Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This work investigates the performance of a novel hybrid piezo-electromagnetic energy harvester integrated with curved T-shaped and straight beams for efficient broadband vibration energy harvesting (VEH). The proposed system leverages the synergy between piezoelectric and electromagnetic transduction mechanisms while utilizing the unique dynamic properties of curved beams and magnetic nonlinearity to enhance energy harvesting efficiency across a wide frequency range. The developed hybrid harvester consists of two curved T-shaped beams with three piezoelectric patches and two straight cantilevers with one patch on each, with a magnet as a variable tip mass. Simulations were conducted to analyze stress distribution, modal behavior, and harmonic response under various vibrational conditions for T-shaped and curved T-shaped beams. The prototype was tested using a shaker and DAQ device for four different configurations of tip magnets with increasing mass and electromagnetic field density. The average voltage of 27.81 V for piezoelectric with average output power of 0.773 mW as well as energy density of 0.0101 Wm⁻³, and 0.014 V with average power output of 0.736 nW from electromagnetic energy harvester at 1 MΩ external load for the tip mass configuration M4 within the frequency range of 1–150 Hz was achieved. In contrast, the overall average voltage generated at M1, M2, and M3 configurations is 5.38, 9.78, and 15.25 V, respectively. The frequency average voltage (FAV) was calculated for all configurations of M1, M2, M3, and M4 as 6.19, 8.25, 9.94, and 11.37 V/Hz. The findings reveal that the hybrid piezo-electromagnetic energy harvester can effectively harvest energy from broadband vibrational sources, making it a promising solution for powering wireless sensors, wearable electronics, and other low-power devices in applications such as structural health monitoring, industrial automation, and smart infrastructure.

Keywords

hybrid piezoelectric electromagnetic broadband vibration energy harvester

Introduction

The growing demand for self-powered devices in applications such as structural health monitoring, biomedical devices, and the Internet of Things (IoT) has driven extensive research into vibration energy harvesting (VEH) technologies (Jiang et al., 2024a). Traditional power solutions, such as batteries, are often impractical due to their limited lifespan, environmental concerns, and the need for frequent replacement or recharging (Liang et al., 2021). The best substitute for batteries is conventional VEHs, which often employ piezoelectric (Sharma et al., 2022), triboelectric (Thainiramit et al., 2020), electromagnetic (Ordoñez et al., 2021), and electrostatic (Yamane et al., 2022) transduction mechanisms. However, these designs face challenges in achieving high energy density and broadband operation due to their reliance on single transduction mechanisms and narrow resonant frequencies (Jiang et al., 2023, 2024c). Piezoelectric energy harvesters (PEHs) are widely studied for their high-power density and ease of integration into small-scale systems. However, their performance is often limited by narrow operational bandwidths and sensitivity to frequency variations in ambient vibrations (Yang et al., 2018). Triboelectrics have been extensively explored for their simple fabrication, high-output voltage, and adaptability to various materials and structures. Despite these advantages, their performance is often constrained by surface wear, low durability, stability issues, and degradation over time, particularly under long-term operation in dynamic environments. Furthermore, electromagnetics is widely investigated for its robustness and scalability in energy conversion applications. They efficiently generate power by inducing a current through a moving magnet-coil assembly.

However, their performance is typically limited by low energy density and narrow frequency responses, restricting their efficiency in harvesting ambient vibrations with varying frequencies (Luo et al., 2021). Various advanced techniques and innovative strategies have been proposed to address these limitations, such as frequency up-conversion (Halim et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2022; Zhang and Qin, 2019), multimodal arrays (Li et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020), broadband (Ma et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2023), nonlinear effects (Huang, 2024; Pertin et al., 2022; Shim et al., 2022), dynamic amplification (Qian et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2019), and hybrid energy harvesters (He et al., 2024; Hou et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2022). Additionally, adaptive adjustment techniques, including centrifugal spring mechanisms (Liao et al., 2025; Mei et al., 2023) and variable stiffness mechanisms (Chen et al., 2023; Guo et al., 2022), have shown great potential in tuning the dynamic response of harvesters to match a wider range of excitation frequencies. Among these approaches, tunable bistable energy harvesters (Huang and Yang, 2021), leveraging magnetic nonlinearity, stand out as highly promising systems, offering advantages such as contactless restoring forces, convenient parameter tuning, and outstanding broadband performance (Jiang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2023a; Liu et al., 2023). Moreover, the integration of hybrid piezoelectric-electromagnetic vibration energy harvesting technology with magnetic nonlinearity has gained significant attention due to its potential to enhance energy conversion efficiency and broaden operational frequency ranges (Pertin and Guha, 2022; Zhang et al., 2024). By combining both piezoelectric and electromagnetic transduction mechanisms, this approach captures energy more effectively from complex and varying vibration scenarios (Farhan et al., 2024). The inclusion of magnetic nonlinearity introduces bistable or multi-stable dynamic characteristics, enabling the system to respond to low-frequency and high-amplitude vibrations while maintaining stability across wide frequency ranges in vortex-induced vibration (VIV) energy harvester (Huang and Zhong, 2023; Naseer and Abdelkefi, 2022). By integrating magnetostrictive and piezoelectric phases, magnetoelectric composites achieve strain-mediated coupling between magnetic and electric domains, significantly improving transduction efficiency. This synergy improves energy harvesting performance and provides greater flexibility in system design for real-world applications (Huang et al., 2024).

The proposed hybrid piezoelectric-electromagnetic vibration energy harvester (VEH) combines with magnetic nonlinearity to enhance energy harvesting efficiency and operational bandwidth. The structural design features curved T-shaped and straight beam systems integrated with piezoelectric patches and electromagnetic components, such as magnets and coils, to simultaneously capture mechanical vibrations. The inherent nonlinearity introduced by magnetic interactions induces multi-stable states, which allow the system to exhibit broadband response characteristics even under varying and low-frequency vibrations. This unique combination of elements synergistically optimizes energy conversion and adaptability to diverse operational conditions. The novelty of this study lies in integrating both curved T-shaped and straight beams within a single hybrid piezo-electromagnetic energy harvesting system. This configuration offers several advantages over traditional hybrid harvesters, as it enables broadband energy harvesting by combining beams with distinct natural frequencies, and it enhances output power through improved mode coupling and dynamic interactions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to experimentally and numerically evaluate such a combined beam configuration within a hybrid VEH framework.

This article is organized into six sections, offering a thorough investigation of vibration energy harvesting techniques. The section outlines the Design and Working principle of the proposed energy harvester. The section Finite Element Analysis (FEA) focused on numerical analysis of the two proposed designs. The section Experimental analysis details the experimental setup, while section Results and discussion presents the research outcomes. The last section, summarizes the key conclusions of this research.

Design and working principle

Geometry and configuration

The proposed vibration energy harvester (VEH) employs a novel hybrid design that integrates piezoelectric and electromagnetic energy conversion mechanisms in two different configurations, as shown in Figures 1(a) and (b) of the energy harvester with and without magnetic nonlinearity. The energy harvester consists of two curved T-shaped and two straight cantilever beams designed to optimize energy harvesting efficiency from low as well as higher-frequency vibrations. The curved beam follows an arc-like profile, allowing it to undergo larger displacements to capture energy from low to medium-frequency vibrations. In contrast, straight beams favor energy harvesting from higher-frequency vibrations. The beams are designed with variable tip masses in the form of magnets, which also interact with stationary coils for electromagnetic induction (Dong et al., 2019; Ordoñez et al., 2021). The materials were selected for the development of this hybrid energy harvester, knowing that the materials play a pivotal role in determining the efficiency, durability, and energy conversion capability of vibration-based energy harvesters. The key components, such as piezoelectric layers, magnetic elements, and structural substrates, directly influence the system’s electromechanical coupling, resonant behavior, and power output. Materials such as Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF), a flexible polymer-based piezoelectric material with lower piezoelectric constants than PZT but superior flexibility and mechanical robustness (Derakhshani et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022), Barium Titanate (BaTiO₃), and other lead-free ceramics are emerging alternatives that provide moderate piezoelectric performance while being environmentally friendly (Güçlü et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2015). A macro fiber composite (MFC) made of PZT 5J patch was selected for this research because it offers high piezoelectric coefficients as well as energy conversion efficiency with minimal strain. Materials like NdFeB (Neodymium-Iron-Boron) magnets are widely used due to their exceptionally high magnetic strength, smaller in size and lightweight (Olszewski et al., 2017; Yüksel, 2017). Stronger magnets enhance nonlinear effects and broaden the operational frequency range. Integration of composite piezoelectric materials, such as PZT, in a polymer matrix for improved mechanical flexibility without compromising electrical output can be used for higher efficiency. The design parameters used to develop the hybrid energy harvester are mentioned in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Hybrid vibration energy harvesting configuration (a) without magnetic nonlinearity and (b) with magnetic nonlinearity.

Table 1.

Design parameters of the energy harvester.

Symbol	Description	Values	Unit
L_s	Straight beam length	37	mm
W_s	Straight beam width	17	mm
L_c	Curved beam length	34	mm
W_c	Curved beam width	17	mm
C_c	Curved beam curvature radius	42.5	mm
T_beam	Beam thickness	1	mm
ρ_beam	Piezoelectric patch density	7800	kg/m³
ρ_beam	Beam material density	1270	kg/m³
Θ	Electromagnetic coupling coefficient	–	N/V
C_p	Clamped capacitance	–	F
A_M0714	M0714-P2 piezoelectric active area	98	mm²
r_m	Permanent magnet diameter	12	mm
T_m	Permanent magnet thickness	3	mm
Z_o	Gap between the coil and the magnet	10	mm
N	Number of rings in planar coil	18	–
d_wire	Diameter of copper coil wire	0.375	mm

Working mechanism

When the beam is subjected to external vibrations, it undergoes mechanical deformation, causing strain in the piezoelectric material. This strain generates an electric charge due to the direct piezoelectric effect (Zhao et al., 2022). The curved T-shaped amplifies the beam’s displacement and introduces a new resonant mode of vibration, allowing it to capture more energy from low-frequency vibrations. The electromagnetic generator consists of magnets attached to the free end of the curved and straight beam, and coils are fixed at the structure’s base. The magnet moves relative to the coil as the beam vibrates, creating a changing magnetic flux. According to Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction, this changing flux induces an electromotive force (EMF) in the coil, generating electrical energy (Sarker et al., 2021). Combining piezoelectric and electromagnetic mechanisms, the dual-mode energy harvesting approach ensures higher voltage output and greater adaptability to varying vibration sources (Iqbal et al., 2021). The harvester’s performance is further optimized by incorporating four different mass configurations (M1, M2, M3, and M4), which influence the system’s vibration characteristics and energy output. The number of magnets increased from 1 to 4 for M1 to M4 configurations to increase the tip mass and magnetic flux density.

The T-shaped curved beams exhibit geometric nonlinearities, even under relatively small deformations. These nonlinearities arise due to plane stretching as the beam deflects, its neutral axis stretches, introducing nonlinear stiffness. The relationship between load and displacement becomes nonlinear as the curvature grows (Chen et al., 2021). The curved T-shaped beam experiences different stiff responses in different directions due to asymmetry. Due to these nonlinearities, the system exhibits amplitude-dependent natural frequencies and multiple stable/unstable equilibrium points.

In linear systems, efficient energy harvesting is usually confined to a narrow resonance peak. However, nonlinearities in curved beams enable wider bandwidth as it flattens the frequency response curve, allowing effective operation over a broader range (Zhao et al., 2021).

Theoretical modeling

Piezoelectric energy harvesting

The hybrid energy harvester incorporates eight piezoelectric patches strategically mounted on the surfaces of the cantilever beams. These patches are made of high-performance piezoelectric material, such as PZT (Lead Zirconate Titanate), known for its strong piezoelectric effect (Suprapto et al., 2024). The patches are bonded to the curved T-shaped and straight beams to ensure efficient strain energy capture. At the free tip of each cantilever beam, the flat coil is integrated with cylindrical magnets. This mechanism complements the piezoelectric energy harvesting by converting mechanical vibrations into electrical energy through electromagnetic induction. The electrical output of the piezoelectric patch is governed by equation (1) (Hafizh et al., 2023; Xiao et al., 2015):

M_{e q} \ddot{x} + C_{e q} \dot{x} + K_{e q} x + Θ V_{P} = F (t)

(1)

where M_eq represents equivalent mass, C_eq for equivalent damping, and K_eq for equivalent stiffness. The acceleration, velocity, and displacement of the oscillations are denoted by ẍ, ẋ, and x, respectively. An electromechanical piezoelectric patch’s performance is modeled using V_p as the generated voltage and Θ as the electromechanical coupling coefficient.

The generated current, I, can be represented by the following equation (2) (Muthalif et al., 2022):

{I = C}_{p} d V_{p} / d t + V_{p} / R_{p}

(2)

where C_p is clamped capacitance of the piezoelectric patch, dV_p/dt is rate of change of the generated voltage, V_p is voltage generated across the piezoelectric patch, and R_p load resistance connected to the piezoelectric patch (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Analytical model of hybrid energy harvester (a) without magnetic coupling and (b) with repulsive magnetic coupling of force F_M.

Electromagnetic energy harvesting

The induced voltage V_e in the coil is derived from Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction, which states that the voltage generated in a coil is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil, as expressed by equation (3) (Jiang et al., 2023):

V_{e} = - N d Φ (t) / d t

(3)

where N is the number of turns in the coil and dΦ(t)/dt is the rate of magnetic flux through the coil.

The magnetic flux Φ(t) is defined with equation (4) (Su et al., 2024):

Φ (t) = \int B_{z} \cdot d A

(4)

where B_z is magnetic flux density and dA represents the cross-sectional area of the coil.

The magnetic flux density B_z can be calculated based on the remanent flux density (B_r) using equation (5) (Sarviha et al., 2024):

B_{z} = \frac{B_{r}}{2} [\frac{Z_{o} + T_{m}}{\sqrt{{(Z_{0} + T_{m})}^{2} + r_{m}^{2}}} + \frac{Z_{o}}{\sqrt{{(Z_{o} + r_{m})}^{2}}}]

(5)

where B_r is a remanent flux density of 1.22 T for a permanent magnet made of neodymium, Z_o represents the initial gap between the magnet and coil, r_m is the magnet’s radius, and T_m is the thickness of the cylindrical magnet.

Finite element analysis

Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed using ANSYS software to simulate the energy harvesting performance of the two different designs of hybrid VEH, consisting of T-shaped and curved T-shaped with straight beams. The simulation of harmonic response results with 1 mm displacement showed that the curved T-shaped beam introduces multiple resonant modes at 27.65 and 38.84 Hz, enabling effective energy harvesting over a broad frequency range compared to T-shaped beams, as displayed in Figure 3(a) and (b). Due to their inherent geometry, curved designs are better suited to larger displacements than straight-beam designs. This is particularly advantageous in energy harvesting applications where low-frequency vibrations are prevalent. The ability to accommodate large displacements allows curved structures to capture more kinetic energy from such vibrations, converting it into electrical energy more efficiently. In contrast, T-shaped beams are well-suited for energy harvesting in scenarios where vibrations occur at a single resonance frequency at 25.87 Hz or within a narrow frequency range, as shown in Figure 4. Their uniform geometry and fixed end conditions allow them to resonate efficiently at specific resonance frequencies, making them ideal for applications where the vibration source is consistent and predictable. However, their effectiveness diminishes in environments with variable or broadband frequencies, as they lack the adaptability to respond to a broader range of vibrational inputs, leading to the non-occurrence of the second resonance frequency compared to curved T-shaped beams with the second resonance frequency at 38.84 Hz, as shown in Figure 3(b).

Figure 3.

Curved T-shaped beam’s mode shapes: (a) first resonance frequency at 27.65 Hz and (b) second resonance frequency at 38.84 Hz.

Figure 4.

Mode shape of the T-shaped beam at the first resonance frequency at 25.87 Hz.

The nonlinear stiffness of curved beams, resulting from their unique geometry, allows them to respond to a wider range of frequencies. Unlike straight beams with a linear stiffness and resonating only at specific frequencies, curved beams show extra resonant modes to varying vibrational inputs. This nonlinearity enables them to harvest energy more effectively across a broader spectrum of frequencies, making them suitable for applications where the vibration frequency is not fixed or predictable. The FEA results show that the prototype incorporating curved T-shaped beams has demonstrated the ability to generate higher voltage outputs due to more modes of vibration than those with T-shaped beams within the same range of frequency. This is primarily due to the curved beam’s enhanced flexibility, broader frequency response, and better strain distribution, which collectively improve energy conversion efficiency. The higher voltage output makes curved T-shaped beam designs more attractive for real-world energy harvesting systems, where maximizing energy output is critical. Furthermore, the prototype utilizing curved T-shaped beams is more compact and smaller than T-shaped beams. The simulation results in Figure 5, supported by modal analysis in Figures 3 and 4, show that the curved T-shaped beam introduces additional resonant frequencies at 27.65 Hz, and 38.84 Hz, as well as straight beam at 62.5 Hz, which are absent in the T-shaped beam with resonant frequency at 25.65 Hz, and straight beam at 62.5 Hz. Considering all the advantages of curved T-shaped beam design, the prototype has been developed and tested in the laboratory.

Figure 5.

Output voltage versus frequency response curve from simulation.

Experimental analysis

Fabrication

The hybrid vibration energy harvester (VEH) was constructed using 3D printing technology, with the beam fabricated from PLA (polylactic acid) material and integrated with a commercially available piezoelectric patch, M0714P2, with the capacitance of 11 ± 20% nF, and dimensions of 16 × 16 × 0.3 mm. It is a type of macro fiber composites (MFCs) made of PZT 5J material, which was acquired from Smart Materials Corp., and was firmly bonded to the beam using adhesive. Neodymium magnets, due to their excellent magnetic strength, and copper coils were incorporated into the design to enable electromagnetic induction, with the tip magnets specifically fitted into pre-designed holes at the free end of the beams. The side magnet used to create magnetic nonlinearity is placed 10 mm from the tip magnet in perpendicular orientation to each other. 3D printing was used to create all the components, as depicted in Figure 6, ensuring a cost-effective and customizable fabrication process, highlighting the prototype’s innovative approach to energy harvesting technology.

Figure 6.

Components design of the developed hybrid energy harvester.

Testing setup

The developed prototype was tested under controlled sinusoidal vibrations to evaluate its performance across a wide frequency range. The experimental setup consisted of mounting the energy harvester prototype onto an electromagnetic shaker (DYN-400N model, from DynaLabs), which provided controlled harmonic base excitations across a range of frequencies and amplitudes. The experiments were conducted in the laboratory at room temperature with vibrational excitation frequencies ranging from 1 Hz to 150 Hz, as illustrated in Figure 7. This frequency range was selected to simulate real-world vibrational sources and assess the energy harvesting capabilities of the device under varying conditions (Bouhedma et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023b). The shaker was calibrated to ensure consistent and accurate vibration amplitudes, allowing for reliable measurement of the prototype’s response. A Dewesoft data acquisition (DAQ) device, SIRIUS®, with HS-ACC amplifier with 8 channels and internal input impedance of 1 MΩ was used to record voltage outputs from the piezoelectric and electromagnetic components during testing. Dewesoft’s dynamics signal analyzer was used for the data analysis, as illustrated in Figure 7. The SIRIUS® system offers high-resolution, low-noise signal acquisition with simultaneous sampling capability, ensuring accurate capture of transient and steady-state responses.

Figure 7.

Experimental setup of the hybrid energy harvester and the fabricated prototype.

Results and discussion

Experimental results

The results show that the developed hybrid energy harvester demonstrated varying performance across four tip mass configurations (M1, M2, M3, and M4). The occurrence of multiple resonance frequencies shows the system’s behavior as broadband. The M4 configuration with eight piezoelectric patches achieved the maximum average voltage of 27.81 V with magnetic nonlinearity, while 26.85 V was achieved with the same system without magnetic nonlinearity, as depicted in Figure 8(a) and (b). The increase in bandwidth of the energy harvester with the magnetic nonlinearity has been noticed, which leads to an increase in output voltages (Ibrahim et al., 2017). Table 2 describes the experimental results of both systems, including resonance frequency, peak voltage, lower and upper cutoff frequencies, and bandwidth.

Figure 8.

The output voltage of the energy harvester from piezoelectric (a) with magnetic nonlinearity and (b) without magnetic nonlinearity.

Table 2.

Experimental results of the hybrid energy harvester.

Harvester number	Resonant frequency (Hz)	Peak voltage (V)		Lower cutoff (Hz)	Upper cutoff (Hz)	Bandwidth (Hz)
Harvester number	Resonant frequency (Hz)	Piezo	Electro	Lower cutoff (Hz)	Upper cutoff (Hz)	Bandwidth (Hz)
M4 configuration with magnetic nonlinearity
1	29.44	28.07	0.014	28.86	30.12	1.32
2	29.44	26.55	0.013	28.71	30.03	1.32
3	29.44	23.30	0.027	28.71	30.18	1.47
4	30.03	31.97	0.016	29.44	30.62	1.17
5	29.88	34.38	0.011	29.30	30.47	1.17
6	30.03	29.16	0.018	29.44	30.62	1.17
7	60.06	24.66	0.015	58.45	61.08	2.64
8	59.77	23.66	0.012	58.45	61.23	2.78
M4 configuration without magnetic nonlinearity
1	29.44	29.55	0.013	29.15	30.18	1.03
2	29.44	27.69	0.010	29.01	29.88	0.88
3	29.44	28.75	0.015	29.15	30.18	1.03
4	29.30	34.52	0.015	28.57	29.74	1.17
5	29.15	23.57	0.010	28.42	29.46	1.04
6	29.30	25.31	0.016	28.57	29.74	1.17
7	68.56	22.95	0.013	67.24	69.58	2.34
8	68.56	22.50	0.010	67.24	69.58	2.34

Figure 9(a) and (b) illustrates the output voltage versus frequency curves for the electromagnetic energy harvester configurations of M1, M2, M3, and M4. Among these, the M4 configuration, which incorporates eight electromagnetic energy harvesters, demonstrated the highest performance. With magnetic nonlinearity included, the M4 configuration achieved a maximum average voltage of 0.014 V, compared to 0.012 V without magnetic nonlinearity, maintaining a fixed gap of 10 mm between the coil and magnet. This improvement in voltage output shows the impact of magnetic nonlinearity on enhancing the system’s energy harvesting efficiency. The results also highlight the importance of optimizing the gap distance and incorporating nonlinear magnetic effects to maximize the performance of electromagnetic energy harvesters, particularly in configurations with higher complexity and greater energy harvesting potential. An overall average output power of 0.773 mW and an energy density of 0.0101 W/m³ at 1 MΩ external load and 0.736 nW from electromagnetic induction were achieved with the tip mass configuration M4. In comparison, the average output powers for configurations M1, M2, and M3 were 0.0289 × 10⁻³ mW, 0.957 × 10⁻³ mW, and 0.239 mW, respectively, as illustrated in Figure 10.

Figure 9.

Output voltage curve for electromagnetic energy harvester (a) with magnetic nonlinearity and (b) without magnetic nonlinearity.

Figure 10.

Power output verses frequency response curve of hybrid energy harvester.

The frequency average value (FAV) for the combined (piezoelectric + electromagnetic) energy harvesting performance of the M1, M2, M3, and M4 configurations were calculated for both with and without magnetic nonlinearity. With magnetic nonlinearity, the FAV values were 6.19, 8.25, 9.94, and 11.37 V/Hz for M1, M2, M3, and M4, respectively. Without magnetic nonlinearity, the corresponding FAV values were slightly lower at 5.99, 8.13, 9.87, and 11.27 V/Hz, as illustrated in Figure 11. These results confirm that the harvester’s efficiency improves with a higher tip mass, with the M4 configuration achieving the highest FAV in both cases. This demonstrates that the M4 configuration is the most effective for energy harvesting across a broad frequency range. Additionally, including magnetic nonlinearity further enhances the system’s performance, as evidenced by the higher FAV values, highlighting its role in optimizing energy conversion efficiency. The frequency average value (FAV) was calculated in the frequency range of f₁ = 0 to f₂ = 150 Hz for generated voltage V_i using equation (6), and the calculated values are presented in Table 3.

F A V = \frac{\sum_{f_{1}}^{f_{2}} V_{i}}{f_{2} - f_{1}}

(6)

Figure 11.

Frequency average value (FAV) curve with and without magnetic nonlinearity.

Table 3.

Frequency average value (FAV) of hybrid energy harvester with and without magnetic nonlinearity at the configuration of M4.

Mass configuration	FAV(V/Hz)
Mass configuration	With magnetic nonlinearity	Without magnetic nonlinearity
M1	49.49	47.94
M2	65.69	65.03
M3	79.46	78.92
M4	90.95	90.21

Figure 12 presents a frequency response graph alongside finite element analysis (FEA) mode shapes of curved T-shaped and straight beams operation of vibration energy harvester (VEH) in multi-resonance frequency, indicating the structure’s natural frequencies where vibration amplitude is maximized. The first mode primarily exhibits bending, while higher modes involve torsional and complex deformations. These insights help optimize the placement of piezoelectric patches and electromagnetic components, ensuring maximum energy conversion by targeting high-strain regions and leveraging multiple resonances for broadband energy harvesting.

Figure 12.

Performance of VEH in multi-resonance frequencies.

Comparative analysis

A comparative analysis of several recent studies on hybrid and T-shaped piezoelectric energy harvesters, it is evident that structural design and magnetic coupling significantly influence power output and operational bandwidth. For instance, the reversed tapered T-shaped beam (RTB) harvester demonstrated a peak power output of 4.6 mW with a 12.3%–28.3% reduction in fundamental resonance frequency compared to other T-shaped configurations, indicating the impact of beam tapering and PZT placement (Ibrahim et al., 2024). Similarly, in the study involving magnetic coupling, the addition of magnets increased the output from 0.21 mW to 0.64 mW, while also reducing the resonant frequency from 16.6 Hz to 15.3 Hz, demonstrating the influence of magnet spacing and interaction forces on performance (Zhang et al., 2022). Another T-shaped beam design featuring bimodal frequency response achieved a maximum power of 2.87 mW and improved bandwidth due to bidirectional coupling and geometric optimization (Jiang et al., 2024b). Additional relevant studies further highlight this trend including the innovative MEMS-based T-shaped piezoelectric harvester proposed by Nabavi and Zhang (2019), which provides a comprehensive benchmark for the current design. This MEMS harvester demonstrated a significant enhancement in energy conversion efficiency by over 4.8 times and a 36% reduction in resonant frequency compared to conventional straight-cantilever configurations. The design utilizes both the anchor and tip regions for stress generation, increasing output energy density while maintaining a compact footprint. Furthermore, the T-shaped piezoelectric energy harvesters demonstrate the potential of the design to operate effectively under low-frequency ambient vibrations. FEM simulation results showed a peak displacement of 2.47 mm and stress of 2.39 × 10⁸ N/m² at a resonant frequency of 238.75 Hz under 1 g excitation, validating its suitability for energy harvesting in low-frequency environments (Uddin et al., 2016).

Compared to these, the present work focuses on the geometric optimization of a curved T-shaped beam, achieving competitive output performance while operating in the low-frequency domain. These comparisons reinforce the effectiveness of beam shape design in enhancing energy harvesting efficiency and validate the potential of the proposed configuration for low-frequency ambient vibration applications.

Conclusion

This study presents a novel curved T-shaped beam-based hybrid piezoelectric-electromagnetic VEH with enhanced energy harvesting capabilities and a broadened frequency range. The combination of theoretical modeling, FEA simulations, and experimental validation demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed design.

(1) The integration of curved T-shaped and straight cantilever beams, along with magnetic nonlinearity, enables the system to operate effectively across a broad frequency range.

(2) Experimental results highlight the impact of tip mass variations, with the M4 configuration achieving the combined (piezoelectric + electromagnetic) average voltage output of 27.824 V, showcasing its superior performance at lower and higher frequencies. The piezoelectric harvester achieved a maximum average power output of 0.773 mW and an energy density of 0.0101 W/m³ as well as 0.736 nW for electromagnetic harvester at the configuration M4, validating its potential for low-power systems.

(3) The frequency average value (FAV) analysis reveals a consistent improvement in energy harvesting efficiency with increasing tip mass, with the M4 configuration yielding the highest FAV of 11.37 V/Hz with magnetic nonlinearity and 11.21 V/Hz without magnetic nonlinearity.

(4) The proposed system is highly effective in harvesting energy from broadband vibrational sources, making it ideal for powering low-power devices such as wireless sensors, IoT devices, and wearable electronics like fitness trackers to harvest energy from body movement vibration.

(5) Potential applications include structural health monitoring, industrial automation, and smart infrastructure, where reliable and sustainable energy harvesting is critical.

(6) Implementation strategies, for remote and harsh environments, by designing robust packaging to withstand temperature and extreme humidity. Uses frequency-tuned configurations (e.g., M1–M4) to match the vibration characteristics of the environment for optimal harvesting. Deploy the harvester on vibrating machinery or infrastructure. The harvester can directly power microcontrollers and RF modules like ZigBee or LoRa, reducing the need for battery replacement. A simple power management circuit with a capacitor or supercapacitor can be used for energy storage.

(7) Using 3D printing technology for fabrication ensures cost-effectiveness, design flexibility, and scalability, making the harvester suitable for diverse applications.

Footnotes

ORCID iDs

Mohammad Farhan

Asan G. A. Muthalif

Author contributions

Mohammad Farhan: Data curation, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing.

Asan G. A. Muthalif: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, visualization, and writing—review and editing.

Mohamed Sultan Mohamed Ali: Methodology, validation, and writing—review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work is supported through the Qatar University Graduate Assistantship Grant. Open Access publication funding is provided by the Qatar National Library (QNL).

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Bouhedma

Schütz

, et al. (2022) Analysis and characterization of optimized dual-frequency vibration energy harvesters for low-power industrial applications. Micromachines 13(7): 1078.

Chen

Zhang

Chen

, et al. (2021) A curve-shaped beam bistable piezoelectric energy harvester with variable potential well: modeling and numerical simulation. Micromachines 12(8): 995.

Chen

Liao

Xia

, et al. (2023) Variable-potential bistable nonlinear energy sink for enhanced vibration suppression and energy harvesting. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 242: 107997.

Derakhshani

Momenzadeh

Berfield

(2021) Analytical and experimental study of a clamped-clamped, bistable buckled beam low-frequency PVDF vibration energy harvester. Journal of Sound and Vibration 497: 115937.

Dong

Closson

Jin

, et al. (2019) Vibration-energy-harvesting system: transduction mechanisms, frequency tuning techniques, and biomechanical applications. Advanced Materials Technologies 4(10): 1900177.

Farhan

Muthalif

AGA

Ali

MSM

(2024) Innovative approaches to optimize vibration energy harvesting (VEH): a comprehensive review. Energy Reports 12(August): 5194–5219.

Güçlü

Kasım

Yazici

(2023) Investigation of the optimum vibration energy harvesting performance of electrospun PVDF/BaTiO3 nanogenerator. Journal of Composite Materials 57(3): 409–424.

Guo

Long

Bai

, et al. (2022) Variable stiffness triboelectric nano-generator to harvest high-speed railway bridge’s vibration energy. Energy Conversion and Management 268(6): 115969. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115969.

Hafizh

Muthalif

AGA

Renno

, et al. (2023) Vortex induced vibration energy harvesting using magnetically coupled broadband circular-array piezoelectric patch: modelling, parametric study, and experiments. Energy Conversion and Management 276(September 2022): 116559.

10.

Halim

Humayun Kabir

Cho

, et al. (2019) A frequency up-converted hybrid energy harvester using transverse impact-driven piezoelectric bimorph for human-limb motion. Micromachines 10(10): 701.

11.

Liu

, et al. (2024) A piezoelectric-electromagnetic hybrid energy harvester for low-frequency wave motion and self-sensing wave environment monitoring. Energy Conversion and Management 300(8): 117920.

12.

Hou

Shan

, et al. (2022) A broadband piezo-electromagnetic hybrid energy harvester under combined vortex-induced and base excitations. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 171: 108963.

13.

Huang

(2024) Exploiting multi-stiffness combination inspired absorbers for simultaneous energy harvesting and vibration mitigation. Applied Energy 364(March): 123124.

14.

Huang

Yang

(2021) Improving energy harvesting from impulsive excitations by a nonlinear tunable bistable energy harvester. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 158(1): 107797.

15.

Huang

Zhong

(2023) Hydrokinetic energy harvesting from flow-induced vibration of a hollow cylinder attached with a bi-stable energy harvester. Energy Conversion and Management 278(3): 116718.

16.

Huang

Hua

Chen

(2024) Exploiting a novel magnetoelastic tunable bi-stable energy converter for vibration energy mitigation. Nonlinear Dynamics 113(3): 2017–2043.

17.

Ibrahim

Muthalif

AGA

Nordin

NHD

, et al. (2017) Comparative study of conventional and magnetically coupled piezoelectric energy harvester to optimize output voltage and bandwidth. Microsystem Technologies 23(7): 2663–2674.

18.

Ibrahim

Shen

Javaid

, et al. (2024) Experimental-numerical analyses on energy harvesting characteristics of non-conventional T-shaped beams with varied piezoelectric patch location and anchor position. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 52(11): 8839–8864.

19.

Iqbal

Nauman

Khan

, et al. (2021) Vibration-based piezoelectric, electromagnetic, and hybrid energy harvesters for microsystems applications: a contributed review. International Journal of Energy Research 45(1): 65–102.

20.

Jiang

Liu

Feng

, et al. (2021) A review of piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting with magnetic coupling based on different structural characteristics. Micromachines 12(4): 1–34.

21.

Jiang

Zhu

, et al. (2023) A hybrid piezoelectric and electromagnetic broadband harvester with double cantilever beams. Micromachines 14(2): 240.

22.

Jiang

Antwi-Afari

Fadaie

, et al. (2024a) Self-powered wearable internet of things sensors for human-machine interfaces: a systematic literature review and science mapping analysis. Nano Energy 131(PA): 110252.

23.

Jiang

Sheng

, et al. (2024b) A bidirectional T-Shaped energy harvester: modeling, simulation, and experiment. Energy Technology 12(7): 1–11.

24.

Jiang

Zhou

, et al. (2024c) Modeling and analysis of beam-spring magnetically coupled bistable energy harvester for broadband vibration energy harvesting. Journal of Sound and Vibration 579(September 2023): 118373.

25.

Upadrashta

, et al. (2019) Comparative study of core materials and multi-degree-of-freedom sandwich piezoelectric energy harvester with inner cantilevered beams. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 52(23): 235501.

26.

Dong

Cao

, et al. (2023a) Nonlinear dynamical and harvesting characteristics of bistable energy harvester under hybrid base vibration and galloping. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 125(14): 107400.

27.

Ouro-Koura

Arnow

, et al. (2023b) Broadband vibration-based energy harvesting for wireless sensor applications using frequency upconversion. Sensors 23(11): 5296.

28.

Liang

Hao

Olszewski

(2021) A review on vibration-based piezoelectric energy harvesting from the aspect of compliant mechanisms. Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical 331: 112743.

29.

Liao

Fang

(2025) A centrifugal spring mechanism empowers self-adjusting in piezoelectric wind energy harvesting. Nano Energy 133(November 2024): 110462.

30.

Liu

Wang

, et al. (2022) Three frequency up-converting piezoelectric energy harvesters caused by internal resonance mechanism: a narrative review. Micromachines 13(2): 210.

31.

Liu

Jia

, et al. (2023) Piezoelectric wind energy harvester of bi-stable hybrid symmetric laminates. Composites Science and Technology 242: 110198.

32.

Luo

Gao

Wang

(2021) The triboelectric nanogenerator as an innovative technology toward intelligent sports. Advanced Materials 33(17): 2004178.

33.

Zhou

Gong

, et al. (2023) Design and development of a broadband vibration energy harvester suitable for tractor exhaust cylinder vibration. Sensors 23(1): 286.

34.

Mei

Zhou

(2023) A comprehensive theoretical model for the centrifugal effect of nonlinear beam-type piezoelectrical energy harvesters in rotational motions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 189: 110106.

35.

Muthalif

AGA

Hafizh

Renno

, et al. (2022) A hybrid piezoelectric-electromagnetic energy harvester from vortex-induced vibrations in fluid-flow; the influence of boundary condition in tuning the harvester. Energy Conversion and Management 256(February): 115371.

36.

Nabavi

Zhang

(2019) T-Shaped piezoelectric structure for high-performance MEMS vibration energy harvesting. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 28(6): 1100–1112.

37.

Naseer

Abdelkefi

(2022) Nonlinear modeling and efficacy of VIV-based energy harvesters: monostable and bistable designs. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 169(December 2021): 108775.

38.

Olszewski

Houlihan

Blake

, et al. (2017) Evaluation of vibrational PiezoMEMS harvester that scavenges energy from a magnetic field surrounding an AC current-carrying wire. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 26(6): 1298–1305.

39.

Ordoñez

Arcos

Romeu

, et al. (2021) Analysis of different cylindrical magnet and coil configurations for electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences 9(2): 1055–1063.

40.

Pertin

Guha

(2022) Hybrid nonlinear vibration energy harvester due to combined effect of stretching and magnetic-induced nonlinearity. In: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering.

41.

Pertin

Guha

Jakšić

, et al. (2022) Investigation of nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester for low-frequency and wideband applications. Micromachines 13(9): 1399.

42.

Qian

Zuo

(2019) Piezoelectric energy harvesting from human walking using a two-stage amplification mechanism. Energy 189: 116140.

43.

Sarker

Saad

MHM

Olazagoitia

, et al. (2021) Review of power converter impact of electromagnetic energy harvesting circuits and devices for autonomous sensor applications. Electronics 10(9): 1108.

44.

Sarviha

Barati

Zarkak

, et al. (2024) Experimental investigations on the wake-induced vibration of an electromagnetic energy-harvesting system. International Journal of Energy Research.

45.

Sharma

Kiran

Azad

, et al. (2022) A review of piezoelectric energy harvesting tiles: available designs and future perspective. Energy Conversion and Management 254(December 2021): 115272.

46.

Shim

Sun

Kim

, et al. (2022) On a nonlinear broadband piezoelectric energy harvester with a coupled beam array. Applied Energy 328(51): 120129.

47.

Sun

Wang

(2024) Design and evaluation of a piezoelectric-electromagnetic energy harvester with a lever structure. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 220(June): 111642.

48.

Sun

Yao

, et al. (2020) Tunable, multi-modal, and multi-directional vibration energy harvester based on three-dimensional architected metastructures. Applied Energy 264(February): 114615.

49.

Suprapto Ting

Gunawan

, et al. (2024) Fabrication and characterization of PZT/PVDF composite films for force sensor applications. Polymer International 73(9): 727–747.

50.

Thainiramit

Yingyong

Isarakorn

(2020) Impact-driven energy harvesting: piezoelectric versus triboelectric energy harvesters. Sensors 20(20): 1–20.

51.

Uddin

Islam

Sampe

, et al. (2016) Vibration based T-shaped piezoelectric cantilever beam design using finite element method for energy harvesting devices. In: IEEE international conference on semiconductor electronics, proceedings, ICSE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 17–19 August 2016.

52.

Wang

Mai

Wang

, et al. (2015) High quality barium titanate nanofibers for flexible piezoelectric device applications. Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical 233: 195–201.

53.

Wang

Chen

Zhou

, et al. (2017) Piezoelectric vibration energy harvester with two-stage force amplification. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 28(9): 1175–1187.

54.

Wang

Lan

Zeng

, et al. (2022) Vibration energy conversion power supply based on the piezoelectric thin film planar array. Sensors 22(21): 8506.

55.

Xiao

Wang

John

(2015) A dimensionless analysis of a 2DOF piezoelectric vibration energy harvester. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 58–59: 355–375.

56.

Yamane

Tamura

Nota

, et al. (2022) Contactless electrostatic vibration energy harvesting using electric double layer electrets. Sensors and Materials 34(5): 1869.

57.

Yang

Zhou

, et al. (2018) High-performance piezoelectric energy harvesters and their applications. Joule 2(4): 642–697.

58.

Zhang

Shan

, et al. (2023) A novel bird-shape broadband piezoelectric energy harvester for low frequency vibrations. Micromachines 14(2): 421.

59.

Yüksel

(2017) The use of neodymium magnets in healthcare and their effects on health. Northern Clinics of Istanbul 5(3): 268–273.

60.

Zhang

Qin

(2019) A tunable frequency up-conversion wideband piezoelectric vibration energy harvester for low-frequency variable environment using a novel impact- and rope-driven hybrid mechanism. Applied Energy 240: 26–34.

61.

Zhang

Sui

Yang

, et al. (2022) An asymmetric magnetic-coupled bending-torsion piezoelectric energy harvester: modeling and experimental investigation. Smart Materials and Structures 31(1): 015037.

62.

Zhang

Huang

Wang

(2024) A quad-stable nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester with piecewise stiffness for broadband energy harvesting. Nonlinear Dynamics 112(22): 19633–19652.

63.

Zhao

Zou

Yan

, et al. (2019) Magnetic coupling and flextensional amplification mechanisms for high-robustness ambient wind energy harvesting. Energy Conversion and Management 201(4): 112166.

64.

Zhao

(2021) The research on damage detection of curved beam based on piezoelectric vibration energy harvester. Lixue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 55(11): 3035–3044.

65.

Zhao

Thomsen

De Ponti

, et al. (2022) A graded metamaterial for broadband and high-capability piezoelectric energy harvesting. Energy Conversion and Management 269(August): 116056.

66.

Zhu

Zhang

, et al. (2022) A magnetically coupled piezoelectric–electromagnetic low-frequency multidirection hybrid energy harvester. Micromachines 13(5): 761.

Hybrid piezoelectric-electromagnetic energy harvester using a nonlinear curved T-shaped beam for broadband applications

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Design and working principle

Geometry and configuration

Working mechanism

Theoretical modeling

Piezoelectric energy harvesting

Electromagnetic energy harvesting

Finite element analysis

Experimental analysis

Fabrication

Testing setup

Results and discussion

Experimental results

Comparative analysis

Conclusion

Footnotes

ORCID iDs

Author contributions

Funding

Declaration of conflicting interests

References