In this paper, a novel approach based on the Floquet theory is applied for the stability analysis of a mass–spring system with switchable stiffness. The Reid model is used to describe the dynamics of this semi-active vibration control problem. The semi-active control is achieved by a spring which commutes between a maximum and minimum stiffness according to a prescribed state-dependent rule and its performance is characterized by a system parameter, which relates to the extreme values of the stiffness. In order to apply the Floquet theorem, the Reid model is written as a linear periodic differential equation by converting the state-dependent rule into a time-periodic control law. The application of the theory allows us to obtain the Floquet multipliers and exponents in terms of the system parameter. The multipliers lie inside the unitary circle showing asymptotic stability, while the exponents are used to solve an optimization problem by applying a sensitivity analysis. Our results are validated by analyzing the Reid model using nonlinear analysis techniques. According to our findings, the present approach provides a useful tool to analyze the vibration control of linear systems with switchable stiffness in a natural and straightforward way, which also gives mathematical tractability for optimization purposes. In addition, this approach can be extended to study the cases of multi-degree-of-freedom systems and forced systems.
AdrianovaLY (1995) Introduction to Linear Systems of Differential Equations, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
3.
BacciottiAMazziL (2011) Asymptotic controllability by means of eventually periodic switching rules. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization49(2): 476–497.
4.
BaillieulJLehmanB (1999) Open-loop control using oscillatory inputs. In: LevineW (ed) The Control Handbook, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 1–23.
5.
BertC (1973) Material damping. Journal of Sound and Vibration29(2): 129–153.
6.
BishopRED (1955) The treatment of damping forces in vibration theory. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society59(539): 738–742.
7.
BittantiSColaneriP (2009) Periodic Systems: Filtering and Control, London, UK: Springer.
8.
BrockettR (1999) A stabilization problem. In: BlondelV (eds) Open Problems in Mathematical Systems and Control Theory, London, UK: Springer, pp. 75–78.
9.
CalogeroF (2008) Isochronous Systems, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
CaugheyTVijayaraghavanA (1976) Stability analysis of the periodic solution of a piecewise-linear non-linear dynamic system. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics11(2): 127–134.
11.
CaugheyTVijayaraghavanA (1977) Forced oscillations of a piecewise-linear non-linear dynamic system with several degrees of freedom. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics12(6): 339–353.
12.
CaugheyTKVijayaraghavanA (1970) Free and forced oscillations of a dynamic system with “linear hysteretic damping” (non-linear theory). International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics5(3): 533–555.
13.
ChenJC (1984) Response of large space structures with stiffness control. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets21(5): 463–467.
14.
D'AngeloH (1970) Linear Time-Varying Systems: Analysis and Synthesis, Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
15.
FrankPM (1978) Introduction to System Sensitivity Theory, New York, NY: Academic Press.
16.
FriswellMI (1996) The derivatives of repeated eigenvalues and their associated eigenvectors. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics118(3): 390–397.
17.
Goh CJ (1983) Analysis and control of quasi distributed parameter systems. PhD Dissertation. California Institute of Technology, USA.
18.
GohCJCaugheyTK (1985) A quasi-linear vibration suppression technique for large space structures via stiffness modification. International Journal of Control41(3): 803–812.
19.
HaugEJRousseletB (1980) Design sensitivity analysis in structural mechanics. I: Static response variation. Journal of Structural Mechanics8(1): 17–41.
20.
InaudiJA (1997) Modulated homogeneous friction: A semi-active damping strategy. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics26(3): 361–376.
21.
IoossGJosephDD (1980) Elementary Stability and Bifurcation Theory, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
22.
JacobsenLSAyreRS (1958) Engineering Vibrations: With Applications to Structures and Machinery, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
KapitzaP (1951) Dynamical stability of a pendulum when its point of suspension vibrates and pendulum with a vibrating suspension. In: HarrDT (ed) In Collected Papers of P.L. Kapitza, Volume 2, London, UK: Pergamon Press Ltd., pp. 714–737.
24.
KhalilHK (1996) Nonlinear Systems, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
25.
KimballALLovellDE (1927) Internal friction in solids. Physical Review30(6): 948–959.
26.
LeavittJJabbariFBobrowJE (2007) Optimal performance of variable stiffness devices for structural control. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control129(2): 171–177.
27.
Ledezma-RamirezDFergusonNBrennanM (2012) An experimental switchable stiffness device for shock isolation. Journal of Sound and Vibration331(23): 4987–5001.
28.
LiuCS (2006) Reid's passive and semi-active hysteretic oscillators with friction force dependence on displacement. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics41(6-7): 775–786.
29.
MagnusWWinklerS (2004) Hill's Equation, New York, NY: Dover Publications.
30.
MeerkovSM (1977) Vibrational control theory. Journal of the Franklin Institute303(2): 117–128.
31.
MeyerCD (2000) Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
32.
MontagnierPPaigeCCSpiteriRJ (2003) Real Floquet factors of linear time-periodic systems. Systems and Control Letters50(4): 251–262.
33.
NayfehAHMookDT (1979) Nonlinear Oscillations, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
34.
OnodaJEndotTTamaokiHet al.(1991) Vibration suppression by variable-stiffness members. AIAA Journal29(6): 977–983.
35.
OnodaJSanotTKamiyamaK (1992) Active, passive, and semiactive vibration suppression by stiffness variation. AIAA Journal30(12): 2922–2929.
36.
RamaratnamAJaliliN (2006) A switched stiffness approach for structural vibration control: Theory and real-time implementation. Journal of Sound and Vibration291(1–2): 258–274.
37.
ReidTJ (1956) Free vibration and hysteretic damping. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society60(544): 283.
38.
RichardsJA (1983) Analysis of Periodically Time-Varying Systems, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
39.
ScheidlerJJAsnaniVMDapinoMJ (2016) Dynamically tuned magnetostrictive spring with electrically controlled stiffness. Smart Materials and Structures25(3): 1–10.
40.
SorokaWW (1949) Note on the relations between viscous and structural damping coefficients. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences16(7): 409–410.
41.
StillingDSDSzyszkowskiW (2002) Controlling angular oscillations through mass reconfiguration: A variable length pendulum case. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics37(1): 89–99.
42.
SunJG (1988) Sensitivity analysis of multiple eigenvalues (I). Journal of Computational Mathematics1(1): 28–38.
43.
SzyszkowskiWStillingDSD (2005) On damping properties of a frictionless physical pendulum with a moving mass. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics40(5): 669–681.
44.
WinthropMFBakerWPCobbRG (2005) A variable stiffness device selection and design tool for lightly damped structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration287(4–5): 667–682.
45.
YakubovichVAStarzhinskiiVM (1975) Linear Differential Equations with Periodic Coefficients, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
46.
YoshizawaT (1966) Stability theory by Liapunov's Second Method, Tokyo, Japan: Mathematical Society of Japan.
47.
ZhangYIwanWD (2003) Some observations on two piecewise-linear dynamic systems with induced hysteretic damping. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics38(5): 753–765.
