Shunted piezoelectric patches connected to passive electric circuits can be attached to a host structure for effective vibration attenuation. The effect of an auxetic layer to enhance the electromechanical coupling and subsequently the vibration suppression is studied here. Three different configurations are considered for the layer: a classical, a homogeneous auxetic and a layer with microstructure leading to auxetic behavior. First, is presented a modification of the “current-flowing” shunt circuit for multimode vibration control. Two finite element models have been validated, the frequency response graph of the system and the most suitable values of the electric parameters are calculated and a comparison is provided. Furthermore, it is shown that the vibration reduction of the second and third eigenmodes can be enhanced, provided that an auxetic of significant thickness is used. The results demonstrate the effect of the auxetic boosting on vibration suppression.
AldersonAAldersonKL (2007) Auxetic materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering221(4): 565–575.
2.
AvellanedaMSwartPJ (1998) Calculating the performance of 1–3 piezoelectric composites for hydrophone applications: an effective medium approach. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America103(3): 1449–1467.
3.
BehrensSMoheimaniSORFlemingAJ (2003) Multiple mode current flowing passive piezoelectric shunt controller. Journal of Sound and Vibration266(5): 929–942.
4.
ChanNEvansKE (1997) Fabrication methods for auxetic foams. Journal of Materials Science32(22): 5945–5953.
5.
ChenKFangSGaoQ, et al. (2022) Enhancing power output of piezoelectric energy harvesting by gradient auxetic structures. Applied Physics Letters120(10): 103901.
6.
ChenWZhengQLvYA, et al. (2023) Piezoelectric energy harvesting and dissipating behaviors of polymer-based piezoelectric composites for nanogenerators and dampers. Chemical Engineering Journal465: 142755.
7.
ClarkeDJImediegwuCMoatR, et al. (2023) A systematic numerical and experimental study into the mechanical properties of five honeycombs. Composites Part B: Engineering264: 110895.
8.
DarakiM-SMarakakisKStavroulakisGE (2023) Modeling of shunted piezoelectrics and enhancement of vibration suppression through an auxetic interface. Micromachines14(2): 289.
EghbaliPYounesianDFarhangdoustS (2020a) Enhancement of piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting with auxetic boosters. International Journal of Energy Research44(2): 1179–1190.
11.
EghbaliPYounesianDFarhangdoustS (2020b) Enhancement of the low-frequency acoustic energy harvesting with auxetic resonators. Applied Energy270: 115217.
12.
EghbaliPYounesianDMoayedizadehA, et al. (2020c) Study in circular auxetic structures for efficiency enhancement in piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting. Scientific Reports10(1): 16338.
13.
FatahiMHHamediMSafarabadiM (2022) Experimental and numerical implementation of auxetic substrate for enhancing voltage of piezoelectric sandwich beam harvester. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures29(27): 6107–6117.
14.
FergusonWJGKuangYEvansKE, et al. (2018) Auxetic structure for increased power output of strain vibration energy harvester. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical282: 90–96.
15.
FeyTEichhornFHanG, et al. (2016) Mechanical and electrical strain response of a piezoelectric auxetic PZT lattice structure. Smart Materials and Structures25(1): 015017.
16.
GaoQLiaoW-HWangL (2020) On the low-velocity impact responses of auxetic double arrowed honeycomb. Aerospace Science and Technology98: 105698.
17.
GrzybekDKataDMicekP, et al. (2020) Comparative numerical analysis of a piezoelectric harvester based on non-auxetic and auxetic material. In: 2020 21th international carpathian control conference (ICCC), High Tatras, Slovakia, 27 October 2020, 1–5. IEEE. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9257264/ (accessed 27 October 2023).
18.
HuLLLuoZRYinQY (2019) Negative Poisson’s ratio effect of re-entrant anti-trichiral honeycombs under large deformation. Thin-Walled Structures141: 283–292.
19.
JiGZhouJHuberJ (2023) The evaluation of electrical circuits for adjusting sound transmission properties of piezoelectric metamaterials. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing200: 110549.
20.
KaminakisNTStavroulakisGE (2012) Topology optimization for compliant mechanisms, using evolutionary-hybrid algorithms and application to the design of auxetic materials. Composites Part B: Engineering43(6): 2655–2668.
21.
KaminakisNTDrosopoulosGAStavroulakisGE (2015) Design and verification of auxetic microstructures using topology optimization and homogenization. Archive of Applied Mechanics85(9–10): 1289–1306.
22.
KimJHegdeHKimH, et al. (2022) Spindle vibration mitigation utilizing additively manufactured auxetic materials. Journal of Manufacturing Processes73: 633–641.
23.
KoutsianitisPTairidisGKKougkoulosA, et al. (2021a) Parametric investigation of band gap effects in chiral microstructures. Journal of the Serbian Society for Computational Mechanics15(2): 63–78.
24.
KoutsianitisPTairidisGKStavroulakisGE (2021b) Shunted piezoelectric patches on auxetic microstructures for the enhancement of band gaps. Archive of Applied Mechanics91(2): 739–751.
25.
KrishnaswamyJABuroniFCMelnikR, et al. (2020) Design of polymeric auxetic matrices for improved mechanical coupling in lead-free piezocomposites. Smart Materials and Structures29(5): 054002.
26.
KwonKPhanA-V (2015) Symmetric-Galerkin boundary element analysis of the dynamic T-stress for the interaction of a crack with an auxetic inclusion. Mechanics Research Communications69: 91–96.
27.
LiQKuangYZhuM (2017) Auxetic piezoelectric energy harvesters for increased electric power output. AIP Advances7(1): 015104.
28.
MarakakisK (2022) Simulation and Optimization of Smart Structures. PhD dissertation, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece. Available at: https://dias.library.tuc.gr/view/93116 (accessed 3 October 2022).
29.
MarakakisKTairidisGKKoutsianitisP, et al. (2019) Shunt piezoelectric systems for noise and vibration control: a review. Frontiers in Built Environment5: 64.
30.
MarakakisKTairidisGKFoutsitziGA, et al. (2022a) New optimal design of multimode shunt-damping circuits for enhanced vibration control. Signals3(4): 830–856.
31.
MarakakisKTairidisGKFoutsitziGA, et al. (2022b) Optimal multimode control using passive shunt piezoelectric systems. In: 13th HSTAM international congress on mechanics, Patras, Greece, 24–27 August 2022. Available at: https://hstam2022.eap.gr/book-of-proceedings/.
32.
MoayedizadehAYounesianD (2022) Application of the meta-substrates for power amplification in rotary piezoelectric energy harvesting systems: design, fabrication and testing. Energy Reports8: 5653–5667.
33.
MohamedSMChakrabortyA (2020) Optimal location of piezoelectric patch in passive vibration control. In: DuttaSInanEDwivedySK (eds) Advances in Rotor Dynamics, Control, and Structural Health Monitoring. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Singapore: Springer, 579–591. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-5693-7_40 (accessed 26 October 2023).
34.
MoheimaniSORFlemingAJ (eds) (2006) Dealing with hysteresis. In: Piezoelectric Transducers for Vibration Control and Damping. Advances in Industrial Control. London, UK: Springer, 203–227. DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-332-9_11 (accessed 17 November 2023).
NguyenDDPhamCH (2018) Nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of sandwich composite plates with negative Poisson’s ratio in auxetic honeycombs. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials20(6): 692–717.
37.
OguntosinVOgbechiePT (2023) Design and construction of a foam-based piezoelectric energy harvester. E-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy4: 100175.
38.
PanKZhangWDingJ (2022) Negative Poisson’s ratio re-entrant base modeling and vibration isolation performance analysis. Symmetry14(7): 1356.
39.
ScarpaFTomlinsonG (2000) Theoretical characteristics of the vibration of sandwich plates with in-plane negative Poisson’s ratio values. Journal of Sound and Vibration230(1): 45–67.
40.
SebaqMHLiuZ (2024) Energy absorption and vibration mitigation performances of novel 2D auxetic metamaterials. International Journal of Computational Materials Science and Engineering13(02): 2350022.
41.
ShenJSunWXuK (2023) Semi-analytical dynamic modeling and vibration reduction analysis of the blisk structure with piezoelectric shunt damping patches. Applied Acoustics211: 109502.
42.
StavroulakisGE (2005) Auxetic behaviour: appearance and engineering applications. Physica Status Solidi (B)242(3): 710–720.
43.
TabakASafaeiBMemarzadehA, et al. (2023) An extensive review of piezoelectric energy-harvesting structures utilizing auxetic materials. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies12: 3155–3192. DOI: 10.1007/s42417-023-01038-9.
44.
TanakaHAsaoSShibutaniY (2021) Auxetic vibration behaviours of periodic tetrahedral units with a shared edge. Royal Society Open Science8(10): 210768.
45.
TheocarisPSStavroulakisGEPanagiotopoulosPD (1997) Negative Poisson’s ratios in composites with star-shaped inclusions: a numerical homogenization approach. Archive of Applied Mechanics67(4): 274–286.
46.
ThomasODeüJ-FDucarneJ (2009) Vibrations of an elastic structure with shunted piezoelectric patches: efficient finite element formulation and electromechanical coupling coefficients. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering80(2): 235–268.
TürkoğluİKKasımHYazıcıM (2023) Experimental investigation of 3D-printed auxetic core sandwich structures under quasi-static and dynamic compression and bending loads. International Journal of Protective Structures14(1): 63–86.
49.
WuTChenTYanH, et al. (2023) Modeling analysis and tuning of shunt piezoelectric damping controller for structural vibration. Acta Mechanica234(9): 4407–4426.
50.
XuNLiuH-TAnM-R, et al. (2021) Novel 2D star-shaped honeycombs with enhanced effective Young’s modulus and negative Poisson’s ratio. Extreme Mechanics Letters43: 101164.
51.
ZhangX-WYangD-Q (2016) Numerical and experimental studies of a light-weight auxetic cellular vibration isolation base. Shock and Vibration2016(9): 1–16.
52.
ZhaoGFanYTangC, et al. (2024) Preparation and compressive properties of cementitious composites reinforced by 3D printed cellular structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Developments in the Built Environment17: 100362.
