Abstract
All-payer claims databases (APCDs) comprise claims from multiple payers that can be traced to a single patient. To correctly estimate cost-sharing for an individual patient, we developed an algorithm to reconcile payments from secondary and tertiary payers to claims that are not fully covered by primary insurance. In a Colorado APCD cancer cohort (n = 70,100), reconciliation of claims across multiple payers markedly lowered estimated cost-sharing for patients with more than one source of coverage ($5,544 (no reconciliation); $5,013 (primary payer only) to $1,580). The largest reductions in cost-sharing after reconciliation were for individuals with Traditional Medicare with Medigap ($6,449→$1,123; Δ = −$5,326), dual Medicare-Medicaid ($4,439→$2,340; Δ = −$2,099), and Medicaid-commercial ($2,708→$2,009; Δ = −$699). Excluding secondary payments from estimates of cost-sharing systematically inflates cost-sharing estimates. A transparent reconciliation algorithm is necessary to correctly estimate cost-sharing and is recommended for researchers and policymakers who use the APCD for estimating costs across payers and to the patient.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
