This study investigated the impact of type of out-of-court disclosure in a child sexual assault case involving a 6-year-old alleged victim. Community participants read a fictional criminal trial summary of a child sexual assault case in which the alleged victim’s out-of-court disclosure of the assault was: (a) complete on two occasions or (b) incomplete at first, but later included the full account of the incident. The results showed that there were more guilty verdicts, higher ratings of the defendant’s guilt, and greater belief of the alleged victim when there was full disclosure on two occasions compared to when there was a delay in full disclosure. These results are discussed in terms of the impact the nature of out-of-court disclosure can have when a child testifies in a sexual assault case.
Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
2.
Bottoms, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G. S. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses(pp. 229-261). New York: Guilford.
3.
Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children’s credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-732.
4.
Bradley, A. R., & Wood, J. M. (1996). How do children tell? The disclosure process in child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 881-891.
5.
Bradshaw, T. L.,& Marks, A. E. (1990). Beyond a reasonable doubt: Factors that influence the legal disposition of child sexual abuse cases. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 276-285.
6.
Cooper, W. S. (1999). Kentucky instructions to juries. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
7.
Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561-571.
8.
Dillehay, R. C., & Nietzel, M. T. (1980). Constructing a science of jury behavior. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology(pp. 246-264). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Duggan, L. M., III, Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Schiener, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony(pp. 71-99). New York: Springer-Verlag.
10.
Elliott, D. M., & Briere, J. (1994). Forensic sexual abuse evaluations of older children: Disclosures and symptomology. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 261-277.
11.
Gabora, N. J., Spanos, N. P., & Joab, A. (1993). The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 103-119.
12.
Golding, J. M., Sego, S. A., Sanchez, R. P., & Hasemann, D. (1995). The believability of repressed memories. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 569-592.
13.
Golding, J. M., Stewart, T. L., Yozwiak, J. A., & Djadali, Y. (2000). The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault trial. Child Maltreatment, 5, 373-383.
14.
Goldman, R., & Goldman, J. (1984). Perception of sexual experience in childhood: Relating normal development to incest. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and Family, 5, 159-166.
15.
Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Herscovici, B. B., & Shaver, P. (1989). Determinants of the child victim’s perceived believability. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony(pp. 1-22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M.,& Haith, M. M. (1984). Jurors’ reactions to child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139-156.
17.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V., Haith, M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors’ perceptions of children’s eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 27-40.
18.
Isquith, P. K., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1993). Blaming the child: Attribution of responsibility to victims of child sexual abuse. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses(pp. 203-228). New York: Guilford.
19.
20.
Kovera, M. B., Gresham, A. W., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P. C. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision-making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178-191.
21.
Kovera, M. B., Levy, R. J., Borgida, E., & Penrod, S. D. (1994). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: Effects of expert evidence type and cross-examination. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 653-674.
22.
Lieppe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors’ preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 103-132.
23.
Myers, J. E. B. (1998). Legal issues in child abuse and neglect practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect. (2003, October 6). Child maltreatment 2001: Summary of key findings. Retrieved November 10, 2003, from http://nccanch.acf.hhs.gov/pubs/factsheets/canstats.cfm
25.
Nightingale, N. N. (1993). Juror reactions to child victim witnesses: Factors affecting trial outcome. Law and Human Behavior, 171, 679-694.
26.
Quas, J. A., Bottoms, B. L., Haegerich, T. M., & Nysse-Carris, K. L. (2002). Effects of victim, defendant and juror gender on decisions in child sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1993-2021.
27.
Redlich, A. D., Myers, J. E. B., Goodman, G. S., & Qin, J. (2002). A comparison of two forms of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Child Maltreatment, 7, 312-328.
28.
Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury. Law andHumanBehavior, 14, 5-23.
29.
Schaaf, J. M., Alexander K. W., Goodman G. S., Ghetti, S., Edelstein, R. S., & Castelli, P. (2002). Children’s eyewitness memory: True disclosures and false reports. In B. L. Bottoms, M. B. Kovera, & B. D. McAuliff (Eds.), Children, social science, and the law(pp. 342-377). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Schmidt, C. W., & Brigham, J. C. (1996). Jurors’ perceptions of child victim-witnesses in a simulated sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 581-606.
31.
Schutte, J. W., & Hosch, H. M. (1997). Gender differences in sexual assault verdicts: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 759-772.
32.
Smith, D. W., Letourneau, E. J., Saunders, B. E., Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., & Best, C. L. (2000). Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: Results from a national survey. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 273-287.
33.
Snyder, H. N. (2000, July). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics(Bureau of Justice Statistics report, NCJ 182990). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
Sorensen, T., & Snow, B. (1991). How children tell: The process of disclosure in child sexual abuse. Child Welfare, 70, 3-15.
35.
Summit, R. C. (1983). The child abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 177-193.
36.
Swim, J. K., Borgida, E., & McCoy K. (1993). Videotaped versus incourt witness testimony: Does protecting the child witness jeopardize due process?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 603-631.
37.
U. S. Census Bureau. (2003, July 15). State and county quickfacts. Retrieved November 3, 2003, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/21/21067.html
38.
Waterman, C. K., & Foss-Goodman, D. (1984). Child molesting: Variables relating to attribution of fault to victims, offenders, and nonparticipating parents. Journal of Sex Research, 20, 329-349.
