The Quest for Equity in Gifted Education

Alvino J.R. McDonnel Richert S. (1981). National survey of identification practices in gifted and talented education. Exceptional Children, 48, 124–132.

Archambault F.X. Westberg K.L. Brown S.W. Hallmark B.W. Zhang W. Emmons C.L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16 (2), 103–119.

Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

Coleman M.R. Gallagher J.J. (1992). Report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill, NC: Gifted Education Policy Studies Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. (1975).

Education Week (1992, December 9). Gallup poll finds public support for programs for gifted students, 2.

Elementary and Secondary Act of 1969, 20 U.S.C. § 863.

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. § 236.

Evans A. (1984). Federal policy for the education of the gifted and talented. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.

Ford D.Y. Harris J.J. III (1991). On discovering the hidden treasure of gifted and talented African-American children. Roeper Review, 13 (1), 27–33.

Gallagher J.J. (1988). National agenda for educating gifted students: Statement of priorities. Exceptional Children, 55 (2), 107–114.

Gallagher J.J. (1991). Personal patterns of underachievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14 (3), 221–233.

Harrington J. Harrington C. Karns E. (1991). The Marland Report: Twenty years later. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15 (1), 31–43.

Harris J.J. III Ford D.Y. (1991). Identifying and nurturing the promise of gifted Black students. Journal of Negro Education, 60 (1), 3–18.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. (1990).

Irvine D.J. (1991). Gifted education with a state mandate: The importance of vigorous advocacy. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35 (4), 196–199.

Karnes F.A. Marquardt R.G. (1991). Gifted Children and the Law. Dayton, Ohio: Ohio Psychology Press.

Karnes F.A. Whorton J.E. (1991). Teacher certification and endorsement in gifted education: Past, present, and future. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35 (3), 148–150.

Marland S. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. GPO.

Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 348 F. Supp. 886 (D. D.C. 1972).

National Commission for Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: United Stated Department of Education.

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act 1981, Pub. Law 97–35 (Aug. 13, 1981).

Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F. Supp. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1971).

Rimm S.B. (1987, November/December). Why do bright children underachieve? The pressure they feel. Gifted Child Today, 30–36.

Title IV, Part B. [Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act of 1988], Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1988, 20 U.S.C. § 3061 et seq.

Tuttle F.B. Jr. Becker L.A. Sousa J.A. (1988). Characteristics and identification of gifted and talented students. (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Ed. Association.

Whitmore J.R. (1980) Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Zirkel P.A. Stevens P.L. (1987). The law concerning public education of gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10 (4), 305–322.