A challenge in the adoption of long-term care (LTC) policy reform is the number of constituency groups active in LTC and historical antagonism among these groups regarding critical issues such as LTC financing and regulation. As part of a national survey of LTC specialists, the authors asked previously identified specialists to nominate other “experts” with known or demonstrable experience in LTC. As a proxy for potential information exchange, data about nominations were used to construct and describe the networks of LTC specialists representing consumer advocates, provider representatives, public officials, policy experts, and others. Associations between network characteristics and attitudes about LTC policy reform were also examined. Individuals tended to nominate other people within their same constituency group as experts. Academic and research-based policy experts were most likely to be classified as prominent network members. Network structure was associated with attitudes toward LTC financing but not the regulation of nursing homes.
Aarp. (2009). Providing more long-term support and services at home: Why it’s critical for health reform. Retrieved from http://www.aarp.org/research/ppi/ltc/hcbs/articles/fs_hcbs_hcr.html
2.
Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. ( 1997). Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8, 289-309.
3.
Adamic, L., Lukose, R., Puniyani, A., & Huberman, B. ( 2001). Search in power-law networks. Physical Review E, 64, 046135.
4.
Agada, J. ( 1999). Inner-city gatekeepers: An exploratory survey of their information use environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 74-85.
5.
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabasi, A.L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406, 378-382.
6.
Alexander, C.N. ( 1963). A method for processing sociometric data. Sociometry, 4, 268-269.
7.
Barzilai-Nahon, K. ( 2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1493-1512.
8.
Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P.F., & McPhee, W.N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Bivand, R. ( 2009). Spatial dependence: Weighting schemes, statistics and models (R package 0.4-36). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spdep/index.html
10.
Blau, J. ( 1974). Patterns of communication among theoretical high energy physicists. Sociometry, 37, 391-406.
11.
Borgatti, S.P., & Cross, R. ( 2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 432-445.
12.
Burke, S.P., Feder, J., & Van de Water, P.N. (2005). Developing a better long-term care policy: A vision and strategy for America’s future. Washington, DC: National Academic of Social Insurance .
13.
Burt, R.S. ( 1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37-54.
14.
Butts, C.T., Handcock, M.S., & Hunter, D.R. ( 2008). Network: Classes for relational data (R package version 1.4-1). Irvine, CA. Retrieved from http://statnet.org
15.
Christakis, N.A., & Fowler, J.H. ( 2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370-379.
16.
Freeman, L.C. ( 1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness . Sociometry, 40, 35-41.
17.
Galaskiewicz, J. ( 1985). Professional networks and the institutionalization of a single mind set. American Sociological Review, 50, 639-658.
18.
Granovetter, M.S. ( 1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
19.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Science Research, 18, 323-342.
20.
Heclo, H. ( 1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87-124). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
21.
Katz, E. ( 1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, 67-78.
22.
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. ( 1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan, & Pearce.
23.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. ( 2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
24.
Milgram, S. ( 1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today , 1, 60-67.
25.
Miller, E.A., Booth, M., & Mor, V. ( 2008). Assessing experts’ views on the future of long-term care. Research on Aging, 30, 450-473.
26.
Miller, E.A., & Mor, V. ( 2006). Out of the shadows: Envisioning a brighter future for long-term care in America. Providence, RI: Brown University.
27.
Miller, E.A., Mor, V., & Clark, M. ( 2010). Reforming long-term care in the United States: Findings from a national survey of specialists. The Gerontologist, 50, 238-252.
28.
Miller, E.A., & Weissert, W.G. (2010). The Commonwealth Survey of Long-Term Care Specialists. Medical Care Research and Review , 67S: 3S-15S.
29.
National Commission for Quality Long-Term Care. ( 2007). Voters speak out on long-term care. Retrieved from http://www.qualitylongtermcarecommission.org/pdf/final_survey_report_20071203.pdf
30.
O’Malley, A.J., & Marsden, P.V. ( 2008). The analysis of social networks. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 8, 222-269.
31.
Panzarasa, P., Opsahl, T., & Carley, K.M. ( 2009). Patterns and dynamics of users’ behavior and interaction: Network analysis of an online community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 911-932.
32.
Reingen, P.H., & Kernan, J.B. ( 1986). Analysis of referral networks in marketing: Methods and illustration. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 370-378.
33.
Roch, C.H. ( 2005). The dual roots of opinion leadership. Journal of Politics, 67, 110-131.
34.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
35.
Sabidussi, G. ( 1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika , 31, 581-603.
36.
Stevenson, D.G. ( 2008). Planning for the future-Long-term care and the 2008 election . New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 1985-1987.
37.
Strang, D., & Soule, S.A. ( 1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265-290.
38.
Sudman, S., Bradburn, N., & Schwartz, N. ( 1995). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Valente, T.W., & Davis, R.L. ( 1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 55-67.
40.
Valente, T.W., & Rogers, E.M. ( 1995). The origins and development of the diffusion of innovations paradigm as an example of scientific growth. Science Communication , 16, 242-273.
41.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. ( 1994). Social network analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Weinmann, G. ( 1982). On the importance of marginality: One more step into the two-step flow of communication. American Sociological Review, 47, 764-773.
43.
Weimann, G. ( 1983). The strength of weak conversational ties in the flow of information and influence. Social Networks, 5, 245-267.
44.
Weimann, G. ( 1991). The influentials: Back to the concept of opinion leaders ? Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 267-279.
45.
Weissert, W. ( 2008). Long-term care politics and policy. In C. M. Mara & L. K. Olson (Eds.), Handbook of long-term care administration and policy (pp. 319-338). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
46.
West, E., Barron, D.N., Dowsett, J., & Newton, J.N. ( 1999). Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of health care professionals: Implications for the design of dissemination strategies . Social Science & Medicine, 48, 633-646.
47.
Wiener, J.M., Estes, C.L., Goldenson, S.M., & Goldberg, S.C. (2001). What happened to long-term care in the health reform debate of 1993-1994? Lessons for the future. Milbank Quarterly, 79, 207-252.
