393–416.

Freisthler

(2004). A spatial analysis of social disorganization, alcohol access, and rates of child maltreatment in neighborhoods. Child and Youth Services Review, 26, 803–819.

Freisthler

Gruenewald

P. J.

Johnson

F. W.

Treno

A. J.

LaScala

E. A.

(2005). An exploratory study examining the spatial dynamics of illicit drug availability and rates of drug use. Journal of Drug Education, 35, 15–27.

Freisthler

Gruenewald

P. J.

Remer

L. G.

Lery

Needell

(2007). Exploring the spatial dynamics of alcohol outlets and child protective services referrals, substantiations, and foster care entries. Child Maltreatment, 12, 114–124.

10.

Freisthler

LaScala

E. A.

Gruenewald

P. J.

Treno

A. J.

(2005). An examination of drug activity: Effects of neighborhood social organization on the development of drug distribution systems. Substance Use and Misuse, 40, 671–686.

11.

Freisthler

Merritt

D. H.

LaScala

E. A.

(2006). Understanding the ecology of child maltreatment: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Child Maltreatment, 11, 263–280.

12.

Freisthler

Needell

Gruenewald

P. J.

(2005). Is the physical availability of alcohol and illicit drugs related to neighborhood rates of child maltreatment? Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 1049–1060.

13.

Freisthler

Weiss

R. E.

(2008). Using Bayesian space-time models to understand the substance use environment and risk for being referred to child protective services. Substance Use & Misuse Special Issue, 43, 239–251.

14.

Geolytics

Inc

. (2006) Annual estimates professional 2001-2005–California. East Brunswick, NJ: GeoLytics.

15.

Gorman

D. M.

Zhu

Horel

(2005). Drug “Hot Spot,” alcohol availability and violence. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 507–513.

16.

Gruenewald

P.J.

( in press, 2011). Geospatial analyses of alcohol and drug problems: empirical needs and theoretical foundations. Geojournal, [online early, August 13, 2011]

17.

Gruenewald

P. J.

Johnson

F. W.

Ponicki

W. R.

Remer

L. G.

LaScala

E. A

. (2010). Assessing correlates of the growth and extent of methamphetamine abuse and dependence in California. Substance Use and Misuse, 45, 1948–1970.

18.

Jones

Pebley

A. R.

Sastry

(2011). Eyes on the block: Measuring urban physical disorder through in-person observation. Social Science Research, 40, 523–537.

19.

Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts. (2000). Caregivers and the courts: A primer on juvenile dependency proceedings for California foster parents and relative caregivers. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from http://www.fosteryouthhelp.ca.gov/PDFs/Caregiver.pdf

20.

LaScala

E. A.

Freisthler

Gruenewald

P. J.

(2005). Population ecologies of drug use, drinking and related problems. In Stockwell

Gruenewald

P. J.

Toumbourou

Loxley

(Eds.), Preventing harmful substance use: The evidence base for policy and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley.

21.

Petronis

K. R.

Anthony

J. C.

(2003). A different kind of contextual effect: geographical clustering of cocaine incidence in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 893–900.

22.

Sampson

R. J.

Raudenbush

Earls

(1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.

23.

Saxe

Kadushin

Beveridge

Livert

Tighe

Rindskopf

Brodsky

. (2001). The visibility of illicit drugs: Implications for community-based drug control strategies, American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1987–1994.

24.

Simpson

D. G.

Imrey

P. B.

Geling

Butkus

(2000). Statistical estimation of child abuse rates from administrative databases. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 951–971.

25.

Thomas

Best

Arnold

Spiegelhalter

. (2002). GeoBUGS user manual, v. 1.1 Beta. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unite, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge University website: http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs

26.

US Census Bureau. (1994). Geographic areas reference manual. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.

27.

Weisburd

Mazerolle

L. G.

(2000). Crime and disorder in drug hot spots: Implications for theory and practice in policing. Police Quarterly, 3, 331–349.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

11.14 MB

The Geography of Drug Market Activities and Child Maltreatment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material