AdlerM.J.HulchinsR.M. (1952). The great ideas: A syntopican of great books of the western world. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica..
2.
BettsG.KnappJ. (1980). Autonomous learning and the gifted: A secondary model In ArnoldA. (Ed.), Secondary programs for the gifted. Ventura, CA: Ventura Superintendent of Schools Office, 29–36.
3.
BeyerB.K. (1987). Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
BloomB. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
5.
Council for Exceptional Children (1989). Standards for programs involving the gifted and talented. Reston, VA: Author, 14–15.
6.
FeldhusenJ.F.KolloffM.B. (1979, September/October). A three-stage model for gifted education. G/C/T, (4), 3–5, 53–58.
7.
FeldhusenJ.F.ReillyP. (1983). The Purdue secondary model for gifted education: A multi-service programJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 4, 230–244.
8.
GaltonF. (1869). Hereditary Genius. London Julian Friedman.
9.
KaplanS.N. (1979). Inservice training manual: Activities for developing curriculum for the gifted/talented. Ventura, CA: Ventura Superintendent of Schools Office..
10.
KaplanS.N. (1986a). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted In RenzulliJ.S. (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, 180–193.
11.
KaplanS.N. (1986b). Qualitatively differentiated curricula In MakerC.J. (Ed.) Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted. Austin: Pro-Ed.
12.
MakerC.J. (1982a). Curriculum development for the gifted. Austin: Pro-Ed.
13.
MakerC.J. (1982b). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Austin: Pro-Ed.
14.
MakerC.J. (Ed.) (1986). Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted. Austin: Pro-Ed.
15.
MarzanoR.J.BrandtR.S.HughesC.S.JonesB.F.PresseisonB.Z.RankinS.C.SuhorC. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 115–129.
16.
RenzulliJ.S. (1977). The enrichment triad model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press..
17.
RenzulliJ.S. (1988). The Multiple Menu Model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talentedGifted Child Quarterly, 32 (3), 298–309.
18.
SatoI.S. (1988). The C3 Model: Resolving critical curricular issues through comprehensive curriculum coordinationJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 11 (2), 92–115.
19.
ShoreB.M.CornellD.G.RobinsonA.WardV.S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press, 78–84, 279–283.
20.
TabaH. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace.