Numerical analysis of the influence of an actively controlled spoiler on the handling of a sports car

Abstract

Normal force distribution among tires significantly affects the performance of the vehicle, especially in terms of handling and safety. Consequently, evolving technologies for controlling and regulating normal loads have the potential of boosting the controllability of the vehicle.

This paper illustrates the effectiveness of the actively controlled aerodynamic system to increase the performance and the safety margins of a sports car in cornering maneuvers; normal loads on the front and rear axles at high speed are controlled by changing the angle of attack of the front and rear spoilers in opposite directions to alter load distribution. The performance of the controlled system is analyzed through a nonlinear 14-degree-of-freedom vehicle model. Numerical simulations are carried out to understand how the control logic can affect oversteer/understeer response, improving both stability and performance of the vehicle. Robustness of the control systems toward the variation of friction coefficient is also assessed.

Keywords

Active Aerodynamics Control vehicle dynamics and control active spoiler longitudinal load transfer normal load distribution yaw rate control active controller vehicle active safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Von Doenhoff

(1959) Theory of Wing Sections: Including a Summary of Aerofoil Data, New York, NY: Dover Publications Inc.

Ahangarnejad

Başlamışlı

SÇ

(2016) Adap-tyre: DEKF filtering for vehicle state estimation based on tyre parameter adaptation. International Journal of Vehicle Design 71(1–4): 52–74.

Barnard

(2009) Road Vehicle Aerodynamic Design-An Introduction, St. Albans, Herfordshire, UK: Mechaero Publishing.

Brunn A, Wassen E, Sperber D, et al. (2007) Active drag control for a generic car model. In: King, R. (ed.) Active Flow Control. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp.247–259.

Chen

Kuo

(2014) Electronic stability control for electric vehicle with four in-wheel motors. International Journal of Automotive Technology 15(4): 573–580.

Chen

Xiao

Wang

et al. (2016) Integrated Vehicle Dynamics and Control, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.

Corno

Bottelli

Tanelli

et al. (2014) Active control of aerodynamic surfaces for ride control in sport vehicles. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 47(3): 7553–7558.

Croft-White

Harrison

(2006) Study of torque vectoring for all-wheel-drive vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 44(sup1): 313–320.

D’alfio

Morgando

Sorniotti

(2006) Electro-hydraulic brake systems: design and test through hardware-in-the-loop simulation. Vehicle System Dynamics 44(sup1): 378–392.

10.

Doniselli

Mastinu

Gobbi

(1996) Aerodynamic effects on ride comfort and road holding of automobiles. Vehicle System Dynamics 25(S1): 99–125.

11.

Fasel H, Hack A, Rossmanith R, et al. (2002) Motor vehicle with flow-influencing devices to reduce air resistance. Patent No. 6,378,932, USA.

12.

Hamzah N, Aripin MK, Sam YM, et al. (2012) Yaw stability improvement for four-wheel active steering vehicle using sliding mode control. In: 2012 IEEE 8th international colloquium on signal processing and its applications (CSPA), March 2012, pp.127–132. Melaka, Malaysia.

13.

Johansson MO and Katz J (2002) Lateral aerodynamics of a generic Sprint car configuration (No. 2002-01-3312). SAE Technical Paper.

14.

Katz

(2006) Aerodynamics of race cars. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 38: 27–63.

15.

Goodarzi

Khajepour

et al. (2015) An optimal torque distribution control strategy for four-independent wheel drive electric vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 53(8): 1172–1189.

16.

Mohrfeld-Halterman

Uddin

(2016a) Quasi steady-state aerodynamic model development for race vehicle simulations. Vehicle System Dynamics 54(1): 124–136.

17.

Mohrfeld-Halterman

Uddin

(2016b) High fidelity quasi steady-state aerodynamic model effects on race vehicle performance predictions using multi-body simulation. Vehicle System Dynamics 54(7): 1–19.

18.

Morgando

Velardocchia

Vigliani

et al. (2011) An alternative approach to automotive ESC based on measured wheel forces. Vehicle System Dynamics 49(12): 1855–1871.

19.

Pacejka

(2005) Tire and Vehicle Dynamics, butterworth: Elsevier.

20.

Savkoor A and Happel H (1996) Aerodynamic vehicle ride control with active spoilers. In: 3rd proceedings of international symposium on advanced vehicle control, 1996, pp.647–682. RWTH, Aachen, Germany.

21.

Savkoor

Manders

Riva

(2001) Design of actively controlled aerodynamic devices for reducing pitch and heave of truck cabins. JSAE Review 22(4): 421–434.

22.

Savkoor

Chou

(1999) Application of aerodynamic actuators to improve vehicle handling. Vehicle System Dynamics 32(4-5): 345–374.

23.

Scibor-Rylski AJ (1984) Road vehicle aerodynamics (No. Monograph).

24.

Verma

Ginoya

Shendge

et al. (2015) Slip regulation for anti-lock braking systems using multiple surface sliding controller combined with inertial delay control. Vehicle System Dynamics 53(8): 1150–1171.

25.

Yin

(2014) Active approach to electronic stability control for front-wheel drive in-wheel motor electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Technology 15(6): 979–987.

26.

Zhang

Zerihan

(2003) Aerodynamics of a double-element wing in ground effect. AIAA Journal 41(6): 1007–1016.