We exploit a Fourier method to inverse engineer fast load transport protocols for an overhead crane, which is robust with respect to the deviation of cable length, corresponding to an ideal value. In the small oscillations regime, the protocols guarantee final adiabatic energies, i.e. null excitation with respect to the initial energy, regardless of the initial conditions. We demonstrate with calculations for the exact dynamics the stability of this result.
Abdel-RahmanEM,NayfehAHMasoudZN (2003) Dynamics and control of cranes: a review. Journal of Vibration and Control9: 863–908.
2.
ChenX,RuschhauptA,SchmidtS, et al. (2010) Fast optimal frictionless atom cooling in harmonic traps: shortcut to adiabaticity. Physical Review Letters104: 063002.
3.
DeffnerS,JarzynskiCdel CampoA (2014) Classical and quantum shortcuts to adiabaticity for scale-invariant driving. Physical Review X4: 021013.
4.
FliessM,LévineJRouchonP (1993) Generalized state variable representation for a simplified crane description. International Journal of Control58: 277–283.
5.
González-ResinesS,Guéry-OdelinD,TobalinaA, et al. (2017) Invariant-based inverse engineering of crane control parameters. Physical Review Applied8: 054008.
6.
Guéry-OdelinDMugaJG (2014) Transport in a harmonic trap: shortcuts to adiabaticity and robust protocols. Physical Review A90: 063425.
7.
Guéry-OdelinD,MugaJG,Ruiz-MonteroMJ, et al. (2014) Nonequilibrium solutions of the Boltzmann equation under the action of an external force. Physical Review Letters112: 180602.
8.
JarzynskiC (2013) Generating shortcuts to adiabaticity in quantum and classical dynamics. Physical Review A88: 040101(R).
9.
JarzynskiC,DeffnerS,PatraA, et al. (2017) Fast forward to the classical adiabatic invariant. Physical Review E95: 032122.
10.
KangSCMirandaE (2004) Physics Based Model for Simulating the Dynamics of Tower Cranes. In: Proceeding of Xth international conference on computing in civil and building engineering (ICCCBE), Weimar, Germany, 2–4 June 2004.
11.
Keum-ShikHHameedU (2019) Dynamics and Control of Industrial Cranes. New York: Springer, 35–39.
12.
KlaassensJB,SmidGE,van Nauta LemkeHR, et al. (2000) Modeling and Control of Container Cranes. Proceedings. London: Cargo Systems, 1–17.
13.
KuoT-YTKangS-CJ (2014) Control of fast crane operation. Automation in Construction42: 25–35.
14.
LiuH-SChengW-M (2016) The motion planning of overhead crane based on suppressing payload residual swing. MATEC Web of Conferences40: 02001.
15.
OkuyamaMTakahashiK (2017) Quantum classical correspondence of STA. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan86: 043002.
16.
PatraAJarzynskiC (2017) Classical and quantum shortcuts to adiabaticity in a tilted piston. Journal of Physical Chemistry B121: 3403–3411.
17.
RuschhauptA,ChenX,AlonsoD, et al. (2012) Optimally robust shortcuts to population inversion in two-level quantum systems. New Journal of Physics14: 093040.
18.
SinghoseW (2009) Command shaping for flexible systems: a review of the first 50 years. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing10(4): 153–168.
19.
TorronteguiE,IbáñezS,Martínez-GaraotS, et al. (2013) Shortcuts to adiabaticity. Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics62: 117–169.
20.
TorronteguiE,LizuainI,González-ResinesS, et al. (2017) Energy consumption for shortcuts to adiabaticity. Physical Review A96: 022133.
21.
WuZXiaX (2014) Optimal motion planning for overhead cranes. IET Control Theory & Applications8: 1833–1842.
22.
ZhangM,MaX,RongX, et al. (2017) Error tracking control for underactuated overhead cranes against arbitrary initial payload swing angles. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing84: 268–285.
23.
ZhangQ,ChenXGuéry-OdelinD (2015) Fast and optimal transport of atoms with anharmonic traps. Physical Review A92: 043410.
