Time delay is unavoidable in practical engineering, and it causes the system to undergo complex dynamic behavior. Therefore, clarifying its effect on the system will help to accurately assess the safety and stability of high-speed maglev vehicles operating on bridges under crosswind conditions. The proportional-integral-derivative (PID) is used as a feedback controller to derive the transfer function of the closed-loop system considering the gap feedback time delay. The calculation formula for the critical time delay of the system is obtained using the Routh criterion. A spatially coupled vibration model of the maglev train-bridge-wind system considering the control delay is established, and the accuracy of the model is verified by comparing it with the field measurement results. The responses of the train and bridge under different time delays, wind speeds, and control parameters are calculated. The results show that in the train-bridge-wind coupled vibration model, the critical time delay of the suspension system is basically the same as the theoretical value, while the critical time delay of the guidance system slightly exceeds the theoretical value. Vehicle dynamic response increases with wind speed and time delay. The greater the wind speed, the greater the effect of time delay on the dynamic response of the bridge and the train. The time delay will reduce the wind speed threshold for safe and smooth train operation, which is 30 m/s and 15 m/s for lateral acceleration of the car body for time delays of 0 ms and 10.5 ms, respectively. By appropriately reducing the proportional and integral gain coefficient and increasing the differential gain coefficient, the effect of the control time delay on the system can be mitigated.
AhmedHM (2009) Controllability of fractional stochastic delay equations. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics30: 195–202.
2.
AhmedHM (2010) Boundary controllability of nonlinear fractional integrodifferential systems. Advances in Difference Equations2010(1): 279493.
3.
AhmedHM (2021) Conformable fractional stochastic differential equations with control function. Systems & Control Letters158: 105062.
4.
BuXMWangLDHanY, et al. (2024) Dynamic model of high-speed maglev train-guideway bridge system with a nonlinear suspension controller. Advances in Structural Engineering27(8): 1328–1348.
5.
CJJ/T 310—2021 (2021) Standard for Design of High-Speed Maglev Transit. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese).
6.
FengYZhaoCFWuDH, et al. (2023) Effect of levitation gap feedback time delay on the EMS maglev vehicle system dynamic response. Nonlinear Dynamics111(8): 7137–7156.
7.
HanJBKimKJ (2018) Characteristics of vibration in magnetically levitated trains subjected to crosswind. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transi232(5): 1347–1359.
8.
HanYLiuYHuP, et al. (2023) Establishment of aerodynamic force model with varying wind yaw angles and its influences on the safety and comfort of the rail vehicle. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics232: 105271.
9.
HuPHanYCaiCS, et al. (2019) New analytical models for power spectral density and coherence function of wind turbulence relative to a moving vehicle under crosswinds. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics188: 384–396.
10.
JTG/T 3360-01—2018 (2018) Wind-resistant Design Specification for Highway Bridges. Beijing: China Communication Press. (in Chinese).
11.
KwonSDLeeJSMoonJW, et al. (2008) Dynamic interaction analysis of urban transit maglev vehicle and guideway suspension bridge subjected to gusty wind. Engineering Structures30(12): 3445–3456.
12.
LiYLQiangSZLiaoHL, et al. (2005) Dynamics of wind–rail vehicle–bridge systems. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics93(6): 483–507.
13.
LinPLiuHKZhouWW (2020) Analysis of gap time-delay in maglev control system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1487(1): 012038.
14.
LiuYHanYLiCG, et al. (2023) Aerodynamic characteristics and dynamic performance of the moving train under crosswind. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics23(11): 2350121.
15.
LiuHCCaoZKangHM, et al. (2024) Adaptive backstepping dynamic sliding mode control for maglev turning motor spindle based on limited time preset performance. Journal of Vibration and Control30(11–12): 2759–2774.
16.
SayedAAMAhmedHMNofalTA, et al. (2024) Hilfer-Katugampola fractional epidemic model for malware propagation with optimal control. Ain Shams Engineering Journal15(10): 102945.
17.
ShiJWangYJ (2010) Dynamic response analysis of single-span guideway caused by high speed maglev train. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures8(3): 213–228.
18.
ShiJFangWSWangYJ, et al. (2014) Measurements and analysis of track irregularities on high speed maglev lines. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A15(6): 385–394.
19.
SuXYXuYLYangXF (2022) Neural network adaptive sliding mode control without overestimation for a maglev system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing168: 108661.
20.
SunYGXieSXuJQ, et al. (2020) A robust levitation control of maglev vehicles subject to time delay and disturbances: design and hardware experimentation. Applied Sciences10(3): 1179–1195.
21.
SunYGXuJQChenC, et al. (2022a) Reinforcement learning-based optimal tracking control for levitation system of maglev vehicle with input time delay. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement71: 1–13.
22.
SunYGXuJQLinGB, et al. (2022b) RBF neural network-based supervisor control for maglev vehicles on an elastic track with network time delay. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics18(1): 509–519.
23.
SunYGWangSMLuY, et al. (2022c) Control of time delay in magnetic levitation systems. IEEE Magnetics Letters13: 1–5.
24.
TB 10621−2014 (2014) Code for Design of High Speed Railway. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House. (in Chinese).
25.
TianXFXiangHYChenXL, et al. (2023) Dynamic response analysis of high-speed maglev train-guideway system under crosswinds. Journal of Central South University30(08): 2757–2771.
26.
TianXFXiangHYZhuJ, et al. (2022) Effect of long-wave deviation of stator plane on high-speed maglev train and guideway system. Journal of Vibration and Control29(9–10): 2348–2362.
27.
WangH (2007) Vehicle-Guideway Dynamic Interaction of the EMS Low Speed Maglev Vehicle. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology. (in Chinese).
28.
WangHPLiJZhangK (2007) Stability and Hopf bifurcation of the maglev system with delayed speed feedback control. Acta Automatica Sinica33(8): 829–834.
29.
WangHPLiJZhangK (2008a) Sup-Resonant response of a nonautonomous maglev system with delayed acceleration feedback control. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics44(10): 2338–2350.
30.
WangHPLiJZhangK (2008b) Non-resonant response, bifurcation and oscillation suppression of a non-autonomous system with delayed position feedback control. Nonlinear Dynamics51(3): 447–464.
31.
WangZLXuYLLiGQ, et al. (2018) Modelling and validation of coupled high-speed maglev train-and-viaduct systems considering support flexibility. Vehicle System Dynamics57(2): 161–191.
32.
WangLDZhangXLiuHY, et al. (2022) Global reliability analysis of running safety of a train traversing a bridge under crosswinds. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics224: 104979.
33.
WangXFHuXWangJK, et al. (2023) Safety analysis of high temperature superconducting maglev train considering the aerodynamic loads under crosswinds. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science237(10): 2279–2290.
34.
WangLDBuXMHuP, et al. (2024a) Dynamic reliability analysis of running safety and stability of a high-speed maglev train on a guideway bridge. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics24(04): 2450043.
35.
WangXXuFYZhangZZ, et al. (2024b) 3D LES numerical investigation of vertical vortex-induced vibrations of a 4:1 rectangular cylinder. Advances in Wind Engineering1(1): 100008.
36.
WangYGuoWLiangX, et al. (2024c) Boundary coordination algorithm for real-time hybrid test of high-speed maglev train-guideway coupling vibration. Engineering Structures314: 118355.
37.
WuHZengXHGaoDG, et al. (2021a) Dynamic stability of an electromagnetic suspension maglev vehicle under steady aerodynamic load. Applied Mathematical Modelling97: 483–500.
38.
WuHZengXHGaoDG (2021b) Periodic response and stability of a maglev system with delayed feedback control under aerodynamic lift. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics21(03): 2150040.
39.
XuJQChenCGaoDG, et al. (2017) Nonlinear dynamic analysis on maglev train system with flexible guideway and double time-delay feedback control. Journal of Vibroengineering19(8): 6346–6362.
40.
XuYLWangZLLiGQ, et al. (2019) High-speed running maglev trains interacting with elastic transitional viaducts. Engineering Structures183: 562–578.
41.
YangQSYinJQLiuM, et al. (2024) Post-disaster investigations of damage feature of buildings and structures due to several local strong winds in China during 2021–2024. Advances in Wind Engineering1(2): 100011.
42.
YauJD (2010) Aerodynamic vibrations of a maglev vehicle running on flexible guideways under oncoming wind actions. Journal of Sound and Vibration329(10): 1743–1759.
43.
ZhaiWMHanZLChenZW, et al. (2019) Train–track–bridge dynamic interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Vehicle System Dynamics57(7): 984–1027.
44.
ZhangLLHuangLHZhangZZ (2010) Hopf bifurcation of the maglev time-delay feedback system via pseudo-oscillator analysis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling52(5–6): 667–673.
45.
ZhangLLCampbellSAHuangLH (2011) Nonlinear analysis of a maglev system with time-delayed feedback control. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena240(21): 1761–1770.
46.
ZhangLLZhangZZHuangLH (2012) Double Hopf bifurcation of time-delayed feedback control for maglev system. Nonlinear Dynamics69(3): 961–967.
47.
ZhangLLHuangJHHuangLH, et al. (2015) Stability and bifurcation analysis in a maglev system with multiple delays. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos25(05): 1550074.
48.
ZhangWWWuHZengXH, et al. (2023) Study of chattering suppression for the sliding mode controller of an electromagnetic levitation system. Journal of Vibration and Control29(23–24): 5427–5439.
49.
ZhaoLCuiWFangGS, et al. (2024) State-of-the-art review on typhoon wind environments and their effects on long-span bridges. Advances in Wind Engineering1(1): 100007.
