American Association of University Women. (1995). How schools shortchange girls.New York: Marlowe & Company.
2.
BerubeM. (Ed.). (1983). The American heritage dictionary (2nd college ed.) New York: Dell.
3.
BrownL., & GilliganC. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads.New York: Ballantine Books.
4.
BuescherT. M., OlszewskiP., & HinghamS.J. (1987, April). Influences on strategies adolescents use to cope with their own recognized talents. Paper presented at Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Baltimore, MA.
5.
CallahanC., CunninghamC., & PluckerJ. (1994). Foundations for the future: The socio-emotional development of gifted, adolescent females.Roeper Review,17, 99–104.
6.
ChickeringA. W. (1969). Education and identity.San Francisco: Jossey & Bass.
7.
ChodorowN. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender.Berkley, CA: University of California.
8.
CoreyG. (1996). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing.
9.
EagleC., & ColmanC. (1993). All that she can be.New York: Simon & Schuster.
10.
FoxL., & TobinD. (1988). Broadening career horizons for gifted girls.Gifted Child Today,11(1), 9–13.
11.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
GilliganC., LyonsN., & HanmerC. (1990). Making connections: The relational world of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
HallR. M., & SandlerB. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women?Project on the Status and Education of Women of the Association of American Colleges, Washington, DC.
14.
HancockE. (1989). The girl within.New York: Ballantine Books.
15.
HayC., & BakkenL. (1991). Gifted sixth-grade girls: Similarities and differences in attitudes among gifted girls, non-gifted peers, and their mothers.Roeper Review,13, 158–160.
16.
HayesL. (1986). The superwoman myth. Social casework.The Journal of Contemporary Social Work,67, 436–441.
17.
HinghamS. J., & NavarreJ. (1984). Gifted adolescent females require different treatment.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,8, 43–58.
18.
HollingerC. (1983). Counseling the gifted and talented female adolescent: The relationship between social self-esteem and traits of instrumentality and expressiveness.Gifted Child Quarterly,27, 157–160.
19.
KerrB. (1988). Career counseling for gifted girls and women.Journal of Career Development,14, 259–267.
20.
KramerL. R. (1991). The social construction of ability perception: An ethnographic study of gifted adolescent girls.Journal of Early Adolescence,11, 340–362.
21.
LewisJ., KarnesF., & KnightH. (1995). A study of self-actualization and self-concept in intellectually gifted students.Psychology in the Schools,32, 52–60.
22.
LiA. K. F. (1988). Self-perception and motivational orientation in gifted children.Roeper Review,10, 175–180.
23.
LoebR. C., & JayG. (1987). Self-concepts in gifted children: Differential impact in boys and girls.Gifted Child Quarterly,31, 9–13.
24.
NobleK. D. (1989). Living out the promise of high potential: Perceptions of 100 gifted women.Advanced Development,1, 57–75.
25.
ReisS. (1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females.Gifted Child Quarterly,31, 83–88.
26.
RodensteinJ., PflegerL. R., & ColangeloN. (1977). Career development of gifted women.Gifted Child Quarterly,21, 340–347.
27.
SangiulianoI. (1980). In her time.New York: Morrow.
28.
SearsP. S., & BarbeeA. H. (1977). Career and life satisfactions among Terman's gifted women. In StanleyJ. C., GeorgeW. C., & SolanoC. H. (Eds.). The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
SheehyG. (1974). Passages.New York: E. P. Dutton.
30.
SilvermanL. (1991). Helping gifted girls reach their potential.Roeper Review,13, 122–123.
31.
SilvermanL. (1994/1995). To be gifted or feminine.The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6, 141–153.
32.
SchwartzL. L. (1980). Advocacy for the neglected gifted: Females.Gifted Child Quarterly,24, 113–117.
33.
WellsM. (1985). Gifted females: An overview for parents, teachers, and counselors.Gifted Child Today,38(3), 43–46.
34.
WhiteW. L. (1984). The perceived effects of an early enrichment experience: A fourth year follow-up study of the Speyer School experiment for gifted students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs.
35.
YahneC., & LongV. (1988). The use of support groups to raise self-esteem for women clients.College Health,37, 79–84.