Contracting between private health plans and hospitals has been described as “chaos behind a veil of secrecy.” We develop a novel algorithm that classifies inpatient claims as one of three contract types—discounted charges, fixed rates, or per diems—and apply it to the 2009-2014 Colorado All Payer Claims Database. Of $1.1 billion in classifiable private health plan payments for inpatient care in Colorado, we find that 42.1% were fixed rates, 41.1% were discounted charges, and 16.0% were per diems. We find wide variation in contract types among private health plans and hospital types, and a pronounced shift over the study period in private plans’ contract types, away from discounted charges, and toward fixed rates. To test our algorithm’s validity, we apply it to Colorado Medicare and Medicaid claims—both of which are known primarily to pay using fixed rates—and find, reassuringly, that 86.3% of Medicare payments (98.6% when we exclude Medicare claims with special payment rules) and 79.7% of Medicaid payments are classified as fixed rates.
AdidaE.MamaniH.NassiriS. (2016). Bundled payment vs. fee-for-service: Impact of payment scheme on performance. Management Science, 63, 1606-1624.
2.
BaiG.AndersonG. F. (2016). US hospitals are still using chargemaster markups to maximize revenues. Health Affairs, 35, 1658-1664.
3.
BakerL.BundorfM. K.DevlinA.KesslerD. P. (2016). Why don’t commercial health plans use prospective payment? (Working Paper No. w22709). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
BaumA.SongZ.LandonB. E.PhillipsR. S.BittonA.BasuS. (2019). Health care spending slowed after Rhode Island applied affordability standards to commercial insurers. Health Affairs, 38, 237-245. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05164
5.
BerensonR. A.SunshineJ. H.HelmsD.LawtonE. (2015). Why Medicare Advantage plans pay hospitals traditional Medicare prices. Health Affairs, 34, 1289-1295. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1427
BurwellS. M. (2015). Setting value-based payment goals: HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 897-899.
8.
CareyK.LinM. Y. (2015). Readmissions to New York hospitals fell for three target conditions from 2008 to 2012, consistent with Medicare goals. Health Affairs, 34, 978-985. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1408
ClemensJ.GottliebJ. D.MolnárT. L. (2017). Do health insurers innovate? Evidence from the anatomy of physician payments. Journal of Health Economics, 55, 153-167.
CooperZ.CraigS. V.GaynorM.Van ReenenJ. (2015). The price ain’t right? Hospital prices and health spending on the privately insured (Working Paper No. w21815). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
13.
CooperZ.CraigS. V.GaynorM.Van ReenenJ. (2019). The price ain’t right? Hospital prices and health spending on the privately insured. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134, 51-107. doi:10.1093/qje/qjy020
14.
CoulamR. F.GaumerG. L. (1991). Medicare’s prospective payment system: A critical appraisal. Health Care Financing Review, (Annual Suppl.), 45-77.
Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2016 Rates; Revisions of Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers, Including Changes Related to the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; Extensions of the Medicare-Dependent, Small Rural Hospital Program and the Low-Volume Payment Adjustment for Hospitals; Final Rule. Federal Register, 80(158), 49325-49843.
17.
FranziniL.WhiteC.TaychakhoonavudhS.ParikhR.ZezzaM.MikhailO. (2014). Variation in inpatient hospital prices and outpatient service quantities drive geographic differences in private spending in Texas. Health Services Research, 49, 1944-1963.
Ganduglia CazabanC.KimY.GoodmanD. C.AvritscherE. B.VogelB.FranziniL. (2019). Role of prices, utilization, and health in explaining Texas Medicaid newborn care spending variation. Medical Care, 57, 131-137.
20.
GinsburgP. B. (2010). Wide variation in hospital and physician payment rates evidence of provider market power. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change.
21.
GowrisankaranG.NevoA.TownR. (2014). Mergers when prices are negotiated: Evidence from the hospital industry. American Economic Review, 105, 172-203.
MartinA. B.HartmanM.WashingtonB.CatlinA., & National Health Expenditure Accounts Team. (2017). National health spending: Faster growth in 2015 as coverage expands and utilization increases. Health Affairs, 36, 166-176.
26.
MayesR.BerensonR. A. (2006). Medicare prospective payment and the shaping of U.S. health care. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
McClellanM. (1997). Hospital reimbursement incentives: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6, 91-128.
28.
MechanicR. E.AltmanS. H. (2009). Payment reform options: Episode payment is a good place to start. Health Affairs, 28, w262-w271. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w262
QuinnK. (2015). The 8 basic payment methods in health care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 163, 300-306.
35.
ReinhardtU. E. (2006). The pricing of U.S. hospital services: Chaos behind a veil of secrecy. Health Affairs, 25, 57-69.
36.
SorensenA. T. (2003). Insurer-hospital bargaining: Negotiated discounts in post-deregulation Connecticut. Journal of Industrial Economics, 51, 469-490.
37.
TompkinsC. P.AltmanS. H.EilatE. (2006). The precarious pricing system for hospital services. Health Affairs, 25, 45-56.
38.
WhiteC. (2012). Health status and hospital prices key to regional variation in private health care spending (Research Brief No. 7). Washington, DC: National Institute for Health Care Reform.
39.
WhiteC.BondA. M.ReschovskyJ. D. (2013). High and varying prices for privately insured patients underscore hospital market power (Research Brief No. 27). Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change.
40.
ZuckermanS.FederJ.HadleyJ. (1988). Hospital responses to Medicare’s prospective payment system. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 64, 52-62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
