Service Outcomes in Physical and Sexual Abuse Cases: A Comparison of Child Advocacy Center-Based and Standard Services

Abstract

Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) were developed to improve on child abuse investigative services provided by child protective service (CPS) agencies. However, until very recently, there has been little research comparing CAC-based procedures and outcomes to those in CPS investigations not based in CACs. The current study tracked 76 child abuse cases that were reported to authorities and investigated through either a private, not-for-profit CAC or typical CPS services in a mid-south rural county. Comparisons between CAC and CPS cases were made in terms of involvement of local law enforcement in the investigation, provision of medical exams, abuse substantiation rates, mental health referrals, prosecution referrals, and conviction rates. Analyses revealed higher rates of law enforcement involvement, medical examinations, and case substantiation in the CAC-based cases compared to the CPS cases. Despite limitations due to sample size and nonrandomization, this study found preliminary support for the assumptions underlying the establishment of CACs.

Keywords

Child Advocacy Centers child sexual abuse child physical abuse medical examinations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, J. A. , & Wells, R. (1993). Normal versus abnormal genital finding in children: How well do examiners agree? Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 663-375.

Fergusson, D. M. , Horwood, L. J. , & Lynskey, M. T. (1996). Childhood sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood: II. Psychiatric outcomes of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1365-1374.

Jenson, J. M. , Jacobson, M. , Unrau, Y. , & Robinson, R. L. (1996). Intervention for victims of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of the children’s advocacy model. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13, 139-156.

Kinard, E. M. (1995). Mother and teacher assessments of behavior problems in abused children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 1043-1953.

Newman, B. S. , Dannenfelser, P. L. , & Pendleton, D. (2005). Child abuse investigations: Reasons for using Child Advocacy Centers and suggestions for improvement. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 22, 165-181.

Reyome, N. D. (1993). A comparison of the school performance of sexually abused, neglected and non-maltreatment children. Child Study Journal, 23, 17-38.

Robin, M. (1991). Beyond validation interviews: An assessment approach to evaluating sexual abuse allegations. Child and Youth Services, 15, 93-114.

Rodriguez, N. , Ryan, S. W. , Rowan, A. B. , & Foy, D. W. (1996). Posttraumatic stress disorder in a clinical sample of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 943-952.

Walsh, W. , Jones, L. , & Cross, T. (2003). Children’s Advocacy Centers: One philosophy, many models. APSAC Advisor, 15, 3-7.

10.

Zellman, G. L. , & Fair, C. C. (2002). Preventing and reporting abuse. In J. E. B. Myers , L. Berliner , J. Briere , C. T. Hendrix , C. Jenny , & T. A. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child mal-treatment (2nd ed., pp. 449-475). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.