This paper presents a multi-purpose uniaxial earthquake simulator that has been designed and developed at the Johns Hopkins University. The earthquake simulator is coupled with a flexible platform that facilitates the development of actuator control strategies to enhance accuracy in shake table tests. The development platform provides a full access to processes in control including an actuator servo control loop, enabling high-fidelity controller designs to be implemented and experimentally investigated for earthquake simulators. This paper presents construction details, hydraulic components, dynamic specifications, an integrated control and data acquisition system, and example applications of the earthquake simulator. The paper demonstrates the versatility of the earthquake simulator and the development platform that can be adopted elsewhere.
AbdullaMHuKKirmserPHSwartzS (1998) The KSU shaking table and the stiffness decoupler technology. In Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference,San Diego, CA, May 17–20: pp. 774–778.
2.
BruneauMReinhornAConstantinouMThevanayagamSWhittakerAChuSY (2002) Versatile shake tables and large-scale high-performance testing facility towards real-time hybrid seismic testing. In Proceedings of ASCE Structures Congress,Denver, CO.
3.
ConteJTrombettiT (2000) Linear dynamic modeling of a uniaxial servo-hydraulic shaking table system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics29(9): 1375–1404.
4.
DixonRPenzienJ (1974) Dynamic response of a 20ft. by 20ft. shaking table. In Proceedings of the 5th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Italy.
5.
DykeS (1998) Design and development of the Washington University seismic simulator facility. In Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, San Diego, CA, May 17–20: pp. 762–765.
6.
DykeS (2000) Current directions in earthquake engineering education. In Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Austin, TX.
7.
DykeSSpencerBQuastPSainM (1995) Role of control-structure interaction in protective system design. Journal of Engineering Mechanics121(2): 322–338.
8.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (2010) 2010 Undergraduate seismic design competition. Available at http://slc.eeri.org/seismic.htm.
9.
GavinHJamiesonHBattD (1998) A shaking table for experimental dynamics and control. In Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, San Diego CA, May 17–20: pp. 787–790.
10.
JohnsonNRanfRSaiidiMSandersDEberhardM (2007) Seismic testing of a two-span reinforced concrete bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering13(2): 173–182.
11.
KuehnJPattenW (1999) High-fidelity control of a seismic shake table. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics28(11): 1235–1254.
12.
KuehnJEppDPattenW (1998) A high fidelity control for seismic shake tables. In Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, San Diego, CA, May 17–20: pp. 783–786.
13.
LucoJOzcelikOConteJ (2009) Acceleration tracking performance of the UCSD-NEES shake table. Journal of Structural Engineering. Posted ahead of print 29 October 2009.
14.
NagarajaiahSGozdowskiE (1998) Unidirectional shaking table for testing small scale structural models: design and development. In Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, San Diego, CA, May 17–20: pp. 779–782.
15.
NakataN (2010) Acceleration trajectory tracking control for earthquake simulators. Engineering Structures32(8): 2229–2236.
16.
OhtaniKOgawaNKatayamaTShibataH (2003) Project “E-defense”: 3D full-scale earthquake testing facility. In Proceedings of the Joint NCREE/JRC WorkshopTaipei, Taiwan, November 17–20.
17.
ReinhornABruneauMWhittakerAConstantinouMThevanayagamSChuS (2002) A versatile high performance testing facility towards real-time dynamic hybrid testing. In Proceedings of the 7th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering,Boston, MA.
18.
RothSCheneyD (2001) Directory of international earthquake engineering research facilities. SRI International Center for Science, Technology and Educational Development Policy Division.
19.
SpencerBYangG (1998) Earthquake simulator control by transfer function iteration. In Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, San Diego, CA, May 17–20: pp. 766–769.
20.
SymansMTwitchellB (1998) System identification of a uniaxial seismic simulator. In Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference,San Diego, CA, May 17–20: pp. 758–761.
21.
TrombettiTConteJDurraniA (1998) Actuator-foundation-specimen interaction in a small shaking table. In Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, San Diego, CA, May 17–20: pp. 770–773.
22.
TwitchellBSymansM (2003) Analytical modeling, system identification, and tracking performance of uniaxial seismic simulators. Journal of Engineering Mechanics129(12): 1485–1488.
23.
ZhaoJShieldCFrenchCPosberghT (2005) Nonlinear system modeling and velocity feedback compensation for effective force testing. Journal of Engineering Mechanics131(3): 244–253.
