The motion of wing rock varies unpredictably with changes in the angle of attack (AOA) and is highly susceptible to external disturbances. This paper presents a robust adaptive control strategy based on an observer, utilizing Fourier Series (FS) polynomials to estimate uncertainties and suppress wing rock oscillations. The unmodeled dynamics, external disturbances, and uncertainties are first modeled using the Fourier series. The adaptation laws, obtained through analyzing the stability, are subsequently used to adjust its coefficients. A distinctive feature of the suggested design is that it does not require a precise model of the plant or any data about roll rate signal measurements and uncertainties, which enhances cost-effectiveness and applicability in real-world systems. The paper employs the Lyapunov lemma to ensure that the error signals in the controlled system stay uniformly ultimately bounded (UUB). Simulation results showcase the effectiveness and versatility of the proposed approach. The outcomes are compared with two advanced approximation techniques to demonstrate the precision and effectiveness of the suggested controller design.
Abdul-KareemAIHasanAFAl-QassarAA, et al. (2022) Rejection of wing-rock motion in delta wing aircrafts based on optimal LADRC schemes with butterfly optimization algorithm. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology17: 2476–2495.
2.
AndrievskyBKudryashovaEVKuznetsovNV, et al. (2020) Aircraft wing rock oscillations suppression by simple adaptive control. Aerospace Science and Technology105: 106049.
3.
ArteagaMAKellyR (2004) Robot control without velocity measurements: new theory and experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation20: 297–308.
4.
BenchaitaHLadaciS (2021) Fractional adaptive SMC fault tolerant control against actuator failures for wing rock supervision. Aerospace Science and Technology114: 106745.
5.
BeyOChemachemaM (2024a) Decentralized event‐triggered output feedback adaptive neural network control for a class of MIMO uncertain strict‐feedback nonlinear systems with input saturation. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing38: 1420–1441.
6.
BeyOChemachemaM (2024b) Finite-time event-triggered output-feedback adaptive decentralized echo-state network fault-tolerant control for interconnected pure-feedback nonlinear systems with input saturation and external disturbances: a fuzzy control-error approach. Information Sciences669: 120557.
7.
BhanLShiYKrsticM (2023) Operator learning for nonlinear adaptive control In: Learning for Dynamics and Control Conference. PMLR, 346–357.
8.
BounemeurAChemachemaM (2021) Adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control using Nussbaum-type function with state-dependent actuator failures. Neural Computing & Applications33: 191–208.
9.
BounemeurAChemachemaM (2024) Optimal adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control applied on a quadrotor attitude stabilization based on particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part I: Journal of Systems & Control Engineering238: 704–719.
10.
BounemeurAchemachemaMZahafA, et al. (2021) Adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control using Nussbaum gain for a class of SISO nonlinear systems with unknown directions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Control Applications: ICEECA 2019, 17–19 December 2019, Constantine, Algeria. Springer, 493–510.
11.
BounemeurAZahafAChemachemaM (2023) PID controller for precise voltage output of solid oxide fuel cell. In: International Conference of Nanotechnology for Environmental Protection and Clean Energy Production. Springer, 319–326.
12.
DeylamiAIzadbakhshA (2022) Observer‐based adaptive control of cooperative multiple manipulators using the Mastroianni operators as uncertainty approximator. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control32: 3625–3646.
13.
ElzebdaJNayfehAMookD (1989) Development of an analytical model of wing rock for slender delta wings. Journal of Aircraft26: 737–743.
14.
GuglieriGQuagliottiF (1997) Experimental observation and discussion of the wing rock phenomenon. Aerospace Science and Technology1: 111–123.
15.
HsuC-HLanCE (1985) Theory of wing rock. Journal of Aircraft22: 920–924.
16.
HuangA-CChienM-C (2010) Adaptive control of robot manipulators: a unified regressor-free approach. World scientific.
17.
HumaidiAHameedA (2017) Robust MRAC for a wing rock phenomenon in delta wing aircrafts. AUT Journal of Modeling and Simulation49: 113–122.
18.
IzadbakhshARafieiS (2008) Robust control methodologies for optical micro electro mechanical system-new approaches and comparison. In: 2008 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference. IEEE, 2102–2107.
19.
IzadbakhshAKalatAAFatehMM, et al. (2011) A robust anti-windup control design for electrically driven robots—theory and experiment. International Journal of Control Automation and Systems9: 1005–1012.
20.
IzadbakhshAKhorashadizadehSKheirkhahanP (2020) Real-time fuzzy fractional-order control of electrically driven flexible-joint robots. AUT Journal of Modeling and Simulation52: 11–18.
21.
IzadbakhshADeylamiAKhorashadizadehS (2022) Superiority of q-Chlodowsky operators versus fuzzy systems and neural networks: application to adaptive impedance control of electrical manipulators. Expert Systems with Applications209: 118249.
22.
KoriDKKolheJPTaloleS (2014) Extended state observer based robust control of wing rock motion. Aerospace Science and Technology33: 107–117.
23.
LeeKWSinghSN (2013) Chebyshev neural noncertainty-equivalent adaptive control of wing rock of slender delta wings. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, AIAA, Vol. 4511.
LeeKWSinghSN (2022) Composite adaptive wing-rock control with regressor integral excitation. In: AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum. AIAA, 0492.
26.
LeeKWGhorawatPSinghSN (2016) Wing rock control by finite-form adaptation. Journal of Vibration and Control22: 2687–2703.
27.
LevinDKatzJ (1984) Dynamic load measurements with delta wings undergoing self-induced roll oscillations. Journal of Aircraft21: 30–36.
28.
LiDIgnatyevDTsourdosA, et al. (2021) Region of attraction analysis for adaptive control of wing rock system. IFAC-PapersOnLine54: 518–523.
29.
LiDTsourdosAWangZ, et al. (2022) Nonlinear analysis for wing-rock system with adaptive control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics45: 2174–2181.
30.
LinC-MHsuC-F (2004) Supervisory recurrent fuzzy neural network control of wing rock for slender delta wings. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems12: 733–742.
31.
LiuLLiuY-JTongS, et al. (2021) Relative threshold-based event-triggered control for nonlinear constrained systems with application to aircraft wing rock motion. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics18: 911–921.
32.
MalekzadehMSadatiJAlizadehM (2016) Adaptive PID controller design for wing rock suppression using self-recurrent wavelet neural network identifier. Evolving Systems7: 267–275.
33.
NayfehAElzebdaJMookD (1989) Analytical study of the subsonic wing-rock phenomenon for slender delta wings. Journal of Aircraft26: 805–809.
34.
OrdonezRPassinoKM (2000) Wing rock regulation with a time-varying angle of attack. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control. Held Jointly with the 8th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (Cat. No. 00CH37147). IEEE, 145–150.
35.
PatraJCKotAC (2002) Nonlinear dynamic system identification using Chebyshev functional link artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)32: 505–511.
36.
RongH-JHanSZhaoG-S (2014) Adaptive fuzzy control of aircraft wing-rock motion. Applied Soft Computing14: 181–193.
37.
RoshanianJRahimzadeE (2021) Model reference adaptive control using a new adaptation law based on power-series quadratic lyapunov functions for the single degree of freedom wing rock phenomenon. Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology14: 11–29.
38.
RoshanianJRahimzadehE (2021) Novel model reference adaptive control with application to wing rock example. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering235: 1911–1929.
39.
ShueS-PAgarwalRKShiP (2000) Nonlinear H method for control of wing rock motions. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics23: 60–68.
40.
TaloleSEPhadkeSB (2009) Robust input–output linearisation using uncertainty and disturbance estimation. International Journal of Control82: 1794–1803.
41.
TaoC-WTaurJ-SChangC-W, et al. (2012) Simplified type-2 fuzzy sliding controller for wing rock system. Fuzzy Sets and Systems207: 111–129.
42.
WuDChenMGongH, et al. (2017) Robust backstepping control of wing rock using disturbance observer. Applied Sciences7: 219.
43.
YinHZhangXHuangX, et al. (2019) Two novel robust tracking control strategies for eliminating aircraft wing rock. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering233: 3042–3055.
44.
YousefimaneshAKhosraviASarhadiP (2019) Composite adaptive posicast controller for the wing rock phenomenon in a delta-wing aircraft. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering233: 5579–5591.
45.
ZahafABounemeurABououdenS (2023) Wind turbine energy production based on event-triggered speed control. In: International Conference of Nanotechnology for Environmental Protection and Clean Energy Production. Springer, 311–318.
46.
ZhangXHuLSunH, et al. (2023) Robust forwarding control of aircraft wing rock using neural networks. In: 2023 9th International Conference on Control Science and Systems Engineering (ICCSSE). IEEE, 13–19.
