The uninsured fare worse than the insured on various measures, yet there is little evidence regarding trends in care for the uninsured and disparities by insurance status. Given changes in the health care system and the safety net, disparities between insured and uninsured populations may be changing over time. This article considers trends in access, chronic disease control, and heart attack care by insurance status and the disparity in these measures between uninsured and insured nonelderly adults, controlling for demographic characteristics to account for potential changes in the composition of these populations. Rates for the uninsured for all outcomes have generally been stable from the mid-1990s to mid-2000s, with fluctuation in some measures over shorter periods. In addition, there is a persistent disparity between the privately insured and uninsured on access measures. The gap between the uninsured and insured has not narrowed, though disparities generally have not worsened either.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2009). National healthcare disparities report, 2009. Rockville, MD: Author.
2.
AiC.NortonE. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80, 123-129.
3.
AyanianJ. Z.WeissmanJ. S.SchneiderE. C.GinsburgJ. A.ZaslavskyA. M. (2000). Unmet health needs of uninsured adults in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 2061-2069.
4.
BerkM. L.SchurC. L.CantorJ. C. (1995). Ability to obtain health care: Recent estimates from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation national access to care survey. Health Affairs, 14(3), 139-146.
5.
BundorfK. M.SchulmanK. A.StaffordJ. A.GaskinD.JollisJ. G.EscarceJ. J. (2004). Impact of managed care on the treatment, costs, and outcomes of fee-for-service Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. Health Services Research, 39(1), 131-152.
6.
CantoJ. G.RogersW. J.FrenchW. J.GoreJ. M.ChandraN. C.BarronH. V., for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. (2000). Payer status and the utilization of hospital resources in acute myocardial infarction: A report from the national registry of myocardial infarction 2. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 817-823.
7.
Center for Studying Health System Change. (2005). Community Tracking Study 2003 Household Survey public use file: User’s guide. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
CunninghamP. J.KemperP. (1998). Ability to obtain medical care for the uninsured: How much does it vary across communities?Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 921-927.
9.
CutlerD. M.McClellanM. (2001). Is technological change in medicine worth it?Health Affairs, 20(5), 11-29.
10.
DeNavas-WaltC.ProctorB. D.SmithJ. C. (2010, September). Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2009 (Current Population Reports, P60-238). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
11.
EfronB.TibshiraniR. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap (Vol. 57). New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
12.
GliedS.LittleS. E. (2003). The uninsured and the benefits of medical progress. Health Affairs, 22(4), 210-219.
13.
HadleyJ.CravensM.CoughlinT.HolahanJ. (2005). Federal spending on the health care safety net from 2001-2004: Has spending kept pace with the growth in the uninsured?Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation.
14.
HerringB. (2005). The effect of the availability of charity care to the uninsured on the demand for private health insurance. Journal of Health Economics, 24, 225-252.
15.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Coverage matters: Insurance and health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
16.
Institute of Medicine. (2002). Care without coverage: Too little, too late. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
17.
Institute of Medicine. (2009). America’s uninsured crisis: Consequences for health and health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
18.
KornE.GraubardB. (1999). Predictive margins (direct standardization). In KornE.GraubardB. (Eds.), Analysis of health surveys (pp. 126-140). New York, NY: Wiley.
19.
Lê CookB.McGuireT. G.ZuvekasS. H. (2009). Measuring trends in racial/ethnic health care disparities. Medical Care Research and Review, 66, 23-48.
20.
McWilliamsJ. M.MearaE.ZaslavskyA. M.AyanianJ. Z. (2009). Differences in control of cardiovascular disease and diabetes by race, ethnicity, and education: U.S. trends from 1999 to 2006 and effects of Medicare coverage. Annals of Internal Medicine, 150, 505-515.
21.
MooneyC. Z.DuvalR. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
National Center for Health Statistics. (2003). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data: Physician examination procedures manual. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
23.
National Center for Health Statistics. (2006). Analytic and reporting guidelines: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
24.
SchoenC.DesRochesC. (2000). Uninsured and unstably insured: The importance of continuous insurance coverage. Health Services Research, 35(1, Pt. 2), 187-206.
25.
StrouseR.CarlsonB.HallJ.CybulskiK. (2009). Community Tracking Study: Household Survey Methodology Report 2007 (Round five). Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change.
26.
ThorpeK. E.HowardD. (2003). Health insurance and spending among cancer patients. Health Affairs, Web Exclusive, w3-198-198. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.18910.1377/hlthaff.w3.189
27.
WilperA. P.WoolhandlerS.LasserK. E.McCormickD.BorD. H.HimmelsteinD. U. (2008). A national study of chronic disease prevalence and access to care in uninsured U.S. Adults. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 170-176.
