Identification and evaluation of child sexual abuse is an integral task for clinicians. To aid these processes, it is necessary to have reliable and valid psychological measures. This is an investigation of the clinical validity and use of the House-Tree-Person (HTP) projective drawing, a widely used diagnostic tool, in the assessment of child sexual abuse. HTP drawings were collected archivally from a sample of sexually abused children (n = 47) and a nonabused comparison sample (n = 82). The two samples were grossly matched for gender, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic status. The protocols were scored using a quantitative scoring system. The data were analyzed using a discriminant function analysis. Group membership could not be predicted based on a total HTP score.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berliner, L.
, & Loftus, E. (1992). Sexual abuse accusations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 570-578.
2.
Black, F. W.
(1976). The size of human figure drawings of learning disabled children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 736-741.
3.
Buck, J. N.
(1948). The HTP technique: A qualitative and quantitative scoring manual. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 317-396.
4.
Burns, R. C.
, & Kaufman, S. M. (1970). Kinetic Family Drawing (K-F-D): An introduction to understanding children through kinetic drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
5.
Cohen, F. W.
, & Phelps, R. E. (1985). Incest markers in children's artwork. Arts in Psychotherapy, 12, 265-283.
6.
Elin, N.
, & Nucho, A. O. (1979). The use of kinetic family drawing as a diagnostic tool in assessing the child's self-concept. Art Psychotherapy, 6, 241-247.
7.
Feher, E.
, Vandecreek, L., & Teglasi, H. (1983). The problem of art quality in the human figure drawing tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 268-274.
8.
Finkelhor, D.
(1979). Sexually victimized children. New York: Free Press.
9.
Gall, M. D.
, Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
10.
Goodenough, F.
(1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: World Book.
11.
Hagood, M. H.
(1992). Diagnosis or dilemma: Drawings of sexually abused children. British Journal of Projective Psychology, 37, 22-33.
12.
Hammer, M.
, & Kaplan, A. M. (1966). The reliability of children's human figure drawings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 316-319.
13.
Heiman, G. W.
(1999). Research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
Hibbard, R. N.
, & Hartman, G. L. (1990). Emotional indicators in human figure drawings of sexually victimized and nonabused children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 211-218.
15.
Hibbard, R. A.
, Roghmann, K., & Hoekelman, R. A. (1987). Genitalia in children's drawings: An association with sexual abuse. Pediatrics, 79, 129-136.
16.
King, G. F.
(1960). Recent developments in the field of projective drawings. In A. I. Rabin & M. R. Hayworth (Eds.), Projective techniques with children (pp. 364-375). New York: Gruner & Stratton.
17.
Kelley, S. J.
(1984). The use of art therapy with sexually abused children. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services, 22, 12-18.
18.
Koppitz, E. M.
(1966a). Emotional indicators on human figure drawings of children: A validation study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 313-315.
19.
Koppitz, E. M.
(1966b). Emotional indicators on human figure drawings of shy and aggressive children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 466-467.
20.
Koppitz, E. M.
(1984). Psychological evaluation of human figure drawings by middle school pupils. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
Lingren, R. H.
(1971). An attempted replication of emotional indicators in human drawings by shy and aggressive children. Psychological Reports, 29, 35-38.
22.
National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect
. (1988). Study of national incidents and prevalence of child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: GPO.
23.
Neale, E. L.
, Rosal, M., & Rosal, M. L. (1993). What can art therapists learn from the research on projective drawing techniques for children?: A review of the literature. Arts in Psychotherapy, 20, 37-49.
24.
Prytula, R. E.
, & Thompson, N. D. (1973). Analysis of emotional indicators in human figure drawings as related to self-esteem. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 795-802.
25.
Sidun, N. M.
, Rosenthal, A., & Rosenthal, R. H. (1987). Graphic indicators of sexual abuse in Draw-a-Person tests of psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents. Arts in Psychotherapy, 14, 25-33.
26.
Van Hutton, V.
(1994). House-Tree-Person and Draw-a-Person as measures of abuse in children: A quantitative scoring system. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
27.
Vass, Z.
(1998). The inner formal structure of the H-T-P drawings: An exploratory study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 611-619.
28.
Walsh, W. B.
, & Betz, N. E. (1995). Tests and assessment (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Wolfe, V., Gentile, C., & Bourdeau, P. (1986). History of victimization questionnaire. (Available from Vicky Veitch Wolfe, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, 800 Commissioners Rd., London, Ont. N6A4G5)
30.
Yates, A.
, Beutler, L. E., & Crago, M. (1985). Drawings of child victims of incest. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 183-189.
