The paper proposes a motion control framework for the unmanned wheel-legged hybrid vehicle to track the motion trajectory considering uncertain disturbances. The whole-body dynamic model is built with the contact force of each rolling wheel, which serves as the foundation to obtain trajectory tracking. The angular momentum and linear momentum are optimized by the robust model predictive control algorithm considering the soft constraint of the relaxation variable. The contact force between wheel and ground is solved by the quadratic programming algorithm to efficiently obtain the flexion/extension joint and wheel motion planning. Then, the explicit algorithm to calculate the torque commands of the flexion/extension joint considering the feed-forward torque and feedback torque to improve the control accuracy. Simulation results validate that the control framework based on the robust model predictive control algorithm can solve the uncertain disturbances in process of the vehicle running on the rough road.
AbdallahCDawsonDMDoratoP, et al. (1991) Survey of robust control for rigid robots. IEEE Control Systems Magazine11(2): 24–30.
2.
BjelonicMBellicosoCDde ViraghY, et al. (2019) Keep Rollin’—whole-body motion control and planning for wheeled quadrupedal robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4(2): 2116–2123.
3.
BjelonicMSankarPKBellicosoCD, et al. (2020) Rolling in the deep – hybrid locomotion for wheeled-legged robots using online trajectory optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2): 3626–3633.
4.
CalandraRIvaldiSDeisenrothMP, et al. (2015) Learning inverse dynamics models with contacts. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, 26–30 May 2015, pp. 3186–3191.
5.
DuWBenamarF (2020) A compact form dynamics controller for a high-DOF tetrapod-on-wheel robot with one manipulator via null space based convex optimization and compatible impedance controllers. Multibody System Dynamics49(4): 447-463.
6.
DuWQFnadiMBenamarF (2020) Rolling based locomotion on rough terrain for a wheeled quadruped using centroidal dynamics. Mechanism and Machine Theory153: 103984.
7.
EnglsbergerJMesesanGOttC (2017) Smooth trajectory generation and push-recovery based on divergent component of motion. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, 2017, Vancouver, BC, 24–28 September 2017, pp. 4560–4567.
8.
FnadiMAlexandre dit SandrettoJ (2021) Experimental validation of a guaranteed nonlinear model predictive control. Algorithms14(8): 248.
9.
FnadiMPlumetFBenamarF (2019) Model predictive control based dynamic path tracking of a four-wheel steering mobile robot. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China, 03–08 November 2019, pp. 4518–4523.
10.
FocchiMOrsolinoRCamurriM, et al. (2020) Heuristic planning for rough terrain locomotion in presence of external disturbances and variable perception Quality. In: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 132, pp. 165–209.
11.
HeJGaoF (2020) Mechanism, actuation, perception, and control of highly dynamic multilegged robots: a Review(in English). Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English edition)33(1): Art. no. 79.
12.
HelwaMKHeinsASchoelligAP (2019) Provably robust learning-based approach for high-accuracy tracking control of Lagrangian systems. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4(2): 1587–1594.
13.
HutterGehringCHopflingerMA, et al. (2014) Toward combining speed, efficiency, versatility, and robustness in an autonomous quadruped. IEEE Transactions on Robotics30(6): 1427–1440.
14.
KatzB (2018) A Low Cost Modular Actuator For Dynamic Robots. Master's Thesis. Boston, MA: MIT.
15.
LiuHLiuBHanZ, et al. (2021) Attitude control strategy for unmanned wheel-legged hybrid vehicles considering the contact of the wheels and ground. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering0(0): 09544070211058382.
16.
MayneDQ (2014) Model predictive control: Recent developments and future promise. Automatica50(12): 2967–2986.
17.
NiLMaFWuL (2020) Posture Control of a Four-Wheel-Legged Robot with a Suspension System(in English). IEEE Access8: 152790–152804. Art. no. 9170525.
18.
PolydorosASNalpantidisLKrügerV (2015) Real-time deep learning of robotic manipulator inverse dynamics. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 28 September 2015–02 October 2015, pp. 3442–3448.
19.
QinYZhaoZWangZ, et al. (2021) Study of longitudinal–vertical dynamics for in-wheel motor-driven electric vehicles. Automotive Innovation4(2): 227–237.
20.
StephensBJ (2011) State estimation for force-controlled humanoid balance using simple models in the presence of modeling error. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, 09–13 May 2011, pp. 3994–3999.
21.
Sun de la CruzJ (2011) Learning inverse dynamics for robot manipulator control. Doctoral’s Dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo.
22.
SunZXiaYDaiL, et al. (2017) Disturbance rejection MPC for tracking of wheeled mobile robot. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics22(6): 2576–2587.
23.
XinYRongXLiY, et al. (2019) Movements and balance control of a wheel-leg robot based on uncertainty and disturbance estimation method. IEEE Access7: 133265–133273.
24.
ZhouSHelwaMKSchoelligAP (2017) Design of deep neural networks as add-on blocks for improving impromptu trajectory tracking. In: 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Melbourne, Australia, December 12–15, 2017, pp. 5201–5207.
