BossertS.T.DwyerE.RowanB.LeeG.V. (1982). Tasks and social relationships in classrooms: A study of classroom organization and its consequences.New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1988). An imperiled generation. Saving urban schools.Washington, DC: Author.
3.
CohenM. (1990). Key issues confronting state policymakers. In ElmoreR.F. (Eds.), Restructuring schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
College Board. (1985). Equity and excellence: The educational status of black Americans.New York: Author.
5.
ComerJ.HaynesN.M. (1991). Meeting the needs of black children in public schools: A school reform challenge (pp. 66–71). In WillieC.V.GaribaldiA.M.ReedW.L. (Eds.), The education of African-Americans.New York: Aubum House..
6.
Congress of the United States. (1992). Testing in American schools: Asking the right questions.Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment..
7.
Darling-HammondL. (1991). Measuring schools is not the same as improving them. In The William T. Grant Foundation Commission on Work, Family, and Citizenship. Voices from the field: 30 expert opinions on America 2000, the Bush administration strategy to “reinvent” America's schools (pp. 15–16). Washington, DC: The William T. Grant Foundation Commission on Work, Family, and Citizenship2.
8.
Delgado-GaitanC.TruebaH. (1991). Crossing cultural borders: Education and immigrant families in America.Philadelphia: Falmer..
9.
FordD.Y. (1991). Self-perceptions of social, psychological, and cultural determinants of achievement among gifted black students: A paradox of underachievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio.
10.
FordD.Y. (1992). Determinants of underachievement as perceived by gifted, above-average, and average black students. Roeper Review, 14 (3), 130–136.
11.
FordD.Y.HarrisJ.J.III (1990a). Identifying diamonds in the rough: Gifted and talented black children. The Gifted Child Today, 13 (3), 17–21.
12.
FordD.Y.HarrisJ.J.III (1990b). On discovering the hidden treasure of gifted and talented African-American children. Roeper Review, 13 (1), 27–32.
13.
FordD.Y.HarrisJ.J.IIIWinborneD.G. (1990). The coloring of IQ testing: A new name for an old phenomenon. The Urban League Review, 1–2, 99–111.
14.
FordD.Y.WinborneD.G.HarrisJ.J.III (1989). Determinants of underachievement among gifted black students: Learning to underachieve. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35 (3), 145–162.
15.
FordhamS. (1988). Racelessness as a factor in black students' school success: Pragmatic strategy or pyrrhic victory?Harvard Educational Review, 58 (1), 54–84.
16.
GallagherJ. (Ed) (1990). The emotional adjustment of gifted students [Special issue]. Journal for the Education of the Gifted13(3).
17.
GansH.J. (1973). More equality.New York: Pantheon Books.
18.
GlassG.V.SmithM.L. (1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1 (1), 2–16.
19.
HarrisJ.J.IIIFordD.Y. (1991). Identifying and nurturing the promise of gifted black students. Journal of Negro Education, 60 (1), 3–18.
20.
HilliardA.G. (1976). Alternative to IQ testing: An approach to the identification of the gifted “minority” children. (Report No. 75 175). San Francisco State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 147 009).
21.
HilliardA.G. (1979). Standardization and cultural bias as impediments to the scientific study in validation of ‘intelligence.’Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12 (2), 47–58.
22.
JohnsonS.B. (1991). America 2000 and the national testing program: Implications for African-American children and youth. Journal of Negro Education, 60 (4), 497–499.
23.
Jones-WilsonF.C. (1986). Equity in education: A low priority in the school reform movement. Urban League Review, 18 (1), 31–39.
24.
Jones-WilsonF.C. (1991). School improvement among Black: Implications for excellence and equity (pp. 72–78). In WillieC.V.GaribaldiA.M.ReedW.L. (Eds.), The education of African-Americans.New York: Auburn House..
25.
McAdooH.P.McAdooJ.L. (1985). Black children: Social, educational, and parental environments.Beverly Hills: Sage.
26.
OakesJ. (1991). The many-sided dilemmas of testing. In the William T. Grant Foundation Commission on Work, Family, and Citizenship. Voices from the field: 30 expert opinions on American 2000, the Bush administration strategy to “reinvent” America's schools (pp. 17–18). Washington, DC: The William T. Grant Foundation Commission on Work, Family, and Citizenship.
27.
OlszewskiP.KuliekeM.BuescherT. (1987). The influence of the family environment on the development of talent: A literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11 (1), 6–28.
28.
PresseisenB.Z. (1985). Unlearned lessons: Current and past reforms for school improvement.Philadelphia: Falmer..
29.
RenzulliJ.S. (1988). The search for excellence — A modest proposal for schoolwide change. Roeper Review, 10 (4), 200–204.
30.
RichertS.E. (1987). Rampant problems and promising practices in the identification of disadvantaged gifted children. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 31 (4), 149–154.
31.
Rose vs. Council for Better Education, Inc., KY, No. 88-SC-804-TG (September 28, 1989).
32.
SternbergR.J. (1990). What constitutes a “good” definition of giftedness?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14 (1), 96–100.
33.
TochT. (1984). The dark side of the excellence movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 173–176.
34.
TreffingerD.J. (Ed.) (1984). Excellence and equity in education: Implications for gifted education [Special issue]. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(1).
35.
U.S. Department of Education (1991). America 2000: An education strategy.Washington, DC: Author.
36.
WhitmoreJ.R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
WhitmoreJ.R. (1988). Educational reform and gifted education: From the perspective of a dean. Roeper Review, 10 (4), 197–200.