The attitude maneuver dynamics and control strategy for a fuel-filled spacecraft with uncertain inertia and external disturbances are studied. The mathematical model of a three-axis stabilized spacecraft is established based on the law of conservation of momentum, and the liquid fuel inside the partially-filled fuel tank is represented by an equivalent two-mode spring-mass model. The adaptive sliding mode control law is designed for this kind of underactuated system, and the Lyapunov stability analysis guarantees that all system trajectories reach and remain on the sliding surface. Then, the multiple mode input shapers are used to suppress the sloshing of the fluid fuel. The numerical results show good performance and effectiveness of the control strategy.
Aboel-HassanAArafaMNassefA (2009) Design and optimization of input shapers for liquid slosh suppression. Journal of Sound and Vibration320(1–2): 1–15.
2.
Abramson HN (ed.) (1966) The Dynamic Behavior of Liquids in Moving Containers: With Applications to Space Vehicle Technology. NASA Technical Report SP-106.
3.
DengMLYueBZ (2017a) Attitude tracking control of flexible spacecraft with large amplitude slosh. Acta Mechanica Sinica33(6): 1095–1102.
4.
DengMLYueBZYuJR (2017b) Position and attitude control of spacecraft with large amplitude propellant slosh and depletion. Journal of Aerospace Engineering20(6): 07501–07512.
5.
Dodge FT (2000) The New Dynamic Behavior of Liquid in Moving Containers. San Antonio TX: Southwest Research Institute.
6.
DongKQiNMWangZet al.(2009) Dynamic influence of propellant sloshing estimation using hybrid: mechanical analogy and CFD. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences52(177): 144–151.
7.
Feddema J, Dohrmann C, Parker G, et al. (1996) Robotically controlled slosh-free motion of an open container of liquid. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 22–28 April 1996, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp.596–602.
8.
Feddema J, Dohrmann C, Parker G, et al. (1997a) A comparison of maneuver optimization and input shaping filters for robotically controlled slosh-free motion of an open container of liquid. In: Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference, 6 June 1997, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp.1345–1349.
9.
FeddemaJDohrmannCParkerGet al.(1997b) Control for slosh-free motion of an open container. IEEE Control Systems17(1): 29–36.
10.
Feddema J, Dohrmann C, Robinett R, et al. (1997c) Controlled Slosh-Free Motion of an Open Container of Liquid. Presented at: 35th AIAA Aerosciences Meeting and Exhibit, Symposium on Nonlinear Dynamics, Reno, Nevada, USA, 6–9 January 1997.
11.
HaghighiRPangCK (2018) Robust concurrent attitude-position control of a swarm of underactuated nanosatellites. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology26(1): 77–88.
12.
HuQL (2009) Robust adaptive sliding mode attitude maneuvering and vibration damping of three-axis-stabilized flexible spacecraft with actuator saturation limits. Nonlinear Dynamics55(4): 301–321.
13.
HuQMaGXieL (2008) Robust and adaptive variable structure output feedback control of uncertain systems with input nonlinearity. Automatica44(2): 552–559.
14.
HuangYJiaY (2018) Distributed finite-time output feedback synchronisation control for six DOF spacecraft formation subject to input saturation. IET Control Theory & Applications12(4): 532–542.
15.
KanaDD (1987) A model for nonlinear rotary slosh in propellant tanks. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets24(2): 169–177.
16.
KanaDD (1989) Validated spherical pendulum model for rotary liquid slosh. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets26(3): 188–195.
17.
Morgenstern WM, Bourkland KL, Hsu OC, et al. (2011) Solar Dynamics Observatory Guidance, Navigation, and Control System Overview. NASA Technical Report 2011-6726.
18.
Ooten E and Singhose W (2000) Command Generation with Sliding Mode Control for Flexible Systems. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 30 March–1 April 2000, Nagoya, Japan. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp.64–68.
19.
PaiMC (2011) Robust input shaping control for multi-mode flexible structures. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems9(1): 23–31.
20.
PaiMC (2012) Robust input shaping control for multi-mode flexible structures using neuro-sliding mode output feedback control. Journal of the Franklin Institute349(3): 1283–1303.
21.
PridgenBBaiKSinghoseW (2013) Shaping container motion for multi-mode and robust slosh suppression. AIAA Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets50(2): 440–448.
22.
ReyhanogluMHervasJR (2012) Nonlinear dynamics and control of space vehicles with multiple fuel slosh modes. Control Engineering Practice20(9): 912–918.
23.
ReyhanogluMHervasJR (2013) Robotically controlled sloshing suppression in point-to-point liquid container transfer. Journal of Vibration and Control19(14): 2137–2144.
24.
ReyhanogluMHervasJR (2014) Thrust-vector control of a three-axis stabilized upper-stage rocket with fuel slosh dynamics. Acta Astronautica98(1): 120–127.
25.
Shageer H and Tao G (2007) Modeling and Adaptive Control of Spacecraft with Fuel Slosh: Overview and Case Studies. Presented at: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 20–23 August 2007, Hilton Head, South Carolina.
26.
SingerNCSeeringWP (1990) Preshaping command inputs to reduce system vibration. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control112(1): 76–82.
27.
SinghoseWSeeringWSingerN (1994) Residual vibration reduction using vector diagrams to generate shaped inputs. Journal of Mechanical Design116(2): 654–659.
28.
SinghoseWDerezinskiSSingerN (1996) Extra-insensitive input shapers for controlling flexible spacecraft. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics19(2): 385–391.
29.
SmithOJM (1957) Posicast control of damped oscillatory systems. Proceedings of the IRE45(9): 1249–1255.
30.
TangYYueB (2017) Simulation of large-amplitude three-dimensional liquid sloshing in spherical tanks. AIAA Journal55(6): 2052–2059.
31.
Vaughan J, Yano A and Singhose W (2007) Performance Comparison of Robust Input Shapers. In: Proceedings of 2007 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, 30 May–1 June 2007, Guangzhou, China. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp.2111–2116.
32.
YueBZ (2011) Study on the chaotic dynamics in attitude maneuver of liquid-filled flexible spacecraft study on the chaotic dynamics in attitude maneuver of liquid-filled flexible spacecraft. AIAA Journal49(10): 2090–2099.
33.
YueBZZhuLM (2014) Hybrid control of liquid-filled spacecraft maneuvers by dynamics inversion and input shaping. AIAA Journal52(3): 618–626.
34.
YueBZWuWYanY (2016) Modeling and coupling dynamics of the spacecraft with multiple propellant tanks. AIAA Journal54(11): 3608–3618.
35.
ZangQHuangJ (2015) Dynamics and control of three-dimensional slosh in a moving rectangular liquid container undergoing planar excitations. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics60(4): 2309–2318.
36.
ZangQHuangJLiangZ (2015) Slosh suppression for infinite modes in a moving liquid container. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics20(1): 217–225.
37.
ZhuZXiaYFuM (2011) Adaptive sliding mode control for attitude stabilization with actuator saturation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics58(10): 4898–4907.
