In this paper, an optimization decision-making method of vehicle fleet queue based on game theory is proposed. By adopting the upper and lower controller structure, the longitudinal motion stability problem of the vehicle fleet is solved. The upper controller utilizes a game control algorithm specially developed for this study. The game payoff function is constructed by considering real-time vehicle information and comprehensively evaluating factors such as expected distance, vehicle safety, and stability. The optimal expected acceleration of the vehicle is determined. Subsequently, the lower controller adjusts the engine throttle opening or brake pressure to regulate the vehicle operation according to the desired acceleration. Simulation results show that the designed game strategy can effectively reduce vehicle spacing and speed errors, thus significantly improving the stability as well as safety of fleet operation.
AnGTalebpourA (2022) Vehicle platooning control for merge coordination: a hybrid ACC-DMPC approach. 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2022: 1611–1616.
2.
BianYZhengYRenW, et al. (2019) Reducing time headway for platooning of connected vehicles via V2V communication. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies102: 87–105.
3.
ChehardoliHGhasemiA (2019) Formation control of longitu- dinal vehicular platoons under generic network topology with heterogeneous time delays. Journal of Vibration and Control25(3): 655–665.
4.
ChenL (2023) The coevolving behavior of games and strategies under different network structures. International Journal of Modern Physics C34(01): 2350006.
5.
ChenRYangZ (2022) A cooperative merging strategy for connected and automated vehicles based on game theory with transferable utility. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems23(10): 19213–19223.
6.
DaiYWangCXieY (2023) Explicitly incorporating surrogate safety measures into connected and automated vehicle longitudinal control objectives for enhancing platoon safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention183: 106975.
7.
EngwerdaJ (2005) LQ Dynamic Optimization and Differential Games. John Wiley & Sons.
8.
EngwerdaJ (2010) Necessary and sufficient conditions for Pareto optimal solutions of cooperative differential games. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization48(6): 3859–3881.
9.
FengYYuSChenH, et al. (2023) Distributed MPC of vehicle platoons with guaranteed consensus and string stability. Scientific Reports13(1): 10396.
10.
GodboleDNLygerosJ (1994) Longitudinal control of the lead car of a platoon. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology43(4): 1125–1135.
11.
GrizzleJWKokotovicPV (1988) Feedback linearization of sampled-data systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control33(9): 857–859.
12.
HuZHuangJYangZ, et al. (2022) Cooperative-game-theoretic optimal robust path tracking control for autonomous vehicles. Journal of Vibration and Control28(5-6): 520–535.
13.
HuMWangXBianY, et al. (2023) Disturbance observer- based cooperative control of vehicle platoons subject to mismatched disturbance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.
14.
KhanMASayedHEMalikS, et al. (2022) Level-5 autonomous driving—are we there yet? A review of research literature. ACM Computing Surveys55(2): 1–38.
15.
LeeSOhCLGLeeG (2021) Impact of automated truck platooning on the performance of freeway mixed traffic flow. Journal of Advanced Transportation2021: 1–13.
16.
LeitmannG (1974) Cooperative and Non-cooperative Many Players Differential Games. Vienna: Springer.
17.
LiHWuHGulatiI, et al. (2022) An improved sliding mode control (SMC) approach for enhancement of communication delay in vehicle platoon system. IET Intelligent Transport Systems16(7): 958–970.
18.
LiuKLiNTsengHE, et al. (2022) Interaction-aware trajectory prediction and planning for autonomous vehicles in forced merge scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems24(1): 474–488.
19.
LiuXYanMYangP, et al. (2023) Observer-based actuator fault detection and robust tolerant control for vehicle platoons. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems21(4): 1175–1186.
20.
LiuYZongCDaiC, et al. (2023) Behavioral decision-making approach for vehicle platoon control: two noncooperative game models. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electri- fication.
21.
MaXZhaoJGongY (2021) Joint scheduling and resource allocation for efficiency-oriented distributed learning over vehicle platooning networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology70(10): 10894–10908.
22.
MengTHuangJChewCM, et al. (2023) Configuration and design schemes of environmental sensing and vehicle computing systems for automated driving: a review. IEEE Sensors Journal.
23.
MeniniLPossieriCTornambeA (2018) Algebraic methods for multiobjective optimal design of control feedbacks for linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control63(12): 4188–4203.
24.
PiDXuePWangW, et al. (2023) Automotive platoon energy- saving: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews179: 113268.
25.
WangPDengHZhangJ, et al. (2021) Model predictive control for connected vehicle platoon under switching communication topology. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems23(7): 7817–7830.
26.
WangWJMaMHLiangSD, et al. (2022) Density waves in an improved car-following model under intelligent transportation system environment. Modern Physics Letters B36(15): 2250014.
27.
WeiHSunQChenJ, et al. (2021) Robust distributed model predictive platooning control for heterogeneous autonomous surface vehicles. Control Engineering Practice107: 104655.
28.
WijnbergenPJeeningaMBesselinkB (2021) Nonlinear spacing policies for vehicle platoons: a geometric approach to decentralized control. Systems & Control Letters153: 104954.
29.
XiaoGYangQYangF, et al. (2022) Level-wise driving knowledge induction for embedded automatic train driving system. Journal of Vibration and Control28(13-14): 1835–1845.
30.
YanMSongJZuoL, et al. (2017) Neural adaptive sliding-mode control of a vehicle platoon using output feedback. Energies10(11): 1906.
31.
YangZHuangJHuZ, et al. (2022) Constraint-oriented integrated longitudinal and lateral robust control for connected and automated vehicle platoons. Journal of Vibration and Control28(5-6): 593–605.
32.
ZadehL (1963) Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control8(1): 59–60.
33.
ZhangYLiuFWangZ, et al. (2022) On nash–stackelberg–nash games under decision-dependent uncertainties: model and equilibrium. Automatica142: 110401.
34.
ZhuPJinSBuX, et al. (2023) Distributed data-driven control for a connected heterogeneous vehicle platoon under quantized and switching topologies communication. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.
