Rapid advances in the intelligent Internet of Things (IoT) have significantly enhanced sensor technology and edge computing across various monitoring systems. This study focuses on the seamless integration of intelligent IoT with vibration sensor technology and edge computing to effectively detect faults in rotating machinery amidst noisy environments. We introduce an innovative framework for fault diagnosis through cloud-edge collaboration, aimed at broadening the applications of intelligent IoT. Central to our approach is LiteDiagNet, a novel, lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) tailored to identify bearing faults in noise-affected signals. LiteDiagNet features a cutting-edge architecture with base blocks and a distinctive “LiteBlock” that employs multiscale, depth-wise convolutions to significantly improve performance. We evaluated our model’s efficacy against several lightweight networks using public datasets and verified its robustness in real-world scenarios by simulating two types of noise at five different intensity levels. The results demonstrate that LiteDiagNet achieves superior accuracy with fewer parameters and reduced computational demands, thereby enhancing efficiency. This research not only offers a groundbreaking solution for fault diagnosis in rotating machinery but also advances the intelligent and efficient application of industrial IoT technologies.
CaiZShenQ (2023) Falconnet: factorization for the light-weight convnets. In: International conference on neural information processing, Changsha, China, 20–23 November 2023. Springer, 368–380.
2.
CheQHNguyenDPPhamMQ, et al. (2023) Twinlitenet: an efficient and lightweight model for driveable area and lane segmentation in self-driving cars. In: 2023 international conference on multimedia analysis and pattern recognition (MAPR), Quy Nhon, Vietnam, 5-6 October 2023. IEEE, 1–6.
3.
ChenJLinCYaoB, et al. (2023) Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearings with low-quality data: a feature significance and diversity learning method. Reliability Engineering & System Safety237: 109343.
4.
DimitrovNGöçmenT (2022) Virtual sensors for wind turbines with machine learning-based time series models. Wind Energy25(9): 1626–1645.
5.
DuanHCaiZLiuQ, et al. (2024) A multi-source unsupervised fault diagnosis network with residual enhancement attention module for rotating machinery cross-operating conditions. Journal of Vibration and Control. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10775463241280426.
6.
HeCHanPLuJ, et al. (2023) Real-time fault diagnosis of motor bearing via improved cyclostationary analysis implemented onto edge computing system. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement72: 1–11.
7.
HowardASandlerMChuG, et al. (2019) Searching for mobilenetv3. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, Seoul, Korea, 27 October 2019, 1314–1324.
8.
HuHXCaoCHuQ, et al. (2023) A real-time bearing fault diagnosis model based on siamese convolutional autoencoder in industrial internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal11: 3820–3831.
9.
KawalePMishraSKShakyaP (2024) Tffnet: a robust approach with anti-noise and domain shift adaptation for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Journal of Vibration and Control0: (0). Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/10775463241234960.
10.
LiTWangHHeD, et al. (2022a) Blockchain-based privacy-preserving and rewarding private data sharing for iot. IEEE Internet of Things Journal9(16): 15138–15149.
11.
LiTZhouZLiS, et al. (2022b) The emerging graph neural networks for intelligent fault diagnostics and prognostics: a guideline and a benchmark study. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing168: 108653.
12.
LiXWanSLiuS, et al. (2022c) Bearing fault diagnosis method based on attention mechanism and multilayer fusion network. ISA Transactions128: 550–564.
13.
LiWLanHChenJ, et al. (2023) Wavcapsnet: an interpretable intelligent compound fault diagnosis method by backward tracking. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement72: 1–11.
14.
LiDChenJHuangR, et al. (2024) Sensor-aware capsnet: towards trustworthy multisensory fusion for remaining useful life prediction. Journal of Manufacturing Systems72: 26–37.
15.
LiuYJiangHLiuC, et al. (2022) Data-augmented wavelet capsule generative adversarial network for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Knowledge-Based Systems252: 109439.
16.
LuoJWenGLeiZ, et al. (2023) Weak signal enhancement for rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on adaptive optimized vmd and sr under strong noise background. Measurement Science and Technology34(6): 064001.
17.
MaNZhangXZhengHT, et al. (2018) Shufflenet v2: practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), Milan, Italy, 29 September –4 October 2024, 116–131.
18.
MenZLiYTangW, et al. (2024) A new multi-modal time series transformation method and multi-scale convolutional attention network for railway wagon bearing fault diagnosis. Journal of Vibration and Control. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10775463241276024.
19.
MishraRGuptaH (2023) Transforming large-size to lightweight deep neural networks for iot applications. ACM Computing Surveys55(11): 1–35.
20.
NiSJiaPXuY, et al. (2023) Prediction of co concentration in different conditions based on Gaussian-tcn. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical376: 133010.
21.
RandallRBAntoniJ (2011) Rolling element bearing diagnostics—a tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing25(2): 485–520.
22.
RayjadeGBhagureAKusharePB, et al. (2024) Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms and impact of activation functions in artificial neural network classifier for bearing fault diagnosis. Journal of Vibration and Control. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10775463241235778.
23.
SandlerMHowardAZhuM, et al. (2018) Mobilenetv2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In: 2018 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018, 4510–4520.
24.
SisinniESaifullahAHanS, et al. (2018) Industrial internet of things: challenges, opportunities, and directions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics14(11): 4724–4734.
25.
SonYHParkKTLeeD, et al. (2021) Digital twin–based cyber-physical system for automotive body production lines. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology115: 291–310.
26.
SunRShiLYangX, et al. (2020) A coupling diagnosis method of sensors faults in gas turbine control system. Energy205: 117999.
27.
WangDLiYJiaL, et al. (2021) Novel three-stage feature fusion method of multimodal data for bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement70: 1–10.
28.
YuWLiuYDillonT, et al. (2022) Edge computing-assisted iot framework with an autoencoder for fault detection in manufacturing predictive maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics19(4): 5701–5710.
29.
ZhangXZhouXLinM, et al. (2018) Shufflenet: an extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018, 6848–6856.
30.
ZhangYXingKBaiR, et al. (2020) An enhanced convolutional neural network for bearing fault diagnosis based on time–frequency image. Measurement157: 107667.
31.
ZhangJDengCZhengP, et al. (2021) Development of an edge computing-based cyber-physical machine tool. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing67: 102042.
32.
ZhangXKongJZhaoY, et al. (2023a) A deep-learning model with improved capsule networks and lstm filters for bearing fault diagnosis. Signal, Image and Video Processing17(4): 1325–1333.
33.
ZhangYYuKLeiZ, et al. (2023b) Integrated intelligent fault diagnosis approach of offshore wind turbine bearing based on information stream fusion and semi-supervised learning. Expert Systems with Applications232: 120854.
