BloomB.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain.New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
2.
BrownM. (1995). The information superhighway: Making sense of cyberspace. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 7(1), 3, 8.
3.
FeldhusenJ. (1994). Developing units of instruction. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.Comprehensive curriculum far gifted learners (2nd ed.) (pp. 91–128). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
GanapoleS. (1989). Designing an integrated curriculum for gifted learners: An organizational framework. Roeper Review, 12(2), 81–86.
5.
HancockV. (1995). Navigating the net. Educational Leadership, 53(2), 24–25, 27.
6.
LaQueyT.RyerJ.C. (1993). The Internet companion plus (p. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
LeSueurE. (1996). Educational provisions: The primary school. In McAlpineD.MoltzenR.Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives (pp. 159–170). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University E.R.D.C.
8.
MakerJ.NielsonA. (1995). Teaching models in education of the gifted (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–11). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
9.
RenzulliJ. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
10.
RileyT. (1996) Conceptual themes in the classroom … Just where are the dragons? Tall Poppies, 21(2), 20–24.
11.
Special Education Services (1986). Educating gifted and talented students in Alberta (pp. 198–226). Alberta, Canada: Special Education Services.
12.
TomlinsonC.A. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle schools: One school's journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 77–87.
13.
TreffingerD. (1975). Teaching for self-directed learning: A priority of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 46–59.
14.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (Ed.). (1994). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (2nd ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.