A multi-input multi-output (MIMO) random vibration control method is proposed for a multi-axis hydraulic shaking table system to replicate the reference power spectral density (PSD). Kinematics analysis is presented to reduce cross-coupling between the axes of the hydraulic shaking table. The time histories generated by time domain randomization in conventional MIMO random vibration control have spectral leakage between the frequency resolutions. The drive signal PSD is used in the proposed control method to design a linear time-invariant system. Circular convolution is then proposed to implement the designed system and convert the PSD to time histories with white noise. Experimental results obtained in step response and two-axis PSD replication show the effectiveness of the proposed control method.
BartPJanD (2001) MIMO random vibration control algorithm and simulations. Proceedings of the 72nd Shock and Vibration Symposium. November; San Destin, FL1–11.
2.
ClarkAJ (1992) Dynamic characteristics of large multiple degree of freedom shaking tables. Proceedings of Earthquake Engineering, 10th World Conference. July 19–24; Rotterdam, The Netherlands2823–2828.
3.
DoddsCJPlummerAR (2001) Laboratory road simulation for full vehicle testing: a review. Proceedings of Symposium on International Automotive Technology. 487–494.
4.
DozonoYHoriuchiTKatsumataH (2004) Shaking-table control by real-time compensation of the reaction force caused by a nonlinear specimen. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology126: 122–127.
5.
FisherDKPosehnMR (1977) Digital control system for a multiple-actuator shaker. 47th Shock and Vibration Bulletin, NM, Albuquerque, pp. 79–96.
6.
HarrisCMPiersolAG (2001) Harris’ Shock and Vibration Handbook, 5th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, pp. 21.25–21.30.
7.
IEC-60068-2-64 (2008) Environmental Testing - Part 2-64: Tests- Test Fh: Vibration, Broadband Random and Guidance, Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission.
8.
Karshenas AM, Dunnigan MW and Williams BW (2000) Adaptive inverse control algorithm for shock testing. In Proceedings of IET Control Theory and Applications vol. 147(3), pp. 267–276.
9.
KusnerDARoodJDBurtonGW (1992) Signal reproduction fidelity of servo hydraulic testing equipment. Proceedings of Earthquake Engineering, 10th World Conference. July 19–24; Rotterdam, The Netherlands2683–2688.
10.
LucoJEOzcelikOConteJP (2010) Acceleration tracking performance of the UCSD-NEES shake table. Journal of Structural Engineering136(5): 481–490.
11.
MerletJP (1993) Direct kinematics of parallel manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation9(6): 842–846.
12.
MIL-STD-810G (2008) Environmental engineering considerations and laboratory tests-Part two-Laboratory test methods-Vibration.
13.
OppenheimAVSchaferRW (1998) Discrete-time Digital Signal Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
14.
PetersenNRLarsonRL (1975) Multiple actuator control system. US Patent. 3,918,298–3,918,298.
15.
PlummerAR (2004) Modal control for a class of multi-axis vibration table. Proceedings of United Kingdom Automatic Control Council Mini Symposia. 6–9; Bath, UK, September111–115.
16.
PlummerAR (2007) Control techniques for structural testing: a review. 221. Proceedings of IMechE, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering. 139–169.
17.
Sanders TM (2011) Shaker table vibration testing of a microsatellite. PhD Thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology, MO.
18.
SmallwoodDO (1982) Random vibration testing of a single test item with a multiple input control system. Proceedings of the Institute of Environmental Sciences’ 28th Annual Technical Meeting. April 21–23; Dallas, TX55–61.
19.
SmallwoodDO (1999) Multiple shaker random vibration control-an update. Proceedings of Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology Annual Meeting. CA212–221.
20.
SmallwoodDOPaezTL (1993) A frequency domain method for the generation of partially coherent normal stationary time domain signals. Shock and Vibration1(1): 45–53.
21.
Soderling S, Sharp M and Leser C (1999) Servo controller compensation methods selection of the correct technique for test applications. SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-3000.
22.
StotenDPGómezEG (2001) Adaptive control of shaking tables using the minimal control sysnthesis algorithm. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of LondonA 359: 1697–1723.
23.
StotenDPShimizuN (2007) The feedforward minimal control synthesis algorithm and its application to the control of shaking-tables. Proceedings of IMechE Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering221: 423–444.
24.
StroudRCHammaGAUnderwoodMA (1996) A review of multiaxis/multiexciter vibration technology. Sound and Vibration30(4): 20–27.
25.
TagawaYKajiwaraK (2007) Controller development for the E-Defense shaking table. 221. Proceedings of IMechE, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering. 171–181.
26.
ThoenBKMinnEP (1992) Sinusoidal signal amplitude and phase control for an adaptive feedback control system. US Patent. 5,124,626–5,124,626.
27.
UnderwoodMAKellerT (2004) Rectangular control of multi-shaker systems: theory and some practical results. Journal of the Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (IEST)47(1): 80–86.
28.
UnderwoodMAKellerT (2006) Applying coordinate transformations to multi degree of freedom shaker control. Sound and Vibration40(1): 22–27.
29.
ZhangSYHanJWZhaoH (2004) RCP and RT control of 6-DOF parallel robot. Proceedings of Fourth International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control. June 17–20; Oulu, Finland133–137.
