In this study, we considered the coordination and vibration control for two sets of flexible satellite systems with input constraints and actuator failures. The parameters of both systems were kept uniform, and one was called the master flexible satellite, and the other one was called slave flexible satellite. The two sets of the flexible satellite systems were modelled as partial differential equations. Coordination control laws were designed to turn the master flexible satellite system to the desired angle and then turn the slave system to the angle of the master satellite system. Furthermore, the hyperbolic tangent function was adopted to realize the control input constraint. The adaptive control laws were designed to ensure that the systems work normally even when the actuator fails. Lyapunov’s direct method was adopted and stability analysis was given. Finally, numerical simulations were conducted to validate the results.
AghiliF (2009) Coordination control of a free-flying manipulator and its base attitude to capture and detumble a noncooperative satellite. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, St. Louis, MO, 10–15 October 2009, pp. 2365–2372. IEEE.
2.
CaoFLiuJ (2019a) Adaptive neural network control of an arm-string system with actuator fault based on a pde model. Journal of Vibration and Control25(1): 172–181.
3.
CaoFLiuJ (2019b) Boundary vibration control for a two-link rigid–flexible manipulator with quantized input. Journal of Vibration and Control25(23–24): 2935–2945.
4.
CoubleYRosenbergCChaputE, et al. (2018) Two-color scheme for a multi-beam satellite return link: impact of interference coordination. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications36(5): 993–1003.
5.
FuJLiuMLiH, et al. (2019) Coordinated attitude control for synthetic aperture radar satellites with quantization and communication delay. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems17(7): 1770–1780.
6.
GuoYSongS-MLiX-H (2016) Finite-time output feedback attitude coordination control for formation flying spacecraft without unwinding. Acta Astronautica122: 159–174.
7.
HeWMengT,HeX, et al. (2018a) Iterative learning control for a flapping wing micro aerial vehicle under distributed disturbances. IEEE transactions on cybernetics49(4): 1524–1535.
8.
HeWMengTHeX, et al. (2018b) Unified iterative learning control for flexible structures with input constraints. Automatica96: 326–336.
9.
HeWMengTHuangD, et al. (2017) Adaptive boundary iterative learning control for an Euler–Bernoulli beam system with input constraint. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems29(5): 1539–1549.
10.
HeWZhangS (2016) Control design for nonlinear flexible wings of a robotic aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology25(1): 351–357.
11.
HuangXYanYZhouY, et al. (2017) Dual-quaternion based distributed coordination control of six-DOF spacecraft formation with collision avoidance. Aerospace Science and Technology67: 443–455.
12.
JiNLiuJ (2018) Vibration control for a flexible satellite with input constraint based on nussbaum function via backstepping method. Aerospace Science and Technology77: 563–572.
13.
JiNLiuZLiuJ, et al. (2018) Vibration control for a nonlinear three-dimensional Euler–Bernoulli beam under input magnitude and rate constraints. Nonlinear Dynamics91(4): 2551–2570.
14.
JiangTLiuJHeW (2016) Boundary control for a flexible manipulator with a robust state observer. Journal of Vibration and Control24(2): 260–271.
15.
LiuYFuYHeW, et al. (2018) Modeling and observer-based vibration control of a flexible spacecraft with external disturbances. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics66(11): 8648–8658.
16.
LiuZLiuJHeW (2017) Modeling and vibration control of a flexible aerial refueling hose with variable lengths and input constraint. Automatica77: 302–310.
17.
LiuZZhaoZAhnCK (2020) Boundary constrained control of flexible string systems subject to disturbances. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs67(1): 112–116.
18.
MengTHeWYangH, et al. (2016) Vibration control for a flexible satellite system with output constraints. Nonlinear Dynamics85(4): 2673–2686.
19.
WangHShenX-HZhangL-X, et al. (2012) Active vibration suppression of flexible structure using a LMI-based control patch. Journal of Vibration and Control18(9): 1375–1379.
20.
XiaYZhangJLuK, et al. (2019) Coordination control design for formation reconfiguration of multiple spacecraft. In: Finite Time and Cooperative Control of Flight Vehicles. Singapore: Springer, 325–345.
21.
ZhaoZLiuYLuoF, et al. (2016) Adaptive boundary control of an axially moving belt system with high acceleration/deceleration. IET Control Theory & Applications10(11): 1299–1306.
22.
ZhuZGuoYZhongC (2018) Distributed attitude coordination tracking control for spacecraft formation with time-varying delays. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(6): 2082–2087.
23.
ZouA-Mde RuiterAHJKumarKD (2016) Distributed finite-time velocity-free attitude coordination control for spacecraft formations. Automatica67: 46–53.
24.
ZouA-MKumarKD (2012) Robust attitude coordination control for spacecraft formation flying under actuator failures. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics35(4): 1247–1255.
