Familism, or familismo, refers to attitudes, behaviors, and family structures operating within an extended family system and is believed to be the most important factor influencing the lives of Latinos. Because of the complexity of the construct, this article begins by separating out and defining each dimension of familism, and then clarifies its relationship to the broader literature on social networks, social support, and child maltreatment. The analysis tests whether each dimension of familism is related to child maltreatment within and between 35 abusive Latino, 35 nonabusive Latino, 51 abusive Anglo, and 51 nonabusive Anglo families. Nonabusing Latinas appear to have a higher level of familism than the other three groups of mothers. However, when intraethnic comparisons were made, nonabusive Anglos, compared with abusive Anglos, had higher levels of familism on several variables. Hence, familism seems to characterize families—Latino and Anglo—who do not maltreat their children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bishop, S. J.
, & Leadbeater, B. J. (1999). Maternal social support patterns and child maltreatment: Comparison of maltreating and non-maltreating mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 172-181.
2.
Burgess, E. W
, & Locke, H. S. (1945). The family: From institution to companionship. New York: American.
3.
Coohey, C. (1993). Child maltreatment: An exchange theoretic approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
4.
Coohey, C.
(1995). Neglectful mothers, their mothers, and partners: The significance of mutual aid. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 885-895.
5.
Coohey, C.
(1996). Child maltreatment: Testing the social isolation hypothesis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 241-254.
6.
Coohey, C.
(1998). Home alone and other inadequately supervised children. Child Welfare, 77, 291-310.
7.
Coohey, C.
(2000). The role of friends, in-laws, and other kin in father-perpetrated child physical abuse. Child Welfare, 79, 373-402.
8.
Coohey, C.
, & Braun, N. (1997). Toward an integrated framework for understanding child physical abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 1081-1094.
9.
Corse, S. J.
, Schmid, K., & Trickett, P. K. (1990). Social network characteristics of mothers in abusing and nonabusing families and their relationships to parenting beliefs. Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 44-59.
10.
Crittenden, P. M.
(1985). Social networks, quality of child rearing and child development. Child Development, 56, 1299-1313.
11.
deAnda, D.
, & Becerra, R. M. (1984). Support networks for adolescent mothers. Social Casework, 65, 172-181.
12.
Delgado, R.
(1992). Generalist child welfare and Hispanic families. In N. A. Cohen (Ed.), Child welfare: A multicultural focus (pp. 130-156). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Egeland, B.
, & Brunquell, D. (1979). An at-risk approach to the study of child abuse: Some preliminary findings. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 18, 219-235.
14.
Fontes, L.
(1997). Evaluating the cultural sensitivity of child abuse research: Sampling issues. APSAC Advisor, 10, 8-10.
15.
Giovannoni, J. M.
, & Billingsley, A. (1970). Child neglect among the poor: A study of parental adequacy in families of three ethnic groups. Child Welfare, 64, 196-204.
16.
Heller, P. L.
(1976). Familism scale: Revalidation and revision. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 423-429.
17.
Keefe, S. E.
(1980). Personal communities in the city: Support networks among Mexican Americans and Anglo-Americans. Urban Anthropology, 9, 51-74.
18.
Keefe, S. E.
(1984). Real and ideal extended familism among Mexican Americans and Anglo Americans: On the meaning of “close” family ties. Human Organization, 43, 65-70.
19.
Keefe, S. E.
, Padilla, A. M., & Carlos, M. L. (1979). The Mexican American extended family as an emotional support system. Human Organization, 38, 144-152.
20.
Kotelchuck, M.
(1982). Child abuse and neglect: Prediction and misclassification. In R. Starr (Ed.), Child abuse prediction (pp. 67-104). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
21.
Levitt, M. J.
, Weber, R. A., & Clark, M. C. (1986). Intergenerational support, relationship quality, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 22, 465-481.
22.
Markides, K. S.
, Boldt, J. S., & Ray, L. A. (1986). Sources of helping and intergenerational solidarity: A three generation study of Mexican Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 911-916.
23.
Mindel, C. H.
(1980). Extended familism among urban Mexican Americans, Anglos, and Blacks. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2, 21-34.
24.
Newberger, E. H.
, Reed, R. B., Daniel, J. H., Hyde, J. N., & Kotelchuck, M. (1977). Pediatric social illness: Toward an etiologic classification. Pediatrics, 60, 178-185.
25.
Polansky, N. A.
, Ammons, P. W., & Gaudin, J. M. (1985). Loneliness and isolation in child neglect. Social Casework, 6, 38-47.
26.
Polansky, N. A.
, Chalmers, M. A., Buttenwieser, E., & Williams, D. P. (1981). Damaged parents. Chicago: University of Chicago.
27.
Polansky, N. A.
, & Gaudin, J. M. (1983). Social distancing for the neglectful family. Social Service Review, 57, 196-208.
28.
Sabogal, F.
, Marín, B., & Otero-Sabogal, R. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn't. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 397-412.
29.
Salzinger, S.
, Kaplan, S., & Artemyeff, C. (1983). Mothers' personal social networks and child maltreatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 68-76.
30.
Schaffer, D. M.
, & Wagner, R. M. (1996). Mexican American and Anglo single mothers: The influence of ethnicity, generation, and socioeconomic status on social support networks. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 74-86.
31.
Starr, R. H.
(1982). A research-based approach to the prediction of child abuse. In R. H. Starr (Eds.), Child abuse prediction (pp. 105-134). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
32.
Thompson, R. A.
(1995). Preventing child maltreatment through social support: A critical analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Tietjen, A.
(1985). The social networks and social support of married and single mothers in Sweden. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 489-496.
34.
Valenzuela, S. M.
, & Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Familism and social capital in the academic achievement of Mexican origin and Anglo adolescents. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 18-36.
35.
Vernon, S. W.
, & Roberts, R. E. (1985). A comparison of Anglos and Mexican Americans on selected measures on social support. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 7, 381-399.
36.
Wellman, B.
(1991). Which types of ties and networks provide which kinds of social support? Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto, Canada.
37.
Wolock, I.
, & Horowitz, B. (1979). Child maltreatment and material deprivation among AFDC-recipient families. Social Service Review, 53, 175-194.
38.
Zayas, L. H.
(1992). Childrearing, social stress, and child abuse: Clinical considerations with Hispanic families. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 1, 291-309.
39.
Zuravin, S. J.
, & Starr, R. H. (1987). Psychosocial characteristics of mothers of physically abused and neglected children: Do they differ by race? In R. Hampton (Ed.), Black family violence (pp. 35-71). Lexington, MA: Lexington.
