This study introduces a modified near-time–optimal rigid-body command that represents the fastest possible command profile based on using the full input capabilities of the system, considering rest-to-rest motion. The control objective is to have the shortest maneuvering time suitable for handling insensitive payloads. The rest-to-rest motion is divided into three stages. The first stage includes a quick response with maximum trolley acceleration. The second stage involves cruising at the maximum trolley velocity. The third stage provides deceleration, where both zero vibration and the zero vibration derivative are applied. The proposed shaper is simulated numerically for testing its performance. The theoretical findings were validated experimentally using a prototype crane. This study’s major finding demonstrates that the new technique succeeded in reducing the maneuvering time with zero vibration at the end of the motion. Moreover, the results show the insensitivity of the proposed shaper to variations in system parameters using a zero vibration derivative shaper.
AlhazzaKA (2017) Adjustable maneuvering time wave-form command shaping control with variable hoisting speeds. Journal of Vibration and Control23: 1095–1105.
2.
AlhazzaKAHasanAMAlghanimKA, et al. (2014) An iterative learning control technique for point-to-point maneuvers applied on an overhead crane. Shock and Vibration2014: 1–11
3.
AlhazzaKAMasoudZ (2010) A novel wave-form command shaper for overhead cranes. In: ASME 2010 dynamic systems and control conference, Cambridge, MA, 12–15 September, pp. 331–336.
4.
AlhazzaKAMasoudZN (2016) Waveform command shaping control of multimode systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration363: 126–140.
5.
AlhazzaKAMasoudZNAlotaibiN (2013) A smooth wave-form command shaping control. In: ASME 2013 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Portland, OR, 4–7 August 2013, paper no. V008T13A082. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
6.
ChoS-KLeeH-H (2000) An anti-swing control of a 3-dimensional overhead crane. In: Proceedings of the 2000 American control conference. ACC (IEEE cat. no.00CH36334), Chicago, IL, 28–30 June 2000, pp. 1037–1041. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
7.
ChoS-KLeeH-H (2002) A fuzzy-logic antiswing controller for three-dimensional overhead cranes. ISA Transactions41: 235–243.
8.
DuongSCUezatoEKinjoH, et al. (2012) A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for recurrent neural network control of a three-dimensional tower crane. Automation in Construction23: 55–63.
9.
FangYMaBWangP, et al. (2011) A motion planning-based adaptive control method for an underactuated crane system. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology20(1): 241–248.
10.
GarridoSAbderrahimMGimenezA, et al. (2008) Anti-swinging input shaping control of an automatic construction crane. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering5: 549–557.
11.
HuhC-DHongK-S (2002) Input shaping control of container crane systems: limiting the transient sway angle. IFAC Proceedings Volumes35: 445–450.
12.
KhalidAHueyJSinghoseW, et al. (2006) Human operator performance testing using an input-shaped bridge crane. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control128: 835–841.
13.
LauMAPaoLY (2001) Comparison of input shaping and time-optimal control of flexible structures. In: Proceedings of the 2001 American control conference (cat. no. 01CH37148), Arlington, VA, 25–27 June 2001, pp. 1485–1490. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
14.
LiXYuW (2012) Anti-swing control for an overhead crane with fuzzy compensation. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing18: 1–11.
15.
MaBFangYZhangX (2008) Adaptive tracking control for an overhead crane system. IFAC Proceedings Volumes41: 12194–12199.
16.
MasoudZNDaqaqMF (2006) A graphical approach to input-shaping control design for container cranes with hoist. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology14: 1070–1077.
17.
MoghadamDESpeckJGrossmannS, et al. (2018) Voltage distribution in the stator windings of high voltage motors fed by PWM drives part I: effects of the pulse characteristics. In: 2018 IEEE 2nd international conference on dielectrics (ICD), Budapest, Hungary, 1–5 July 2018, pp. 1–4. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
18.
MohammedAAlghanimKAndaniMT (2019) An optimized non-linear input shaper for payload oscillation suppression of crane point-to-point maneuvers. International Journal of Dynamics and Control7: 567–576.
19.
NarangAGuptaBKDickEP, et al. (1989) Measurement and analysis of surge distribution in motor stator windings. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion4: 126–134.
20.
OsmanajSSimnica AliuKLimaniM, et al. (2018) The sensitivity of the hoist system in crane applications from speed control methods at induction motor. E & I Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik135: 195–203.
21.
OuyangHHuJZhangG, et al. (2019) Sliding-mode-based trajectory tracking and load sway suppression control for double-pendulum overhead cranes. IEEE Access7: 4371–4379.
22.
ParkB-JHongK-SHuhC-D (2000) Time-efficient input shaping control of container crane systems. In: Proceedings of the 2000. IEEE international conference on control applications. Conference proceedings (cat. no.00CH37162), Anchorage, AK, 27–27 September 2000, pp. 80–85. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
23.
ParkerGGPettersonBDohrmannCR, et al. (1995) Vibration suppression of fixed-time jib crane maneuvers. In: Smart structures and materials 1995: industrial and commercial applications of smart structures technologies, San Diego, CA, 2–3 March, pp. 131–140. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
24.
RamliLMohamedZAbdullahiAM, et al. (2017) Control strategies for crane systems: a comprehensive review. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing95: 1–23.
25.
RongBRuiXTaoL, et al. (2018) Dynamics analysis and fuzzy anti-swing control design of overhead crane system based on Riccati discrete time transfer matrix method. Multibody System Dynamics43: 279–295.
26.
SingerNCSeeringWPPaschKA (1990) Shaping command inputs to minimize unwanted dynamics. US4916635.
27.
SinghT (2004) Jerk limited input shapers. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control126: 215–219.
28.
SinghTSinghoseW (2002) Tutorial on input shaping/time delay control of maneuvering flexible structures. In: Proceedings of the 2002 American control conference (IEEE cat. no. CH37301), Anchorage, AK, 8–10 May 2002, pp. 1717–1731. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
29.
SinghoseW (2009) Command shaping for flexible systems: a review of the first 50 years. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing10: 153–168.
30.
SinghoseWEloundouRLawrenceJ (2010) Command generation for flexible systems by input shaping and command smoothing. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics33: 1697–1707.
31.
SinghoseWKozakKRobertsonM (2006) Computational framework for digital input shapers using linear optimisation. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications153: 314–322.
32.
SinghoseWPaoLSeeringW (1996) Time-optimal rest-to-rest slewing of multi-mode flexible spacecraft using ZVD robustness constraints. In: Guidance, navigation, and control conference, San Diego, CA, 29–31 July 1996. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
33.
SinghoseWPorterLKenisonM, et al. (2000) Effects of hoisting on the input shaping control of gantry cranes. Control Engineering Practice8: 1159–1165.
34.
SinghoseWESingerNCDerezinskiSJIII, et al. (1997) Method and apparatus for minimizing unwanted dynamics in a physical system. US5638267.
35.
SmithOJM (1957) Posicast control of damped oscillatory systems. Proceedings of the IRE45(9): 1249–1255.
36.
SunNYangTChenH, et al. (2019) Adaptive anti-swing and positioning control for 4-DOF rotary cranes subject to uncertain/unknown parameters with hardware experiments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems49: 1309–1321.
37.
SungY-GSinghoseWE (2009) Limited-state commands for systems with two flexible modes. Mechatronics19: 780–787.
38.
ToxquiRYuWLiX (2006) Anti-swing control for overhead crane with neural compensation. In: The 2006 IEEE international joint conference on neural network proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 16–21 July 2006, pp. 4697–4703. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
39.
TuanLAMoonS-CLeeWG, et al. (2013) Adaptive sliding mode control of overhead cranes with varying cable length. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology27: 885–893.
40.
VaughanJMalekiESinghoseW (2010) Advantages of using command shaping over feedback for crane control. In: Proceedings of the 2010 American control conference, Baltimore, MD, 30 June–2 July 2010, pp. 2308–2313. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
41.
VaughanJYanoASinghoseW (2008) Comparison of robust input shapers. Journal of Sound and Vibration315: 797–815.
42.
YangTSunNChenH, et al. (2020) Neural network-based adaptive antiswing control of an underactuated ship-mounted crane with roll motions and input dead zones. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems31: 901–914.
43.
ZaborszkyJ (1958) A simple nonlinearized control system. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part II: Applications and Industry77: 430–436.
44.
ZhouMSunNChenH, et al. (2017a) A novel sliding mode control method for underactuated overhead cranes. In: 2017 Chinese automation congress (CAC), Jinan, China, 20–22 October 2017, pp. 4548–4552. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
45.
ZhouQWuCShiP (2017b) Observer-based adaptive fuzzy tracking control of nonlinear systems with time delay and input saturation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 316: 49–68.
