Preferred provider organizations (PPOs) represent a diverse and complex set of arrangements among insurance entities, networks of physicians, network organizers, and purchasers. Opinions differ regarding the degree to which PPOs have responsibility to manage care and to measure and report key aspects of their performance to customers and the public. Technical and operational challenges to performance measurement currently limit public reporting, even when agreement exists that it is appropriate for PPOs to do so. The Health Plan and Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) is a health maintenance organization performance measure that could provide standards for PPO reporting. This article explores conceptual and methodological considerations regarding HEDIS and other performance measurement in PPOs and identifies failures of the current marketplace. While using some measures may be premature or inappropriate, there are significant opportunities to apply other measures now and, by doing so, to create a functional health care marketplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berwick, D. M.1989. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. New England Journal of Medicine320 (1): 53-56.
2.
Bilheimer, L. T., and D. C. Colby. 2001. Expanding coverage: Reflections on recent efforts. Health Affairs20 (1): 83-95.
3.
Clinton, W. J.1997. Remarks on the Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry. In Public Papers of the Presidents. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
4.
Darby, C.2001. Commentary. Medical Care Research and Review58 (suppl. 1): 67-69.
5.
Epstein, A.1995. Performance reports on quality—Prototypes, problems, and prospects. New England Journal of Medicine333:57-61.
6.
Epstein, A., and P. Cleary. 2000. Impact of sociodemographic case mix on the HEDIS measures of health plan quality. Medical Care38 (10): 981-992.
7.
Feldman, D., and D. Novak. 1998. Effects of managed care on physician-patient relationships. Quality of care, and the ethical practice of medicine. Archives of Internal Medicine158:1626-1632.
8.
Feldstein, P. J., and T. M. Wickizer. 1995. Analysis of private health insurance premium growth rates 1985-1992. Medical Care33 (10): 1035-1050.
9.
Felt-Lisk, S., and L. C. Kleinman. 2000. Study of effective practices in managed care: Ten case studies. Field report, The Commonwealth Fund, New York.
10.
Fowles, J.1997. Report cards and risk adjustment to the president’s Commission on Consumer Protection and Health Care Quality. Sub-Committee on Quality Measurement, Chicago.
11.
Franks P., C. M. Clancy, and M. R. Gold. 1993. Health insurance and mortality evidence from a national cohort. Journal of the American Medical Association270:737-741.
12.
Gemson, D. H., A. Ashford, L. L. Dickey, S. H. Raymore, J. W. Roberts, M. H. Ehrlich, B. G. Foster, M. L. Ganz, J. Moon-Howard, and L. S. Field. 1995. Putting prevention into practice: Impact of a multi-faceted physician education program on preventable services in the inner city. Archives of Internal Medicine155:2210-2216.
13.
Greenberg, L.2000. Perspectives on PPO performance measurement from consumers, PPO leaders, and employers. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.
14.
Halverson, P. K., A. D. Kaluzny, and C. P. McLaughlin. 1998. Managed care and public health. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
15.
Health Insurance Association of America. 2000. Source book of health insurance data, 1989-2000. Washington, DC: Health Insurance Association of America.
16.
Marquis, M. S., and S. Long. 2001. Prevalence of selected employer health insurance purchasing strategies in 1997. Health Affairs20 (4): 220-230.
17.
McCall N., G. Pope, M. Griggs, K. Adamache, D. Dayhoff, C. Caswell, and K. Smith. 2000. Research and analytic support for implementing performance measurement in Medicare fee for service: Second annual report. Baltimore: Health Care Finance Administration.
18.
Millenson, M. L.1999. Demanding medical excellence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Mitka, M.1998. A quarter century of health maintenance. Journal of the American Medical Association280:2059-2060.
20.
Moran, D. W.1997. Federal regulations of managed care: An impulse in search of a theory. Health Affairs16 (6): 7-21.
21.
National Committee for Quality Assurance. 2001. HEDIS 2001 technical specifications. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance.
22.
Partnership for Prevention. 1999. Why invest in disease prevention? Results from the Partnership for Prevention. Washington, DC: Partnership for Prevention.
23.
Roper, W. L., and C. M. Cutler. 1998. Health plan accountability and reporting: Issues and challenges. Health Affairs17 (2): 152-155.
24.
Schauffler, H. H., S. McMenamin, J. Cubanski, and H. S. Hanley. 2001. Differences in the kinds of problems consumers report in staff/group health maintenance organizations, independent practice association/network health maintenance organizations, and preferred provider organizations in California. Medical Care39 (1): 15-25.
25.
Showstack, J., N. Lurie, S. Leatherman, E. Fisher, and T. Inui. 1996. Health of the public: The private-sector challenge. Journal of the American Medical Association276 (24): 1951.
26.
Smith, D. 1994. The cost of management activities of PPOs: The information content of accounting-based reports vs. statistical analyses of PPO cost savings. Paper presented at the American Risk and Insurance Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August.
27.
Spranca, M., D. E. Kanouse, M. Elliott, P. F. Short, D. O. Farley, and R. D. Hays. 2000. Do consumer reports of health plan quality affect health plan selection? Part 1. Health Services Research35 (5): 933-947.
28.
William M. Mercer. 1999. William Mercer survey of employers-sponsored health plans. Washington, DC: William M. Mercer.
29.
Zoloth-Dorfman, L.1995. The patient as commodity: Managed care and the question of ethics. Journal of Clinical Ethics6:339-357.
