Multi-objective optimization of direct-drive neutral equilibrium mechanism for disaster relief bridges using NSGA-II

Abstract

Emergency relief bridges are critical lifelines in post-disaster scenarios but often suffer from excessive vibration and deformation due to their lightweight design. Conventional active control systems require high energy input. Passive systems lack adaptability. To address these challenges, this study proposes a novel Direct-Drive Neutral Equilibrium Mechanism (DNEM), which leverages geometric nonlinearity to create a “virtual pier” effect, achieving high stiffness with minimal energy consumption. Recognizing the conflicting objectives of minimizing structural displacement and reducing actuation energy, the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) was employed to optimize the geometric and control parameters of the mechanism. A numerical simulation platform representing a scaled emergency bridge was established to validate the system’s performance under moving loads. The results demonstrate that the optimized DNEM system operates under a “Zero Power Force Control” (ZPFC) regime, where most of the supporting force is generated through the redistribution of geometric potential energy. Under a 150 N dynamic load—equivalent to approximately 1.5 tons on a prototype bridge with a geometric scaling factor of $λ = 10$ —the system limits the mid-span displacement to 1.77 mm while consuming only 0.59 kJ of energy. Furthermore, phase-plane analysis confirmed the system’s asymptotic stability and ability to eliminate residual vibrations rapidly without overshoot. This study confirms that the AI-optimized DNEM provides a robust, energy-efficient solution for the micro-deformation control of temporary civil structures.

Keywords

direct-drive neutral equilibrium mechanism (DNEM)non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II)zero power force control (ZPFC)disaster relief bridge structural vibration control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balling

Briggs

Gillman

(2006) Multiple optimum size/shape/topology designs for skeletal structures using a genetic algorithm. Journal of Structural Engineering 132(7): 1158–1165, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:7(1158)

Carrella

Brennan

Waters

(2007) Static analysis of a passive vibration isolator with quasi-zero-stiffness characteristic. Journal of Sound and Vibration 301(3–5): 678–689, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.10.011

Coello

(2000) An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization. ACM Computing Surveys 32(2): 109–143, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/358923.358935

Datta

(2003) A state-of-the-art review on active control of structures. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 40(1): 1–17, Available at: https://doi.org/10.63898/ALPX4492

Deb

Pratap

Agarwal

, et al. (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2): 182–197, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

Dyke

Spencer

Sain

, et al. (1996) Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Smart Materials and Structures 5(5): 565–575, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006

Fisher

Roy

(2011) Fatigue of steel bridge infrastructure. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 7(7–8): 457–475, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.493304

Heinen

Elias

Dorgelo

, et al. (2025) Assessing the impact of deterioration on steel bridges with tuned mass dampers. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 1–15, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2025.2573881

Ibrahim

(2008) Recent advances in nonlinear passive vibration isolators. Journal of Sound and Vibration 314(3–5): 371–452, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.01.014

10.

Kaveh

(2017) Applications of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Civil Engineering. Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48012-1

11.

Ahn

(2011) A vibration isolation system in low frequency excitation region using negative stiffness structure for vehicle seat. Journal of Sound and Vibration 330(26): 6311–6335, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.07.039

12.

Liao

W-I

Loh

C-H

Chai

(2002) The current development of seismic design code of highway bridges in Taiwan. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2002 pressure vessels and piping conference, Vancouver, Canada, 5–9 August 2002. ASME, Vol. 445, pp. 1–8. Available at. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2002-1415

13.

Lin

C-C

L-Y

Lin

G-L

, et al. (2010) Vibration control of seismic structures using semi-active friction multiple tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures 32(10): 3404–3417, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.014

14.

Liu

Huang

Hua

(2013) On the characteristics of a quasi-zero stiffness isolator using Euler buckled beam as negative stiffness corrector. Journal of Sound and Vibration 332(14): 3359–3376, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.10.037

15.

Marler

Arora

(2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 26: 369–395, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6

16.

Platus

(1992) Negative-stiffness-mechanism vibration isolation systems. In: Vibration Control in Microelectronics, Optics, and Metrology (SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1619). SPIE, pp. 44–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.56823

17.

Salvi

Rizzi

Rustighi

, et al. (2018) Optimum tuning of passive tuned mass dampers for the mitigation of pulse-like responses. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 140(6): 061014, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040475

18.

Sánchez-Haro

Lombillo

Capellán

(2023) Modelling criteria proposal for dynamic analysis of beam bridges under moving loads using FEM models. Structures 50: 651–669, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.067

19.

Shih

M-H

Sung

W-P

Wang

Y-C

(2018) Developing a neutral equilibrium device as dynamic virtual piers for an emergency relief bridge. Journal of Measurements in Engineering 6(4): 289–296, Available at: https://doi.org/10.21595/jme.2018.20318

20.

Soong

Spencer

(2002) Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures 24(3): 243–259, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X

21.

Sung

W-P

Shih

M-H

(2025) Machine learning evaluation of PI control effects on neutral equilibrium in bridge virtual pier systems. Scientific Reports 15(1): 36630, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20482-z

22.

Symans

Constantinou

(1999) Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures 21(6): 469–487, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00225-3

23.

Zhou

, et al. (2013) Theoretical and experimental analyses of a nonlinear magnetic vibration isolator with quasi-zero-stiffness characteristic. Journal of Sound and Vibration 332(14): 3377–3389, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.01.034

24.

Zakian

Bakhshpoori

(2024) Optimal design of multiple tuned mass dampers for controlling the earthquake response of randomly excited structures. Acta Mechanica 235: 511–532, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03749-2

25.

Zhou

Liu

(2010) A tunable high-static–low-dynamic stiffness vibration isolator. Journal of Sound and Vibration 329(9): 1254–1273, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.11.001

26.

Zohourian

Pamidimukkala

Kermanshachi

, et al. (2025) Modular construction: a comprehensive review. Buildings 15(12): 2020, Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122020