The problem of third-order consensus of homogeneous vehicular platoons in the presence of communication and parasitic delays is investigated. The communication topology of vehicular networks is assumed to be directed and generic. Therefore, a number of eigenvalues of the network’s matrix are complex, entangling the stability analysis of the closed-loop dynamics. By considering both communication and parasitic delays, a new linear centralized consensus protocol is designed for each vehicle. It will be shown that the closed-loop dynamics of vehicular networks with generic topology is in the form of linear systems with multiple delays. By presenting a new approach, the resultant linear time delay system is decoupled to individual third- and sixth-order dynamical equations. By performing the stability analysis of the new equations, it will be proven that the control parameters are independent of the network’s topology. Therefore, the control design and stability analysis will be significantly simplified compared with previous studies. To find the stable regions of time delay, the cluster treatment characteristic root method is employed. Simulation results are provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
AmoozadehMDengHChuahC-Net al.(2015) Platoon management with cooperative adaptive cruise control enabled by VANET. Vehicular Communications2: 110–123.
2.
ChehardoliHGhasemiA (2017) Adaptive robust output tracking control of uncertain nonlinear cascade systems with disturbance and multiple unknown time varying delays. Asian Journal of Control19(6): 2009–2016.
3.
ChehardoliHGhasemiA (2018) Adaptive centralized/decentralized control and identification of 1-D heterogeneous vehicular platoons based on constant time headway policy. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Epub ahead of print 20 March 2018. DOI:10.1109/TITS.2017.2781152.
4.
ChehardoliHHomaeinezhadM (2016) Robust control of a platoon of vehicles with communication time delay and switched interaction topology. Journal of Control10: 61–70.
5.
Chehardoli H and Homaeinezhad M (2017a) Stable control of a heterogeneous platoon of vehicles with switched interaction topology, time-varying communication delay and lag of actuator. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 231(22): 4197–4208.
6.
Chehardoli H and Homaeinezhad MR (2017b) Switching decentralized control of a platoon of vehicles with time-varying heterogeneous delay: a safe and dense spacing policy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 232(8): 1036–1046.
7.
Chehardoli H and Homaeinezhad MR (2017c) Third-order safe consensus of heterogeneous vehicular platoons with MPF network topology: constant time headway strategy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 232(10): 1402–1413.
8.
ChehardoliHHomaienezhadMR (2018) Third-order leader-following consensus protocol of traffic flow formed by cooperative vehicular platoons by considering time delay: constant spacing strategy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering232(3): 285–298.
9.
CookPA (2007) Stable control of vehicle convoys for safety and comfort. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control52: 526–531.
10.
Di BernardoMFalconePSalviAet al.(2016) Design, analysis, and experimental validation of a distributed protocol for platooning in the presence of time-varying heterogeneous delays. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology24: 413–427.
11.
Di BernardoMSalviASantiniS (2015) Distributed consensus strategy for platooning of vehicles in the presence of time-varying heterogeneous communication delays. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems16: 102–112.
12.
ErgencAFOlgacNFazeliniaA (2007) Extended Kronecker summation for cluster treatment of LTI systems with multiple delays. International Journal of Control46: 143–155.
13.
GhasemiAKazemiRAzadiS (2013) Stable decentralized control of a platoon of vehicles with heterogeneous information feedback. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology62: 4299–4308.
14.
GhasemiAKazemiRAzadiS (2015a) Exact stability of a platoon of vehicles by considering time delay and lag. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology29: 799–805.
15.
Ghasemi A, Kazemi R and Azadi S (2015b) Stability analysis of bidirectional adaptive cruise control with asymmetric information flow. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 229: 216-226.
16.
HuangJHuangQDengYet al.(2017) Toward robust vehicle platooning with bounded spacing error. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems36: 562–572.
17.
JiaDNgoduyD (2016) Platoon based cooperative driving model with consideration of realistic inter-vehicle communication. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies68: 245–264.
18.
KianfarRFalconePFredrikssonJ (2015) A control matching model predictive control approach to string stable vehicle platooning. Control Engineering Practice45: 163–173.
19.
KnornSDonaireAAgüeroJCet al.(2015) Scalability of bidirectional vehicle strings with static and dynamic measurement errors. Automatica62: 208–212.
20.
KwonJ-WChwaD (2014) Adaptive bidirectional platoon control using a coupled sliding mode control method. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems15: 2040–2048.
21.
LiSEQinXZhengYet al.(2017) Distributed platoon control under topologies with complex eigenvalues: stability analysis and controller synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. Epub ahead of print 10 November 2017. DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2017.2768041.
22.
MarsdenGMcDonaldMBrackstoneM (2001) Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies9: 33–51.
23.
MeyerCD (2010) Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
NausGJVugtsRPPloegJet al.(2010) String-stable CACC design and experimental validation: a frequency-domain approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology59: 4268–4279.
25.
Peng Y-F, Hsu C-F, Lin C-M, et al. (2006) Robust intelligent backstepping longitudinal control of vehicle platoons with h/infin tracking performance. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Taiwan, October 2006, pp. 4648–4653. New York: IEEE.
26.
PetersAAMiddletonRHMasonO (2014) Leader tracking in homogeneous vehicle platoons with broadcast delays. Automatica50: 64–74.
27.
PetrilloASalviASantiniSet al.(2018) Adaptive multi-agents synchronization for collaborative driving of autonomous vehicles with multiple communication delays. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies86: 372–392.
28.
RajamaniR (2011) Vehicle Dynamics and Control, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
29.
RajamaniRChoiSLawBet al.(2000) Design and experimental implementation of longitudinal control for a platoon of automated vehicles. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control122: 470–476.
30.
SalviASantiniSValenteAS (2017) Design, analysis and performance evaluation of a third order distributed protocol for platooning in the presence of time-varying delays and switching topologies. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies80: 360–383.
31.
SantiniSSalviAValenteASet al.(2017) A consensus-based approach for platooning with intervehicular communications and its validation in realistic scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology66: 1985–1999.
32.
SwaroopDHedrickJKChoiSB (2001) Direct adaptive longitudinal control of vehicle platoons. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology50: 150–161.
33.
Wang C and Nijmeijer H (2015) String stable heterogeneous vehicle platoon using cooperative adaptive cruise control. In: IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Spain, September 2015, pp. 1977-1982. New York: IEEE.
34.
WangF-Y (2010) Parallel control and management for intelligent transportation systems: Concepts, architectures, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems11: 630–638.
35.
XiaoLGaoF (2011) Practical string stability of platoon of adaptive cruise control vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems12: 1184–1194.
36.
Xu L, Wang LY, Yin G, et al. (2013) Coordinated control and communication for enhanced safety of highway vehicle platoons. In: International conference on connected vehicles and expo (ICCVE), USA, December 2013, pp. 43-47. New York: IEEE.
37.
ZhangLOroszG (2016) Motif-based design for connected vehicle systems in presence of heterogeneous connectivity structures and time delays. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems17: 1638–1651.
38.
ZhengYLiSEWangJet al.(2016) Stability and scalability of homogeneous vehicular platoon: Study on the influence of information flow topologies. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems17: 14–26.
39.
ZhengYLiSELiKet al.(2017) Distributed model predictive control for heterogeneous vehicle platoons under unidirectional topologies. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology25: 899–910.
