This article addresses child maltreatment law's use of cultural evidence. Such evidence, offered by immigrant and nonmainstream parents accused of child maltreatment, serves to mitigate intervention in families or to minimize punishment for the offense. The article explores how the two areas of law that currently regulate child maltreatment—criminal and child welfare law—approach the use of such evidence. Civil, child welfare law tends to formally accept and allow for the use of cultural evidence. Criminal law rejects cultural evidence to mount a formal cultural defense that would automatically exempt individuals from punishment for criminal acts, but the system still allows cultural evidence to affect legal decisions. How both systems actually use cultural evidence in practice, however, remains to be determined. The article offers an approach to encourage both legal systems to evaluate and consider cultural evidence more systematically and critically. The analysis also addresses likely objections to the proposed alternatives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banks, R. R.
(1998). The color of desire: Fulfilling adoptive parents' racial preferences through discriminatory state action. Yale Law Journal, 107, 875-964.
2.
Berger, L.
(1994, August 24). Learning to tell custom from abuse. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
3.
Bottoms, B. L.
, Shaver, P. R., Goodman, G. S., & Quin, J. (1995). In the name of God: A profile of religion-related child abuse. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 85-111.
4.
Cardillo, C. C.
(1997). Violence against Chinese women: Defining the cultural role. Women's Rights Law Reporter, 19, 85-96.
5.
Coleman, D. L.
(1996). Individualizing justice through multiculturalism: The liberals' dilemma. Columbia Law Review, 96, 1093-1107.
6.
Crenshaw, K.
(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
7.
Crossette, B.
(1999, March 6). Testing the limits of tolerance as cultural mix. New York Times, pp. A15, A17.
8.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
9.
Dershowitz, A.
(1994). The abuse excuse. Boston: Little, Brown.
10.
Falk, P. J.
(1996). Novel theories of criminal defense based upon the toxicity of the social environment: Urban psychosis, television intoxication, and black rage. North Carolina Law Review, 74, 731-811.
11.
Feld, B. C.
(1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Feldman, K. W.
(1984). Pseudoabusive burns in Asian refugees. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 138, 768-769.
13.
Feldman, K. W.
(1995). Letter to the editor. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 657-658.
14.
Fischer, M.
(1998). The human rights implications of a cultural defense. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 6, 663-702.
15.
Fletcher, G. P.
(1995). With justice for some: Victims' rights in criminal trials. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Gallin, A. J.
(1994). The cultural defense: Undermining the policies against domestic violence. Boston College Law Review, 35, 723-745.
17.
Gallagher, B. D.
(1997). A brief legal history of institutionalized child abuse. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 17, 1-30.
18.
Gershoff, E. T.
, Miller, P. C., & Holden, G. W. (1999). Parenting influences from the pulpit: Religious affiliation as a determinant of parental corporal punishment. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 307-320.
19.
Glisson, C.
(1996). Judicial and service decisions for children entering state custody: The limited role of mental health. Social Service Review, 70, 257-281.
20.
Goldstein, T. F.
(1994). Cultural conflict in court: Should the American criminal justice system formally recognize a “cultural defense?”Dickinson Law Review, 99, 141-168.
21.
Gordon, J.
(1995). We make the road by walking: Immigrant workers, the Workplace Project, and the struggle for social change. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Law Review, 30, 407-450.
22.
Gunning, I. R.
(1992). Arrogant perception, world-travelling and multicultural feminism: The case of female genital surgeries. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 23, 189-248.
23.
Haley, S. L.
(1996). The parental tort immunity doctrine: Is it a defensible defense?University of Richmond Law Review, 30, 575-604.
24.
Hammel, P.
(1997, April 5). Arranged marriage case heard Iraqi parents plead no contest to neglect. Omaha World Herald, p. 1.
25.
Hansen, K. K.
(1997). Folk remedies and child abuse: A review with emphasis on caida de mollera and its relationship to shaken baby syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 117-127.
26.
Henderson, L.
(1998). Co-opting compassion: The federal victim's rights movement. St. Thomas Law Review, 10, 579-606.
27.
Hernández-Tryol, B. E.
(1998). Las olvidadas—gendered in justice/gendered injustice: Latinas, fronteras and the law. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 1, 354-404.
28.
Indian Child Welfare Act, § 29 U.S.C. 1901-63 (1994).
29.
Jacobson, S.
(1995, November 29). Questions persist. Dallas Morning News, p. 1A.
30.
James, A.
, Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
Kim, R.
(1998, May 5). Clash of cultures: Koreans urge leniency in case of locked-up teen. Newsday, p. A7.
32.
Korbin, J.
(1997). Culture and child maltreatment. In M. E. Helfer, R. S. Kempe, & R. D. Krugman (Eds.), The battered child (5th rev. ed., pp. 29-48). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Lane, L. L.
(1998). The parental rights movement. University of Colorado Law Review, 69, 825-849.
Levesque, R.J.R.
(1995a). The failures of foster care reform: Revolutionizing the most radical blueprint. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6(1), 1-35.
36.
Levesque, R.J.R.
(1995b). Prosecuting sex crimes against children: Time for “outrageous” proposals?Law & Psychology Review, 19, 59-91.
37.
Levesque, R.J.R.
(1998). Emotional maltreatment in adolescents' everyday lives: Furthering sociolegal and social service provisions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 237-263.
38.
Levesque, R.J.R.
(1999a). Child sexual abuse: A human rights perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
39.
Levesque, R.J.R.
(1999b). Piercing the family's private veil: Family violence, international human rights, and the cross-cultural record. Law & Policy, 21, 161-187.
40.
Levesque, R.J.R.
(in press). Culture and family violence: Fostering change through human rights law. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41.
Maguigan, H.
(1995). Cultural evidence and male violence: Are feminist and multiculturalist reformers on a collision course in criminal courts?New York University Law Review, 70, 36-39.
42.
Mosteller, R. P.
(1996). Syndromes and politics in criminal trials and evidence law. Duke Law Journal, 46, 461-516.
43.
National Research Council
. (1993). Understanding child abuse & neglect. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44.
Parham v. J. R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979).
45.
People v. Wu, 286 Cal. Rptr. 868 (1991).
46.
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).
47.
Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1943).
Renteln, A. D.
(1993). A justification of the cultural defense as partial excuse. Southern California Review of Law & Women's Studies, 2, 437-526.
50.
Rimonte, N.
(1991). A question of culture: Cultural approval of violence against women in the Pacific Asian Community and the cultural defense. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1311-1326.
51.
Risser, A. L.
, & Mazur, L. J. (1995). Use of folk remedies in a Hispanic population. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 149, 978-981.
52.
Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44 (1987).
53.
Rosaldo, E.
(1993). Culture & truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon.
54.
Sagi, A.
, Ben-Mier, P., & Bibi, C. (1988). Burn hazard from cupping—an ancient universal medication still in practice. Burns, 14, 323-325.
55.
Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982).
56.
Slobogin, C.
(1998). Psychiatric evidence in criminal trials: To junk or not to junk. William & Mary Law Review, 40, 1-56.
57.
Sussman, E.
(1998). Contending with culture: An analysis of the Female Genital Mutilation Act of 1996. Cornell International Law Journal, 31, 193-250.
58.
Taylor, T.
(1997). The cultural defense and its irrelevancy in child protection law. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 17, 331-364.
59.
Tingus, K. D.
, Heger, A. H., Foy, D., & Leskin, G. A. (1996). Factors associated with entry into therapy in children evaluated for sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 63-68.
60.
Volpp, L.
(1996). Talking “culture”: Gender, race, nation, and the politics of multiculturalism. Columbia Law Review, 96, 1573-1617.
61.
Waldfogel, J.
(1998). The future of child protection: How to break the cycle of abuse & neglect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Wang, K.
(1996). Battered Asian American women: Community responses form the battered women's movement and the Asian American community. Asian Law Journal, 3, 151-184.
63.
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).
64.
Zellman, G. L.
(1992). The impact of case characteristics on child abuse reporting decisions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 57-74.
