This article explores the length of time between key events in the criminal prosecution of child sexual abuse cases (charging decision, case resolution process, and total case-processing time), which previous research suggests is related to victims' recovery. The sample included 160 cases in three communities served by the Dallas County District Attorney. Most cases (69%) took at least 60 days for the charging decision, with cases investigated at the Children's Advocacy Center having a quicker time than either comparison community. Only 20% of cases had a case resolution time within the 180-day target suggested by the American Bar Association standard for felonies. Controlling for case characteristics, one of the three communities and cases with an initial arrest had a significantly quicker case resolution time. Total case processing generally took more than 2 years. Implications include the need to better monitor and shorten case resolution time.
American Bar Association. (2004). Building a better court: Measuring and improving court performance and judicial workload in child abuse and neglect cases. Reno, NV: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.
2.
American Prosecutors Research Institute. ( 2004). Investigation and prosecution of child abuse (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, S.L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Cross, T., Jones, L., Walsh, W., Simone, M., & Kolko, D. (in press). Child forensic interviewing in Children's Advocacy Centers: Empirical data on a practice model. Child Abuse & Neglect .
5.
Cross, T.P., Jones, L.M., Walsh, W.A., Simone, M., Cryns, A., Kolko, D.J., et al. (in press). The multi-site evaluation of Children's Advocacy Centers: Overview of the results and implications for practice (Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
6.
Cross, T.P., Walsh, W.A., Simone, M., & Jones, L.M. (2003). Prosecution of child abuse: A meta-analysis of rates of criminal justice decisions. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,4(4), 323-340.
7.
Davidson, H.A. (1997). The courts and child maltreatment. In M. E. Helfer, R. S. Kempe, & D. Krugman (Eds.), The battered child (5th ed., pp. 482-499). Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Dezwirek-Sas, L. (1992). Empowering child witnesses for sexual abuse prosecution . In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds.), Children as witnesses (pp. 181-199). New York: John Wiley.
9.
Dodge, H., & Pankey, K. (2003). Case processing time standards in state courts, 2002-03: Knowledge & information services. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
10.
Elstein, S.G., & Davis, N. (1997). Sexual relationships between adult males and young teen girls: Exploring the legal and social responses. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.
11.
Finkelhor, D. (1983). Removing the child—Prosecuting the offender in cases of sexual abuse: Evidence from the National Reporting System for Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7, 195-205.
12.
Gilstrap, L.L., & Ceci, S. (2005). Reconceptualizing children's suggestibility: Bidirectional and temporal properties, Child Development, 76(1), 40-53.
13.
Goodman, G.S., Quas, J.A., Bulkley, J., & Shapiro, C. (1999). Innovations for child witnesses: A national survey . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,5(2), 255-281.
14.
Gray, E. (1993). Unequal justice: The prosecution of child sexual abuse. New York: Free Press.
15.
Hamilton, L. (2006). Statistics with Stata. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
16.
Jones, L., Cross, T., Walsh, W., & Simone, M. (in press). Do Children's Advocacy Centers improve families' experiences of child sexual abuse investigations?Child Abuse & Neglect .
17.
Jones, L., Finkelhor, D., & Halter, S. (2006). Child maltreatment trends in the 1990s: Why does neglect differ from physical and sexual abuse?Child Maltreatment , 11(2), 107-120.
18.
Keilitz, S., Jones, A.M., & Ostrom, B.J. (1999). Tracking and understanding family violence caseloads . Caseload Highlights Examining the Work of State Courts,5(2). Retrieved August 14, 2007, from http://www.ncsconline.org/D_Research/csp/Highlights/PrototypeV5%20No2.pdf.
19.
Lanning, K.V. (2002). Law enforcement perspective on the compliant child victim. APSAC Advisor (Special issue),14(2), 4-9.
20.
Lee, C.G., & LaFountain, R.C. (2005). Felony caseloads in the NACM Network. Caseload Highlights Examining the Work of State Courts,12(1). Retrieved August 14, 2007, from http://www.ncsconline.org/D_Research/csp/Highlights/Vol12No.1.pdf .
21.
Lipovsky, J. (1994). The impact of court on children: Research findings and practical recommendations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 9(2), 238-257.
22.
Lipovsky, J., & Stern, P. (1997). Preparing children for court: An interdisciplinary view. Child Maltreatment, 2(2), 150-163.
23.
Martin, M.J. (1992). Child sexual abuse: Preventing continued victimization by the criminal justice system and associated agencies. Family Relations, 41, 330-333.
24.
Martone, M., Jaudes, P.K., & Cavins, M.K. (1996). Criminal prosecution of child sexual abuse cases . Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(5), 457-464.
25.
Mehta, C.R., & Patel, N.R. (1986). A hybrid algorithm for Fisher's exact test in unordered r x c contingency tables. Communications in Statistics , Series A, 15, 387-404.
26.
National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse. (n.d.). “Speedy trial” statutes for allegations involving children. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.ndaa.org/pdf/ncpca_statute_speedy_trial_statutes_chart.pdf.
27.
National Center for State Courts. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions caseflow management. Retrieved March 21, 2006, from http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/FAQ/Print/Prt_CasManFAQ.htm.
28.
National Children's Alliance. (2006). National Children's Alliance newsletter. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://66.132.242.166/uploads/SpringNewsletter2006.pdf .
29.
Ostrom, B.J., & Hanson, R.A. (2000). Efficiency, timeliness, and quality: A new perspective from nine state criminal trial courts (Research in Brief). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
30.
Pence, D., & Wilson, C. (1992). The role of law enforcement in the response to child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
31.
Prior, V., Glaser, D., & Lynch, M.A. (1997). Responding to child sexual abuse: The criminal justice system. Child Abuse Review, 6, 128-140.
32.
Quas, J.A., Goodman, G.S., Ghetti, S., Alexander, K.W., Edelstein, R., Redlich, A.D., et al., (2005). Childhood sexual assault victims: Long-term outcomes after testifying in criminal court. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(2), 1-145.
Sedlak, A.J., Doucek, H.J., Lyons, P., Wells, S., Schultz, D., & Gragg, F. (2005). Child maltreatment and the justice system: Predictors of court involvement. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(50), 389-403.
35.
Simone, M., Cross, T.P., Jones, L.M., & Walsh, W. (2005). Children's Advocacy Centers: Understanding the impact. In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. Giacomoni (Eds.), Victimization of children and youth: Patterns of abuse, response strategies (pp. 22-1-22-24). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
36.
Smith, S.E., & Elstein, G.S. (1993). The prosecution of child sexual and physical abuse cases. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education.
37.
Stroud, D.D., Martens, S.L., & Barker, J. (2000). Criminal investigation of child sexual abuse: A comparison of cases referred to the prosecutor to those not referred. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(5), 689-700.
38.
Texas Legislature. (n.d.-a). Code of criminal procedure. Retrieved August 13, 2007, from http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/cr.toc.htm.
39.
Texas Legislature. (n.d.-b). Texas statutes penal code. Retrieved August 13, 2007, from http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/pe.toc.htm.
40.
Tjaden, P.G., & Thoennes, N. (1992). Predictors of legal intervention in child maltreatment cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 807-821.
41.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2000). Attorney general guidelines for victim and witness assistance 2000 (NCJ 178249)Washington, DC: Author.
42.
Walsh, W.A., Cross, T.P., Jones, L.M., Simone, M., & Kolko, D. (in press). Which sexual abuse victims receive a forensic medical examination?: The impact of Children's Advocacy Centers. Child Abuse & Neglect.
43.
Walsh, W., Jones, L.M., & Cross, T.P. (2003). Children Advocacy Centers: One philosophy, many models. APSAC Advisor,15(3), 3—7.
44.
Walsh, W., Jones, L.M., Cross, T.P., & Lippert, T. (2007). Prosecuting child sexual abuse: The importance of evidence type. Manuscript submitted for publication.
45.
Whitcomb, D. (1992). When the victim is a child—Issues and practices in criminal justice series (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
46.
Whitcomb, D. (2003). Legal interventions for child victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(2), 149-157.
