Every 5 years, the federal government reviews the Medicare Fee Schedule for changes in the work effort physicians personally devote to office visits. Using physician face-to-face times reported in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Ambulatory Care Survey (NAMCS), guideline office visit times associated with the 1997-1998 mix of Medicare claims averaged 9 percent longer versus NAMCS; Medicare billed visits with new patients were 32 percent longer. Surgeons and dermatologists had the largest discrepancies in Medicare versus NAMCS times. If CPT guideline times currently in use are now overstated, then intraservice work effort is likely overstated given the high correlation of time with work effort, and Medicare payment levels need to be reduced. Upcoding visit content to higher paid CPT visit codes may also explain seemingly longer Medicare billed times and call for payment reductions as well.
American Medical Association. 1992. CPT 1992: Physicians’ current procedural methodology. Chicago: American Medical Association.
2.
American Medical Association. 1997. Socioeconomic characteristics of medical practice. AMA/CHPR SES Survey, Tables 1 and 5. Chicago: American Medical Association.
3.
American Medical Association. 2002. E&M documentation guidelines update, 4/24/2002. http://www.ama.assn.org/emupdate.
4.
Andrich, D.1988. Rasch model for measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Balkrishnan, R., M. A. Hall, D. Mehrabi, G. J. Chen, S. R. Feldman, and A. B. Fleischer. 2002. Capitation payment, length of visit, and preventive services: Evidence from a national sample of outpatient physicians. American Journal of Management Care8 (4): 332-340.
6.
Blumenthal, D., N. Causino, Y. C. Chang, L. Culpepper, W. Marder, D. Saglam, R. Stafford, and B. Starfield. 1999. The duration of ambulatory visits to physicians. Journal of Family Practice48 (4): 264-271.
7.
Braun, P., J. Dernburg, D. L. Dunn, and W. Cohen. 1992. Predicting the work of evaluation and management services. Medical Care30 (Suppl.): NS13-NS27.
8.
Braun, P., and D. L. Dunn. 1999. To the editor. New England Journal of Medicine341:1619-1620.
9.
Brett, A. S.1998. New guidelines for coding physicians’ services—A step backward. New England Journal of Medicine339:1705-1708.
10.
Burt, C. W.2002. National trends in use of medications in office-based practice, 1985-1999. Health Affairs21 (4): 206-214.
11.
Burt,C.W.,and S. M. Schappert. 2004. Ambulatorycare visits to physicians offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1999-2000. Vital Health Statistics, September (157): 1-70.
12.
Bystryn, J. C.1999. Reimbursement for evaluation and management services. New England Journal of Medicine341:1619-1619.
13.
Chao, J., W. G. Gillanders, S. A. Flocke, M. A. Goodwin, G. E. Kikano, and K. C. Strange. 1998. Billing for physician services: A comparison of actual billing with CPT codes assigned by direct observation. Journal of Family Practice47 (1): 28-32.
14.
Connolly, C.2005. Medicare monthly premium rising to $89.20 in 2006. Washington Post, April 1.
15.
Cromwell, J., J. B. Mitchell, and W. B. Stason. 1990. Learning by doing in CABG surgery. Medical Care28 (1): 6-18.
16.
Florin, R. 1998. A study of RVUs for a series of laminectomy codes using a technique called paired comparisons. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
Health Care Financing Administration. 1997. Documentation guidelines for evaluation and management services. Baltimore, MD: Health Care Financing Administration.
18.
Iezzoni, L. I.1999. The demand for documentation for Medicare payment. New England Journal of Medicine341:365-367.
19.
Kassirer, J. P., and M. Angell. 1998. Evaluation and management guidelines—Fatally flawed. New England Journal of Medicine339:1697-1698.
20.
Kelwala, S.1999. To the editor. New England Journal of Medicine341:1620-1621.
21.
Kikano, G. E., M. A. Goodwin, and K. C. Strange. 2001. Evaluation and management services: A comparison of medical record documentation with actual billing in a community practice. Archives of Family Medicine9:68-71.
22.
King, M. S., L. Sharp, and M. S. Lipsky. 2001. Accuracy of CPT evaluation and management coding by family physicians. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice14 (3): 184-192.
23.
Lasker, R. D., and M. S. Marquis. 1999. The intensity of physicians’ work in patient visits. New England Journal of Medicine341:337-341.
24.
Marciniak, T. A., and C. H. Om. 2001. Medicare physician payment for practice expense: Is it refined? Part I office visit reevaluations. Medical General Medicine3 (1): E10-E10.
25.
McCall, N. T., J. Cromwell, E. Drozd, S. Hoover, and P. Braun. 2001. Validation of physician time data: Final report. HCFA Contract no. 500-95-0058, T.O. 7, DHHS/HCFA, December 12.
26.
Mechanic, D., D. McAlpine, and M. Rosenthal. 2001. Are patients’ office visits with physicians getting shorter?New England Journal of Medicine344 (3): 198-204.
27.
Mitchell, J. B., R. Schurman, and J. Cromwell. 1988. The changing nature of physicians’ office visits. Health Services Research23 (4): 575-591.
28.
National Center for Health Statistics Public-Use Data Files and Documentation. 1998. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/datawh/ftpsexv/ftpdata/ftpdata.htm.
29.
O’Neill, L., and J. Kuder. 2005. Explaining variation in physician practice patterns and their propensities to recommend services. Medical Care Research and Review62 (3): 339-357.
30.
Pothoff, R. F., M. A. Woodbury, and K. G. Manton. 1992. Equivalent sample size and equivalent degrees of freedom refinement for inference using survey weights under superpopulation models. Journal of the American Statistical Association87:388-396.
31.
Proudfoot, M. L.1993. A critique of the practice-expense values of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. Journal of Family Practice37 (1): 57-67.
32.
Roethlisberger, F. J., and W. J. Dickson. 1939. Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Types of payment errors in FY98 found by OIG audit of Medicare claims. 2000. Part B News14 (March): 7-7.
34.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2001. Medicare program. Revisions to payment policies and five year review of and adjustment to the relative value units under the Physician Fee Schedule for calendar year 2002; final rule. Federal Register66 (212): 555246-503.
35.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2005. Notice of Medicare program: 2005. Five-year review of work relative value units underthe Medicare Fee Schedule. Federal Register61 (87): 19992-20048.
36.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Health Care Financing Administration. 1998. Proposed rules. Federal Register63 (108): 30888-93080.
37.
Woodwell, D. A.1999. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1997 summary.Advance Data No. 305. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
38.
Woodwell, D., and D. K. Cherry. 2004. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 summary. Advance data from Vital and Health Statistics. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
