Little is known about the influence of evidentiary and case characteristics on adverse appeal outcomes for substantiated cases of maltreatment. This article, therefore, reports on a sample of adverse appeal outcomes during a 2-year period. Using Drake's Harm/Evidence model to examine the adverse outcomes, the study describes differences between substantiated cases that were “modified” versus “overturned” during appeal, as well as differences in their evidentiary characteristics across different types of maltreatment. Content analysis and logistic regression analysis of administrative data were used to predict overturned versus modified outcome. Overall, child neglect, substantiated cases that did not meet basic evidentiary standards, and cases that were deemed as not credible were more likely to be overturned in comparison to being modified. A substantiation assessment framework (SAF) is developed and implications of Drake's Harm/Evidence model for investigating maltreatment as well as for understanding judicial decision making in appealed cases of maltreatment is highlighted.
Arizona Department of Health Services. (2001 ). Arizona citizen review panel: Third annual report. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from www.azdhs.gov/phs/owch/pdf/cr01_report.pdf
2.
Arizona Office of the Auditor General. (2002 ). A report to the Arizona legislature. Retrieved April 5, 2007, http://www.azauditor.gov/Reports/State_Agencies/Agencies/Economic_Security,_Department_of/Performance/02-10/pa02-10.htm
3.
Barnett, D., Manly, J.T., & Cicchetti, D. (1993). Defining child maltreatment: The interface between policy and research. In D. Cicchetti & S. L. Toth (Eds.), Child abuse, child development, and social policy (pp. 7-73). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Beichner, D., & Spohn, C. (2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases: Examining the impact of a specialized prosecution unit. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 461-498.
5.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2007). Definitions of child abuse and neglect: Summary of state laws. Retrieved April 11, 2007, from www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/defineall.pdf
6.
Committee on Child Abuse & Neglect. (2002 ). When inflicted skin injuries constitute child abuse. Pediatrics, 110, 644-645.
7.
Coohey, C. (2003a). Making judgments about risk in substantiated cases of supervisory neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 821-840.
8.
Coohey, C. (2003b). Defining and classifying supervisory neglect . Child Maltreatment, 8, 145-156.
9.
Cross, T.P., Martell, D., McDonald, E., & Ahl, M. (1999). The criminal justice system and child placement in child sexual abuse cases. Child Maltreatment, 4, 32-44.
10.
Department of Health and Family Services. ( 2003). Wisconsin child abuse and neglect report. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from www.dhfs.wisconsin.gov/cwreview/reports.htm
11.
Drake, B. (1995). Associations between reporter type and assessment outcome in child protective services referrals. Children and Youth Services Review, 17, 503-522.
12.
Drake, B. (1996). Unraveling "Unsubstantiated." Child Maltreatment, 1, 261-271.
13.
Drake, B., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2000). Substantiation and early decision points in public child welfare: A conceptual reconsideration. Child Maltreatment, 5, 227-235.
14.
Drake, B., Jonson-Reid, M., Way, I., & Chung, S. (2003). Substantiation and recidivism. Child Maltreatment, 6, 248-260.
15.
Dubowitz, H., Pitts, S.C., Litrownik, A.J., Cox, C.E., Runyan, D., & Black, M.M. (2005). Defining child neglect based on child protective services data. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 493-511.
16.
Eckenrode, J., Powers, J., Doris, J., Munsch, J., & Bolger, N. (1988). Substantiation of child abuse and neglect reports . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 9-16.
17.
English, D.J., Brummel, S.C., Graham, J.C., & Coghlan, L.K. (2002). Factors that influence the decision not to substantiate a CPS referral. Olympia, WA: Department of Social and Health Services.
18.
English, D.J., Thompson, R., Graham, C.J., & Briggs, E.C. (2005). Toward a definition of neglect in young children . Child Abuse & Neglect, 10, 190-206.
19.
Finkelhor, D., & Jones, M.L. (2004). Explanations for the decline in child sexual abuse cases. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/199298.pdf
20.
Giovannoni, J. (1989). Substantiated and unsubstantiated reports of child maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 17, 465-470.
21.
Giovannoni, J. (1991). Unsubstantiated reports: Perspectives of child protection workers. Children and Youth Services, 15, 51-62.
Jason, J., Andereck, N., Marks, J., & Tyler, C. (1982). Child abuse in Georgia: A method to evaluate risk factors and reporting bias. American Journal of Public Health , 72, 1353-1358.
24.
Jones, M.L., & Finkelhor, D. (2001). The decline in child sexual abuse cases. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/184741.pdf
25.
Jones, M.L., Finkelhor, D., & Kopiec, K. (2001). Why is sexual abuse declining? A survey of state child protection administrators. Child Abuse & Neglect , 25, 1139-1158.
26.
Karski, R.L. (1999). Key decisions in child protective services: Report of investigation and court referral. Children and Youth Services Review, 21, 643-656.
27.
Leiter, J., Myers, K.A., & Zingraff, M.T. (1994). Substantiated and unsubstantiated cases of child maltreatment: Do their consequences differ? Social Work Research, 18, 67-78.
28.
Manly, J.T. (2005). Advances in research definitions of child maltreatment . Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 425-439.
29.
Mildred, J. (2003). Claimsmakers in the child sexual abuse "wars": Who are they and what do they want? Social Work, 48, 492-504.
Office of the State Auditor of Missouri. ( 2000). Audit of child abuse and neglect reporting and response system. Retrieved April 11, 2007, from http://www.auditor.mo.gov/press/2000-132.htm
32.
Peng, C.Y.J., Lee, K.L., & Ingersoll, G.M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 3-14.
33.
Sedlack, A.J., & Broadhurst, D.D. (1996). The third national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS-3). Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
34.
Sedlak, A.J., Schultz, D., Wells, S.J., Lyons, P., Doueck, H.J., & Gragg, F. (2006). Child protection and justice systems processing of serious child abuse and neglect cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 657-677.
35.
Slep, A.M.S., & Heyman, R.E. (2006). Creating and field-testing child maltreatment definitions: Improving the reliability of substantiation determinations. Child Maltreatment, 11, 217-236.
Trocmé, N., MacMillan, H., Fallon, B., & De Marco, R. (2003). Nature and severity of physical harm caused by child abuse and neglect: Results from the Canadian incidence study. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 169, 911-915.
38.
University of Maryland Baltimore Institutional Review Board. (2008). HRRP policies & procedures manual . Baltimore: University of Maryland Baltimore.
39.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 1998). Appeals requirement. Retrieved January 27, 2007, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/laws_policies/policy/pi/pi9808.htm
40.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2003). National study of child protective services systems and reform efforts: Review of state CPS policy. Retrieved January 27, 2007, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/cps-status03/state-policy03/
41.
Winefield, H.R., & Bradley, P.W. (1992). Substantiation of reported child abuse or neglect: Predictors and implications. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 661-671.
