Rigorous model-based design and semi-active control for hydro-pneumatic suspension (HPS) of the mining dump truck play an important role in providing superior driving characteristics such as ride comfort. In this paper, the investigation is carried out on a new control algorithm of semi-active suspension systems, namely, back propagation-active disturbance rejection control (BP-ADRC), supporting the driving characteristic ride comfort, and the technique is adopted in accordance with the co-simulation of MATLAB/Simulink and ADAMS. Besides, the model and controller used in the study including the semi-active HPS model, multi-body dynamic model, three-dimensional road model, and BP-ADRC controller are described and the vehicle response results are discussed which are obtained at the velocity of 20, 30, and 40 km/h on the time ranging from 10 s to 50 s, respectively. The results show that compared to passive HPS, both ADRC and BP-ADRC semi-active HPS are able to reduce vibration acceleration significantly, of which BP-ADRC reduces more. The maximum reduction rates of the semi-active HPS can reach 20.27% and 18.81% under random and impulsive excitation, respectively. The data illustrate that the semi-active HPS based on BP-ADRC control can significantly improve the ride comfort of the mining dump truck.
Ab TalibMHMat DarusIZMohd SaminP, et al. (2021) Vibration control of semi-active suspension system using PID controller with advanced firefly algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing12(1): 1119–1137.
2.
AbdiBMirzaeiMMojed GharamalekiR (2018) A new approach to optimal control of nonlinear vehicle suspension system with input constraint. Journal of Vibration and Control24(15): 3307–3320.
3.
DangorMDahunsiOAPedroJO, et al. (2014) Evolutionary algorithm-based PID controller tuning for nonlinear quarter-car electrohydraulic vehicle suspensions. Nonlinear Dynamics78(4): 2795–2810.
4.
DemirOKeskinICetinS (2012) Modeling and control of a nonlinear half-vehicle suspension system: a hybrid fuzzy logic approach. Nonlinear Dynamics67(3): 2139–2151.
5.
EkoruJEDDahunsiOAPedroJO (2011) PID control of a nonlinear half-car active suspension system via force feedback. IEEE Africon2011: 6071979.
6.
GadSMeteredHBassuinyA, et al. (2017) Multi-objective genetic algorithm fractional-order PID controller for semi-active magnetorheologically damped seat suspension. Journal of Vibration and Control23(8): 1248–1266.
7.
GaoZQHuangYHanJQ (2001) An alternative paradigm for control system design. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, FL, USA, 04–07 December 2001, Vols. 1–5, PP. 4578–4585.
8.
GoforthFJZhengQGaoZQ (2012) A novel practical control approach for rate independent hysteretic systems. ISA Transactions51(3): 477–484.
9.
GuoDLHuHYYiJQ (2004) Neural network control for a semi-active vehicle suspension with a magnetorheological damper. Journal of Vibration and Control10(3): 461–471.
10.
GuruguntlaVLalM (2023) Multi-body modelling and ride comfort analysis of a seated occupant under whole-body vibration. Journal of Vibration and Control29(13–14): 3078–3095.
11.
HanJQ (2008) Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC): control technique for estimating and compensating uncertainties: the technique for estimating and. In: Compensating the Uncertainties. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press.
12.
HanJQ (2009) From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(3): 900–906.
13.
HuKZhangWY (2022) Position control algorithm of fuzzy adaptive PID of hydraulic interconnected suspension under load impact disturbance. IEEE Access10: 39665–39673.
14.
HuYLChenMZQShuZ (2014) Passive vehicle suspensions employing inerters with multiple performance requirements. Journal of Sound and Vibration333(8): 2212–2225.
15.
HuangCZGaoZQ (2013) On transfer function representation and frequency response of linear active disturbance rejection control. In: 2013 32nd Chinese Control Conference (Ccc), Xi’an, China, 26–28 July 2013, pp. 72–77.
16.
LiPSLamJCheungKC (2018) Motion-based active disturbance rejection control for a non-linear full-car suspension system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering232(5): 616–631.
17.
LiRHYangFLinDZ (2022) Design, experimental modeling and analysis of compact double-gas-chamber hydro-pneumatic strut. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing172: 109015.
18.
MohammadikiaRAliasgharyM (2019) Design of an interval type-2 fractional order fuzzy controller for a tractor active suspension system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture167: 105049.
19.
MuhammedAYazanDGavrilovA (2022) Reference governed ADRC approach to manage the handling-comfort contradiction in a full-vehicle suspension. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control44(14): 2693–2708.
20.
ParkashASwarupA (2023) Application of asymmetric barrier Lyapunov function using ADRC approach for development of autonomous vehicle lateral control. Journal of Vibration and Control29(9–10): 2160–2171.
21.
TheronNJElsPS (2007) Modelling of a semi-active hydropneumatic spring-damper unit. International Journal of Vehicle Design45(4): 501–521.
22.
TrikandeMKarveNAnand RajR, et al. (2016) Semi-active vibration control of an 8x8 armored wheeled platform. Journal of Vibration and Control24(2): 283–302.
23.
WangQSZengJWuY, et al. (2020) Study on semi-active suspension applied on carbody underneath suspended system of high-speed railway vehicle. Journal of Vibration and Control26(9-10): 671–679.
24.
XiaoWQLuDJSongLM, et al. (2020) Influence of particle damping on ride comfort of mining dump truck. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing136: 106509.
25.
YanYYDongLLHanY, et al. (2022) A general inverse control model of a magneto-rheological damper based on neural network. Journal of Vibration and Control28(7–8): 952–963.
26.
YangLWangRCDingRK, et al. (2021a) Investigation on the dynamic performance of a new semi-active hydro-pneumatic inerter-based suspension system with MPC control strategy. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing154: 107569.
27.
YangZBLuCLSunXD, et al. (2021b) Study on active disturbance rejection control of a bearingless induction motor based on an improved particle swarm optimization-genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification7(2): 694–705.
28.
YinYMRakhejaSYangJ, et al. (2018) Characterization of a hydro-pneumatic suspension strut with gas-oil emulsion. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing106: 319–333.
29.
ZhangSGuZQWuWG, et al. (2020) Transient numerical investigation of a large-scale hydro-pneumatic suspension considering variations in check valve parameters and operational conditions. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow30(4): 1967–1990.
30.
ZhuJXZhaoDXLiuS, et al. (2022) Integrated control of spray system and active suspension systems based on model-assisted active disturbance rejection control algorithm. Mathematics10(18): 3391.
