This paper investigates the effect of using a tuned mass damper (TMD) on the wind-induced nonlinear response of cable stayed bridges. It is shown how to determine the optimal mass of the passive tuned mass damper to obtain the highest damping in the bridge.
Abdel-Rohman, M., 1984a, "Optimal design of active TMD for building control," Building and Environment19(3), 191-195.
2.
Abdel-Rohman, M., 1984b, "Effectiveness of active TMD for buildings control," Transactions of Canadian Society of Mechanical Engineers8(4), 179-184.
3.
Abdel-Rohman, M. and Leipholz, H., 1983, "Active control of tall buildings," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE109(3), 628-645.
4.
Derby, T.F. and Calcaterra, P.C. , 1971, "Control of single-span highway bridge vibrations," Highway Research Record, Highway Research Board, No. 354, 27-44.
5.
Harvat, D., Barak, P., and Rabins, M., 1983, "Semi-active versus passive or active tuned mass dampers for structural control," Journal of Engineering Mechanics , ASCE109(3), 691-705.
6.
Hirofumi, K., 1988, "Effect of tuned mass dampers on the dynamic response of RAMA IX cable-stayed bridge under earthquake actions," Master's thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.
7.
Leipholz, H.H. and Abdel-Rohman, M. , 1986, Control of Structures, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, MA.
8.
Malhotra, P.K., 1987, "Tuned mass damper for suppressing wind effects in cable-stayed bridge decks," Master's thesis, Asian Institute of Technology , Bangkok, Thailand.
9.
Meirovitch, L. and Ghosh, D., 1987, "Control of flutters in bridges," Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE113, 720-736.
10.
Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R.H., 1986, Wind Effects on Structures, John Wiley , New York.
