To investigate the mechanism of noise reduction of landing gear hubs, the noise suppression effect and mechanism of an annular groove (simplification of an annular wheel hub rim) on an annular cavity (simplification of an annular wheel hub) have been studied computationally using the Detached Eddy Simulation method combined with the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings acoustic analogy in this paper. The Mach number of the freestream is from 0.13 to 0.21. The results demonstrated that the annular groove alters the boundary layer profile in the vicinity of the annular cavity. This causes the kinetic energy within the boundary layer to move towards the upper boundary layer, the boundary layer displacement thickness to increase, and the flow mass loss to increase. Concurrently, the annular groove results in a reduction in shear layer flow velocity, thereby weakening the interaction of the flow with the center cylinder (simplification of a wheel axle), the rear-edge and the internal wall of the annular cavity, reducing the velocity fluctuation and the turbulent kinetic energy near the annular cavity walls. This suppresses the intensity of flow-acoustic feedback noise, while simultaneously suppresses the intensity of both the acoustic feedback noise and the turbulent broadband noise.
AhujaKKMendosaJ (1995) Effects of cavity dimensions, boundary layer and temperature on cavity noise with emphasis on benchmark data to validate computational aeroacoustics code. NASA-CR-4653.
2.
BasnerMBabischWDavisA, et al. (2014) Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet383(9925): 1325–1332.
3.
CattafestaLNIIISongQWilliamsDR, et al. (2008) Active control of flow-induced cavity oscillations. Progress in Aerospace Sciences44(7–8): 479–502.
4.
DudleyJGUkeileyL (2011) Detached eddy simulation of a supersonic cavity flow with and without passive flow control. In: Proceeding of the 20th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference. Honolulu, Hawaii: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
5.
Ffowcs-WilliamsJEHawkingsDL (1969) Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A264: 321–342.
6.
FlahertyWReedyTMElliottGS, et al. (2014) Investigation of cavity flow using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA Journal52(11): 2462–2470.
7.
GuoZLiuPGuoH (2020) Investigation on spatial distribution of acoustic resonance in annular cavity: frequency and intensity. International Journal of Aeroacoustics19(1–2): 73–94.
8.
GuoZLiuPGouH (2021) Control effect on deep cavity noise by slanted walls at low mach numbers. Journal of Vibration and Control27(9–10): 998–1008.
9.
HellerHHBlissDB (1975) The physical mechanisms of flow-induced pressure fluctuations in cavities and concepts for their suppression. AIAA Paper: 75–491.
10.
KellerJJEscudierMP (1983) Flow-excited resonances in covered caviies. Journal of Sound and Vibration86(2): 199–226.
11.
LawsonSJBarakosGN (2009) Assessment of passive flow control for transonic cavity flow using detached eddy simulation. Journal of Aircraft46(3): 1009–1029.
12.
LawsonSJBarakosGN (2011) Review of numerical simulations for high-speed, turbulent cavity flows. Progress in Aerospace Sciences47(3): 186–216.
13.
LevasseurVSagautPMalletM, et al. (2008) Unstructured large eddy simulation of the passive control of the flow in a weapon Bay. Journal of Fluids and Structures24: 1204–1215.
14.
LiuWKimJWZhangX, et al. (2013) Landing-gear noise prediction using high-order finite difference schemes. Journal of Sound and Vibration332(14): 3517–3534.
15.
LuWZhengG (2023) Passive control on deep cavity noise at subsonic speeds by leading-edge grooves. Journal of Vibration and Control30(2023): 11–25.
16.
ManohaEBultéJCiobacaV, et al. (2009) LAGOON : further analysis of aerodynamic experiments and early aeroacoustics results. In: 15th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference. Miami, Florida: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009–3277.
17.
MarsdenOBaillyCBogeyC, et al. (2012) Investigation of flow features and acoustic radiation of a round cavity. Journal of Sound and Vibration331(15): 3521–3543.
18.
PrudhommeDChinDReederMF, et al. (2021) Flight tests of passive flow control for suppression of cavity aeroacoustics. Journal of Aircraft58(4): 907–916.
19.
RobertLStallingsJ (1983) Store separation from cavities at supersonic flight speeds. J Spacecraft20(2): 129–132.
20.
RocioMManelSIvetteR, et al. (2022) On the flow and passive noise control of an open cavity at re = 5000. Flow Turbulence Combust108(1): 123–148.
21.
RockwellDNaudascherE (1979) Self-sustained oscillations of impinging free shear layer. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics11: 67–94.
22.
RoshkoA (1955) Some Measurements of Flow in a Rectangular Cutout. Pasadena, California: California Institute of Technology, NACA Technical Notes, 3488.
23.
RossiterJ (1964) Wind-tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. Aeronautical Research Council Reports & Memoranda: 3488.
24.
SaddingtonAJKnowlesKThangamaniV (2016a) Scale effects on the performance of sawtooth spoilers in transonic rectangular cavity flow. Experiments in Fluids57(2): 1–12.
25.
SaddingtonAJThangamaniVKnowlesK (2016b) Comparison of passive flow control methods for a cavity in transonic flow. Journal of Aircraft53(5): 1439–1447.
26.
SarpotdarSPanickarPRamanG (2010) Stability of a hybrid mean velocity profile and its relevance to cavity resonance suppression. Physics of Fluids22: 076101.
27.
SarradjEFritzscheCGeyerT, et al. (2009) Acoustic and aerodynamic design and characterization of a small-scale aeroacoustic wind tunnel. Applied Acoustics70: 1073–1080.
28.
SchmitRSemmelmayerFHaverkampM, et al. (2012) Examining passive flow control using high speed shadowgraph images around a mach 1.5 cavity flowfield. In: Proceeding of the 6th AIAA flow control conference. New Orleans, Louisiana: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
29.
TamCKWBlockPJW (1978) On the tones and pressure oscillations induced by flow over rectangular cavities. Journal of Fluid Mechanics89(2): 373–399.
30.
ThangamaniVKnowlesKSaddingtonAJ (2012) The effects of scaling on high subsonic cavity flow oscallitions and control. In: 18th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Colorado Springs, CO, 04–06 June 2012, 2012–2050.
31.
ThangamaniVKnowlesKSaddingtonAJ (2013) An investigation of passive control methods for a large scale cavity model in high subsonic flow. In: 19th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Berlin, Germany, 27–29 May 2013, 2013–2049.
32.
WangMAnglandDZhangX (2017) The noise generated by a landing gear wheel with hub and rim cavities. Journal of Sound and Vibration392(2017): 127–141.
33.
WangQChenXZhangY, et al. (2022) Research on vehicle window buffeting mechanism and noise control. International Journal of Vehicle Design88(2–4): 95–120.
34.
ZhangQFengSZhouF, et al. (2023) Experimental investigation of passive control for cavity noise in high-speed flow using sawtooth spoiler. Applied Acoustics211(2023): 109567.
