In this paper, an intelligent control approach based on neuro-fuzzy systems performance is presented, with the objective of counteracting the vibrations that affect the low-cost vision platform onboard an unmanned aerial system of rotating nature. A scaled dynamical model of a helicopter is used to simulate vibrations on its fuselage. The impact of these vibrations on the low-cost vision system will be assessed and an intelligent control approach will be derived in order to reduce its detrimental influence. Different trials that consider a neuro-fuzzy approach as a fundamental part of an intelligent semi-active control strategy have been carried out. Satisfactory results have been achieved compared to those obtained by means of vibration reduction passive techniques.
AlanolyJSankarS (1987) A new concept in semi-active vibration isolation. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design109(2): 242–247.
2.
BittantiSLoveraM (1996) On the zero dynamics of helicopter rotor loads. European Journal Control2(1): 57–68.
3.
Decker WA, et al. (1982) A mathematical model of a single main rotor helicopter for piloted simulation. Technical memorandum NASA 84281, The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California.
4.
Garrad W and Low E (1990) Eigenspace design of helicopter flight control systems. Technical report, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics.
5.
GuijarroMPajaresG (2009) On combining classifiers through a fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach: applied to natural textured images. Expert System with Applications36(3): 7262–7269.
6.
Heffley RK and Mnich MA (1988) Minimum complexity helicopter simulation math model. Contractor report NASA 177476, Aeroflight dynamics Directorate, United Stated Army Research and Technology Activity.
JansenLMDykeSJ (1999) Semi-active control strategies for MR dampers: a comparative study. Journal of Engineering Mechanics126(8): 795–803.
9.
JohnsonW (1980) Helicopter Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
KaloustJHamCQuZ (1997) Nonlinear autopilot control design for a 2-DOF helicopter model. Control Theory and Applications, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Proceedings144(6): 612–616.
11.
KarnoppDCCrosbyMJHarwoodRA (1974) Vibration control using semi-active force generators. Journal of Engineering for Industry96(2): 619–626.
12.
Kienitz K, Wu Q and Mansour M (1990) Robust stabilization of a helicopter model. Proceedings of the 29th CDC, pp.2607–2612.
13.
KoskoB (1992) Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems: A Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine Intelligence, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
MarichalGN (2001) Obstacle avoidance for a mobile robot: a neuro fuzzy approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems124(2): 171–179.
15.
Miller LR (1988) Tuning passive, semi-active, and fully active suspension systems. In: proceedings of the 27th conference on decision and control, Austin, TX, pp. 2047--2053.
16.
MitraSHayashiS (2000) Neuro-fuzzy rule generation: Survey in soft computing framework. Transactions on Neural Networks11(3): 748–768.
17.
MousseauCWSayersMWFaganDJ(1992) Symbolic quasistatic and dynamic analyses of complex automobile models. In: SauvageG (ed.) The Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and on Railway Tracks. Proceedings of Twelfth IAVSD Symposium, pp. 446–459. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
18.
Narramore JC (1995) Computational fluid dynamics development and validation at Bell Helicopter, Textron Bell Helicopter, Fort Worth, TX. In AGARD, Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics of Rotorcraft 13 (SEE N96-13582 02-01).
19.
PadfieldGD (1996) Helicopter Flight Dynamics: The Theory and Application of Flying Qualities and Simulation Modelling, Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
PajaresG (2006) A Hopfield neural network for image change detection. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transaction on Neural Networks17(5): 1250–1264.
21.
RakhejaSSankarS (1985) Vibration and shock isolation performance of a semi-active “on–off” damper. Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design107: 398–403.
22.
RakhejaSSankarS (1986) Effectiveness of “on–off” damper in isolation dynamical systems. Shock and Vibration Bulletin57: 147–156.
23.
SayersMW (1999) Vehicle models for RTS applications. Vehicle System Dynamics32(4–5): 421–438.
24.
SharpRSEvangelouSLimebeerDJN (2004) Advances in the modeling of motorcycle dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics12(3): 251–283.
25.
SharpRSEvangelouSLimebeerDJN(2005) Multibody aspects of motorcycle modelling with special reference to Autosim. In: AmbrósioJG (ed.) Advances in Computational Multibody Systems, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 45–68.
26.
Steele GLJrGuyL (1984) COMMON LISP: The Language, Burlington, MA: Digital Press.
Tomás-Rodríguez M and Sharp R (2007) Automated modeling of rotorcraft dynamics with special reference to AutoSim, automation science and engineering. In: institute of electrical and electronics engineers international conference (CASE 2007), 2007, pp.974-979.
29.
VerdultVLoveraMVerhaegenM (2004) Identification of linear parameter-varying state-space models with application to helicopter rotor dynamics. International Journal of Control77(13): 1149–1159.
30.
WuXGriffinMJ (1997) A semi-active control policy to reduce the occurrence and severity of end-stop impacts in a suspension seat with an electrorheological fluid damper. Journal of Sound and Vibration203(5): 781–793.
31.
ZadehLA (1989) Knowledge representation in fuzzy logic. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering1(1): 89–100.
