The sharing of information among various care providers is becoming an essential feature of health care systems, and many countries are now adopting policies to foster health information exchange, defined as the electronic transfer of data or information among health care organizations involved in the delivery of care. Given the increasing adoption of this type of policy in several Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, it is important to compare experiences from different countries, because policy adoption in one country can be explained more comprehensively and coherently through comparison with similar policies adopted in other nations. To make a more meaningful cross-country comparison, this article identifies a taxonomy of health systems, and it analyzes institutional and resource-based factors related to health information exchange adoption and how they differ in three main types of health systems: the National Health Service, social health insurance, and private health insurance.
Adler-MilsteinJ.BatesD. W.JhaA. K. (2013). Operational health information exchanges show substantial growth, but long-term funding remains a concern. Health Affairs, 32, 1486-1492.
2.
Adler-MilsteinJ.JhaA. K. (2014). Health information exchange among U.S. hospitals: Who’s in, who’s out, and why?Healthcare, 2(1), 26-32.
3.
Adler-MilsteinJ.LinS. C.JhaA. K. (2016). The number of health information exchange efforts is declining, leaving the viability of broad clinical data exchange uncertain. Health Affairs, 35, 1278-1285.
4.
Adler-MilsteinJ.RonchiE.CohenG. R.WinnL. A.JhaA. K. (2014). Benchmarking health IT among OECD countries: Better data for better policy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21, 111-116.
5.
AgarwalR.GaoG.DesRochesC.JhaA. K. (2010). The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Information Systems Research, 21, 796-809.
AndersonG. F.FrognerB. K.JohnsR. A.ReinhardtU. E. (2006). Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries. Health Affairs, 25, 819-831.
8.
ArndtR. Z. (2018). No end in sight: EHRs still cause operational and financial headaches, while benefits are slow to materialize. Modern Healthcare, 48(42), 6-7.
9.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
10.
BauerD. T.AmeringerC. F. (2010). A framework for identifying similarities among countries to improve cross-national comparisons of health systems. Health & Place, 16, 1129-1135.
11.
BeckfieldJ.OlafsdottirS.SosnaudB. (2013). Healthcare systems in comparative perspective: Classification, convergence, institutions, inequalities, and five missed turns. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 127-146.
12.
BergM. (2001). Implementing information systems in health care organizations: Myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64, 143-156.
13.
BlumenthalD.AbramsM. K. (2016). Tailoring complex care management for high-need, high-cost patients. Journal of the American Medical Association, 316, 1657-1658.
14.
BlumenthalD.DixonJ. (2012). Health-care reforms in the USA and England: Areas for useful learning. Lancet, 380, 1352-1357.
15.
BöhmK.SchmidA.GötzeR.LandwehrC.RothgangH. (2013). Five types of OECD healthcare systems: Empirical results of a deductive classification. Health Policy, 113, 258-269.
16.
BurauV.BlankR. H. (2006). Comparing health policy: An assessment of typologies of health systems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 8, 63-76.
17.
BurnhamP.LutzK. G.GrantW.Layton-HenryZ. (2008). Research methods in politics. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
CampionT. R. J.GaddC. S. (2010, November). Peers, regulators, and professions: The influence of organizations in health information technology adoption. Paper presented at the AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, Washington, DC.
CuccinielloM.GuerrazziC.NasiG.OngaroE. (2015). Coordination mechanisms for implementing complex innovations in the health care sector. Public Management Review, 17, 1040-1060.
21.
CurrieG.SuhomlinovaO. (2006). The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: The triumph of professional power and the inconsistency of policy. Public Administration, 84, 1-30.
22.
CurrieW. L. (2012). Institutional isomorphism and change: The national programme for IT–10 years on. Journal of Information Technology, 27, 236-248.
23.
CurrieW. L. (2014). Translating health IT policy into practice in the UK National Health Service. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 26(2), 3-26.
24.
DeutschE.DuftschmidG.DordaW. (2010). Critical areas of national electronic health record programs: Is our focus correct?International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 211-222.
25.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
26.
DixonB. E. (2016). What is health information exchange? In DixonB. E. (Ed.), Health information exchange (pp. 3-20). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
27.
DixonB. E.GrannisS. J.RevereD. (2013). Measuring the impact of a health information exchange intervention on provider-based notifiable disease reporting using mixed methods: A study protocol. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, 121.
28.
DolowitzD. P.MarshD. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13, 5-23.
29.
EsterleL.KouroubaliA.De MooreG.Bruun-RasmussenM.HurlG.CigleneckiL. (2010). Political and organisational factors influencing large scale implementation of electronic health records: Recommendations for a Realistic Implementation Plan. Retrieved from http://www.eurorec.org/files/filesPublic/EHR-I%20%20Recommendations.pdf
30.
FayM.MalleyJ. (2014). HSA growth and the associated opportunities/challenges presented by pharmacy benefits. Benefits Quarterly, 30(3), 8-15.
31.
FerlieE.FitzgeraldL.WoodM.HawkinsC. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 117-134.
32.
FleurenM.WiefferinkK.PaulussenT. (2004). Determinants of innovation within health care organizations. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16, 107-123.
33.
FontaineP.RossS. E.ZinkT.SchillingL. M. (2010). Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. Journal of American Board of Family Medicine, 23, 655-670.
34.
FrankelM.ChinitzD.SalzbergC. A.ReichmanK. (2013). Sustainable health information exchanges: The role of institutional factors. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 2, 21.
35.
FurukawaM. F.PatelV.CharlesD.SwainM.MostashariF. (2013). Hospital electronic health information exchange grew substantially in 2008-12. Health Affairs, 32, 1346-1354.
36.
GeissbuhlerA. (2013). Lessons learned implementing a regional health information exchange in Geneva as a pilot for the Swiss national eHealth strategy. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82, e118-e124.
37.
GrantM. J.BoothA. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91-108.
38.
GrantR. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Suppl. 2), 109-122.
GreenhalghT.PottsH. W.WongG.BarkP.SwinglehurstD. (2009). Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Quarterly, 87, 729-788.
41.
GreenhalghT.RobertG.MacfarlaneF.BaterP.KyriakidouO. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82, 581-629.
42.
HeartT.O’ReillyP.SammonD.O’DonoghueJ. (2009). Bottom-up or top-down? A comparative analysis of electronic health record diffusion in Ireland and Israel. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 11, 244-268.
43.
HoworthC.MuellerF.HarveyC. (2002). The diffusion of an organisational innovation: Adopting “patient-focused care” in an N.H.S. Hospital trust. Competition & Change, 6, 213-232.
44.
KalraD.MusenM.SmithB.CeustersW.De MoorG. (2011). ARGOS policy brief on semantic interoperability. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 170, 1-15.
45.
KierkegaardP. (2011). Electronic health record: Wiring Europe’s healthcare. Computer Law & Security Review, 27, 503-515.
46.
KimberlyJ. R.EvaniskoM. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
47.
KruseC. S.RegierV. (2014). Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States. JMIR Medical Informatics, 2(2), e26.
48.
LaugesenM. J.GliedS. A. (2011). Higher fees paid to US physicians drive higher spending for physician services compared to other countries. Health Affairs, 30, 1647-1656.
49.
LockettA.ThompsonS.MorgensternU. (2009). The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 9-28.
50.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
MorrisonZ.RobertsonA.CresswellK.CroweS.SheikhA. (2011). Understanding contrasting approaches to nationwide implementations of electronic health record systems: England, the USA and Australia. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2(1), 25-42.
53.
MyllärniemiJ.LaihonenH.KarppinenH.SeppänenK. (2012). Knowledge management practices in healthcare services. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(4), 54-65.
OsbornR.MouldsD.SchneiderE. C.DotyM. M.SquiresD.SarnakD. O. (2015). Primary care physicians in ten countries report challenges caring for patients with complex health needs. Health Affairs, 34, 2104-2112.
56.
PeterafM. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.
57.
RozenblumR.JangY.ZimlichmanE.SalzbergC.TamblynM.BuckeridgeD.. . . TamblynR. (2011). A qualitative study of Canada’s experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology. Canadian Medical Association Journal/Journal de l’Association Medicale Canadienne, 183, E281-E288.
58.
RudinR. S.BatesD. W. (2014). Let the left hand know what the right is doing: A vision for care coordination and electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21, 13-16.
59.
SampatB.DrummondM. (2011). Another special relationship? Interactions between health technology policies and health care systems in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36, 119-139.
60.
ScheiberG. J. (1987). Financing and delivering health care: A comparative analysis of OECD countries. Paris, France, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
61.
ScottW. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In SmithK. G.HittM. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 460-485). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
62.
ShankN. (2012). Behavioral health providers’ beliefs about health information exchange: A statewide survey. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 19, 562-569.
63.
ShererS. (2010). Information systems and healthcare: An institutional theory perspective on physician adoption of electronic health records. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27(7), 127-140.
64.
ShererS.MeyerhoeferC. D.PengL. (2016). Applying institutional theory to the adoption of electronic health records in the U.S. Information & Management, 53, 570-580.
65.
SridharS.BrennanP. F.WrightS. J.RobinsonS. M. (2012). Optimizing financial effects of HIE: A multi-party linear programming approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19, 1082-1088.
66.
TeoH.-H.WeiK. K.BenbasatI. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27, 19-49.
67.
TerryN. P.FrancisL. (2007). Ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of electronic health records. Retrieved from file:///E:/SSRN-id886904.pdf
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G. (1999). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In CleggS. R.HardyC. (Eds.), Studying organization: Theory and Method (pp. 169-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
UhlenbruckK.MeyerK. E.HittM. A. (2003). Organizational transformation in transition economies: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 257-282.
71.
VestJ. R. (2010). More than just a question of technology: Factors related to hospitals’ adoption and implementation of health information exchange. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 797-806.
72.
VestJ. R. (2012). Health information exchange: National and international approaches. Advances in Health Care Management, 12, 3-24.
73.
VestJ. R.GammL. D. (2010). Health information exchange: Persistent challenges and new strategies. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 17, 288-294.
74.
VestJ. R.ZhaoH.JaspersonJ.GammL. D.OhsfeldtR. L. (2011). Factors motivating and affecting health information exchange usage. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 18, 143-149.
75.
WejnertB. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297-326.
76.
WendtC.FrisinaL.RothgangH. (2009). Healthcare system types: A conceptual framework for comparison. Social Policy & Administration, 43, 70-90.
77.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
78.
YasnoffW. A.HumphreysB. L.OverhageJ. M.DetmerD. E.BrennanP. F.MorrisR. W.. . . FanningJ. P. (2004). A consensus action agenda for achieving the National Health Information Infrastructure. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11, 332-338.
79.
YeagerV. A.WalkerD.ColeE.MoraA. M.DianaM. L. (2014). Factors related to health information exchange participation and use. Journal of Medical Systems, 38(8), 78.
80.
ZwaanswijkM.VerheijR. A.WiesmanF. J.FrieleR. D. (2011). Benefits and problems of electronic information exchange as perceived by health care professionals: An interview study. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 256.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
