The hypersonic waverider using the morphing configuration can improve the overall performance and broaden the flight range. On the other hand, the hypersonic waverider belongs to the lightweight construction, leading to the presence of the intrinsic elasticity. As a result, the integrated consideration of the active deformation and elastic action is important for the morphing waverider to realize global optimization. In this paper, the contro-integrated design methods are proposed for the morphing waverider to implement the trade-off analysis between the active deformation and intrinsic elasticity. First, the parametric model is built to describe the hypersonic flight characteristics. Then, the elastic dynamics is introduced to quantify the coupling responses associated with the angle of attack and elevon deflection. Furthermore, the integrated design is considered for the active deformation and inherent elastic action, and also the control law is designed to suppress the active and passive morphing disturbances. Finally, the simulation is conducted to test the effectiveness of the presented methods for the morphing waverider.
BiskriDEBotezRMStathopoulosN (2008) Aeroservoelasticity Analysis Method Based on an Error Analytical Form Applied on a Business Aircraft. Journal of Vibration and Control14: 1217–1230.
2.
BolenderMADomanDB (2007) Nonlinear Longitudinal Dynamical Model of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets44: 374–387.
3.
ChavezFRSchmidtDK (1994) Analytical Aeropropulsive/Aeroelastic Hypersonic Vehicle Model with Dynamic Analysis. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics17: 1308–1319.
4.
Chowdhary PV and Pant RS (2010) Application of Optimization Techniques in the Conceptual Design of Morphing Aircraft. In: 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, Texas. AIAA Paper 2010-9312, pp. 1–8.
5.
Clark AD, Mirmirani MD and Wu C (2006) An Aero-Propulsion Integrated Elastic Model of a Generic Airbreathing Hypersonic Vehicle. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. AIAA Paper 2006-6560, pp. 1–20.
6.
DuanHBLiP (2012) Progress in control approaches for hypersonic vehicle. Science China: Technological Sciences55: 2965–2970.
7.
FalkiewiczNJCesnikCECrowellAR (2011) Reduced-Order Aerothermoelastic Framework for Hypersonic Vehicle Control Simulation. AIAA Journal49: 1625–1646.
8.
Fidan B, Kuipers M and Ioannou P A (2006) Longitudinal motion control of air-breathing hypersonic vehicles based on time-varying models. In: 14th AIAA/AHI Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Canberra. AIAA Paper 2006-8074, pp. 1–13.
9.
Grant DT and Lind R (2010) Optimal Tracking of Time-Varying Modes For Control of Morphing Aircraft. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, Ontario Canada. AIAA Paper 2010-8203, pp. 1–17.
10.
HeZLuYP (2012) Constrained cooperative control design for distributed morphing wing systems. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics23: 588–595.
11.
JohnsonENCaliseAJCurryMD (2006) Adaptive Guidance and Control for Autonomous Hypersonic Vehicles. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics29: 725–737.
12.
LiHFLinPXuDJ (2011) Control-oriented Modeling for Air-breathing Hypersonic Vehicle Using Parameterized Configuration Approach. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics24: 81–89.
13.
LindR (2002) Linear Parameter-Varying Modeling and Control of Structural Dynamics with Aerothermoelastic Effects. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics25: 733–739.
14.
LiuYBDengJLuYP (2013a) Preliminary Research on Optimal Design Based on Control Demands for Hypersonic Morphing Vehicle. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine28: 23–31.
15.
LiuYBYaoKMLuYP (2013b) Decoupling control of pullout maneuver for mars airplane. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control9: 1603–1616.
16.
McNamaraJJFriedmannPP (2011) Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Analysis in Hypersonic Flow: Past, Present, and Future. AIAA Journal49: 1089–1122.
17.
McNamara JJ, Culler AJ and Crowell AR (2009) Aerothermoelastic Modeling Considerations for Hypersonic Vehicles. In: 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Bremen, Germany. AIAA Paper 2009-7397, pp. 1–38.
18.
Niksch A, Valasek J and Strganac TW (2009) Six Degree of Freedom Dynamical Model of a Morphing Aircraft. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Chicago, Illinois. AIAA Paper 2009-5849, pp. 1–25.
19.
Obradovic B and Subbarao K (2010) Modeling of Dynamic Loading of Morphing Wing Aircraft. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Toronto, Ontario Canada. AIAA Paper 2010-8236, pp. 1–23.
20.
ParkerJKSerraniAYurkovichS (2007) Control-Oriented Modeling of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics30: 856–869.
21.
Rodriguez AA, Dickeson JJ and Sridharan S (2009) Control-relevant modeling, analysis, and design for scramjet-powered hypersonic vehicles. In: Proceedings of 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Norfolk, VA. AIAA Paper 2009-7287, pp. 1–45.
22.
SkujinsTCesnikCEOppenheimerMX (2010) Canard–Elevon Interactions on a Hypersonic Vehicle. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets47: 90–100.
23.
SigthorssonDOJankovskyPSerraniA (2008) Robust Linear Output Feedback Control of an Airbreathing Hypersonic Vehicle. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics31: 1052–1066.
24.
SunHBLiSHSunCY (2013) Finite time integral sliding mode control of hypersonic vehicles. Nonlinear Dynamics73: 229–244.
25.
Torrez SM, Driscoll JF and Dalle DJ (2009) Hypersonic Vehicle Thrust Sensitivity to Angle of Attack and Mach Number. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Chicago, Illinois. AIAA Paper 2009-6152, pp. 1–16.
26.
WangYHZhangQZhuL (2015) Active control of hypersonic airfoil flutter via adaptive fuzzy sliding mode method. Journal of Vibration and Control21: 134–141.
27.
WeisshaarTA (2013) Morphing Aircraft Systems: Historical Perspectives and Future Challenges. Journal of Aircraft50: 337–353.
28.
Whitmer CE, Kelkar AG and Vogel JM (2010) Control Centric Parametric Trade Studies for Scramjet-Powered Hypersonic Vehicles. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, Ontario Canada, AIAA Paper 2010-8283, pp. 1–29.
29.
WilcoxZDMacKunisWBhatS (2010) Lyapunov-Based Exponential Tracking Control of a Hypersonic Aircraft with Aerothermoelastic Effects. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics33: 1213–1224.
30.
Williams T, Bolender MA and Doman DB (2006) An Aerothermal Flexible Mode Analysis of a Hypersonic Vehicle. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado. AIAA Paper 2006-6647, pp. 1–22.
31.
WuLGYangXBLiF (2013) Nonfragile Output Tracking Control of Hypersonic Air-Breathing Vehicles With an LPV Model. IEEE transacitons on Mechatronics18: 1280–1288.
32.
XuBWangDWSunFC (2013) Direct neural control of hypersonic flight vehicles with prediction model in discrete time. Neurocomputing115: 39–48.
33.
YokoyamaNSuzukiSTsuchiyaT (2007) Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Space Plane Considering Rigid Body Characteristics. Journal of spacecraft and rockets44: 121–131.
34.
YoonSLeeSJLeeB (2013) Design and Flight Test of a Small Tri-Rotor Unmanned Vehicle with a LQR Based Onboard Attitude Control System. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control9: 2347–2360.
35.
ZengKCXiangJWLiDC (2013) Aeroservoelastic modeling and analysis of a canard-configured air-breathing hypersonic vehicles. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics26: 831–840.
36.
ZhaoJZhouRJinXL (2014) Progress in reentry trajectory planning for hypersonic vehicle. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics25: 627–639.
37.
ZongQWangFSuR (2015) Robust adaptive backstepping tracking control for a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle subject to input constraint. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering229: 10–25.
